Using these patterns, we estimated the resulting gross vegetation carbon emissions [2, 5] and
species losses over time [6].
Not exact matches
If the variation between teeth decreased
over time, the team reasoned, this
loss of diversity would indicate that the ecosystem was declining and may have paralleled a long - term
species loss.
Similarly, deforestation often does not result in the immediate
loss of
species, and communities may exhibit a process of «relaxation» to their new equilibrium
over time [3].
Clearly, the
loss of biodiversity (estimated at thousands of
times the natural backgroud rate), the number of well known
species that are threatened (10 - 40 % depending on taxonomic group), the
loss of 10,000 - 30,000 genetically distinct populations per day (see Hughes et al., 1997) massive declines of groundwater, soil productivity and fertility, etc. as well as the fact that human activities now impact biogeochemical cycles
over huge spatial scales is sufficient evidence that our
species is living off of natural capital, rather than income.
I hope that in 50 years
time as Australians swelter in debilitating heatwaves, battle fierce bushfires, fight
over dwindling water resources, lament the
loss of unique
species and tell stories recalling the wonders of the Great Barrier Reef, they will be reminded of the names of those who refused to act in the face of overwhelming evidence of what lay ahead.