To implement their regulatory functions, temples (and later the palaces) developed
specialized bodies of law, beginning with rulings and prices governing their own sphere of activities.
Not exact matches
I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a matter
of procedural reform —
specialized decision - making
bodies with extremely simplified procedural rules for specific civil
law issues (something that actually already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family
law trial), and so on.
It is not adequate to characterize a tribunal as «quasi-judicial» on the basis
of one
of its functions, while treating another aspect
of the legislative scheme creating this tribunal — such as the requirement that the tribunal follow interpretive guidelines that are laid down by a
specialized body with expertise in that area
of law — as though this second aspect
of the legislative scheme were external to the true purpose
of the tribunal.
Specialized Experience Required: Experience that provided knowledge
of a
body of basic
laws and regulations,
law enforcement operations, practices, and techniques and involved responsibility for maintaining order and protecting life and property.