In essence, he suggests limiting
special jurisdiction under Article 7 (2) to two fora at the choice of the injured party; the courts in both fora would have jurisdiction to rule on the full claim, irrespective of whether the claimant is a legal or natural person (paras 70 - 72).
Today I assert
special jurisdiction under the Pick of the Litter theory to share with you the awesomeness that is the «Humblebrag.»
Not exact matches
The charges in part read: «That you Col. Mohammed Sambo Dasuki whilst being National Security Adviser and Shaibu Salisu, whilst being the Director of Finance and Administration in the Office of the National Security Adviser and Hon. Waripamowei Dudafa (now at large) whilst bring Senior
Special Assistant, Domestic Affairs to the President on or about 27th November within the
jurisdiction of this Honourable Court entrusted with dominion over certain properties to wit: the sum of N10billion being part of the funds in the account of the National Security Adviser with the CBN, the equivalent of which sum you received from the CBN in foreign currencies to wit: $ 47million and $ 5.6 million Euros committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the said property when you claimed to have distributed same to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Primary Election delegates and you thereby committed an offence punishable
under Section 315 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532, Vol.4, LFN 2004.
(c) For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, and each fiscal year thereafter, the governing authority for each state charter school shall annually make available on the Internet web site of such governing authority the aggregate spending on salaries, employee benefits, instructional supplies, educational media supplies, instructional equipment, regular education tuition,
special education tuition, purchased services and all other expenditure items, excluding debt service, for each state charter school
under the
jurisdiction of such governing authority.
Under special circumstances, NHTSA employees may delete an NDR record but only upon request of the reporting
jurisdiction.
With this ruling the Court implicitly confirms its jurisprudence on the
special rule of
jurisdiction under Article 7 (2) of Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels I Regulation (recast)-RRB- for online infringements of personality rights.
Abandoning the «mosaic» approach to limit the number of potential
jurisdictions would more likely reflect the rationale of the
special rule of
jurisdiction under Article 7 (2).
(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both»; (b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the
special maritime and territorial
jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined
under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.
I hereby assert
special jurisdiction over the subject matter below
under rule 3 of the Rules of LBW Procedure.
Miller goes on to add some other activities which, in his view, constitute criminal contempt: obstructing persons officially connected with the court or its process, interference with persons
under the
special protective
jurisdiction of the court, breach of duty by persons officially connected with the court or its process, forging, altering or abusing the process of the court, divulging the confidences of the jury room, preventing access by the public to courts of law, service of process in the precinct of the court, and disclosing the identity of witnesses.
Far better to ask the Court to resolve it
under the
special procedure in Article 273 TFEU, which would surely apply: «The Court of Justice shall have
jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States which relates to the subject matter of the Treaties if the dispute is submitted to it
under a
special agreement between the parties.»
2.1 Absent any applicable
special regime, what is the legal framework
under which a foreign judgment would be recognised and enforced in your
jurisdiction?
The Court of Justice shall have
jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States which relates to the subject matter of this Treaty if the dispute is submitted to it
under a
special agreement between the parties.
But the petitioners were invoking the «
special jurisdiction» which had been provided for
under Section 14 of the Supreme Court Act, to have the Supreme Court re-determine the cause: on the ground that one of the appellate judges had lacked rectitude, so that this was a matter fit for re-opening before the Supreme Court.
While, for instance, responsibilities for education and health are shared between the Commonwealth, States and Territories, responsibility for record - keeping and access resides separately with each
jurisdiction; that for juvenile justice and welfare lies with the States and Territories, and the Commonwealth has «
special» responsibility for Indigenous people
under s 51 (26) of the Constitution (the races power), as well as for Australia's international human rights obligations by way of its Executive power to ratify treaties and its power to «incorporate» them into domestic law
under s 51 (29) of the Constitution.
In order to be eligible for State - funded adoption assistance a child must be a
special needs child as defined above and
under the managing conservatorship of the state of Texas (in state custody /
under jurisdiction of the state).
In order to be eligible for State - funded adoption assistance, a child must be a
special needs child as defined above and
under the
jurisdiction of a Michigan court due to a finding of abuse and neglect.
(2) An order with respect to the maintenance of a party to a de facto relationship in accordance with this Division ceases to have effect upon the marriage of the party unless in
special circumstances a court having
jurisdiction under this Act otherwise orders.
«The filling of this position is intended to constitute a
special / equal opportunity measure
under section 8 (1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), and [select appropriate
jurisdiction / s from: s 27 of the Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT) / s 57 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1996 (NT) / s 105 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) / s 65 of the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (SA) / ss 25 and / or 26 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1998 (Tas) / s 12 of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) and s 8 (4) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) / s 51 of the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA)-RSB-.