Sentences with phrase «specific child decision»

Not exact matches

Now that you've had a chance to take a look at the different products listed above, you should be able to make a decision based on your specific needs as well as your children's.
Your specific needs and desires will impact this decision greatly, and with all of the additional expenses that children bring, you do not need to end up spending money on the wrong purchase.
Parents should not make decisions about avoiding specific foods on their own, but should instead seek out a specialist if their child appears to have a food allergy.
This is a decision you should make with your whole family involved, but remember that if everyone is still benefitting from the sleeping situation, there's no reason to stop co-sleeping just because your child reaches a specific age.
An order for joint custody may specify one home as the primary residence of the child and designate one parent to have sole power to make decisions regarding specific matters while both parents retain equal rights and responsibilities for other matters.
This written notice will include the specific basis for the determination, the date when the child will no longer be able to attend school in the district, and information about appealing the decision to the New York State Education Commissioner.
Parents should not make decisions about avoiding specific foods on their own, but should instead seek out a specialist if their child appears to have a food allergy.
Basically, this means that doctors can make a decision on whether or not to proceed with specific treatments and can provide definitive genetic counseling for their children and other relatives.
To make accurate decisions about the quality of teaching and the impact of school programs, Willett and Singer urge policymakers to examine not what different classes of children know at each grade level, but how the knowledge and skills of specific groups change over time.
Target the development of specific skills needed for adaptive coping, sound decision - making, and effective self - regulation in children and adults.
I think teaching a child a second language is important for brain development, irrespective of the specific language, so this was not an easy decision.
In the specific context of hiring decisions, it is common for people who are middle class, White, and formally educated to make decisions about who will teacher lower - income Brown and Black children without the feedback, solicited or otherwise, of parents and children in that same community.
Fuel Tank,4 - Wheel Disc Brakes w / 4 - Wheel ABS, Front Vented Discs, Brake Assist and Hill Hold Control, 4.25 Axle Ratio,72 - Amp / Hr 550CCA Maintenance - Free Battery, Automatic Full - Time All - Wheel Drive, Electric Power - Assist Speed - Sensing Steering, Engine: 3.5 L SOHC V6 24V i - VTEC, Front And Rear Anti-Roll Bars,Gas - Pressurized Shock Absorbers, GVWR: TBD,Multi - Link Rear Suspension w / Coil Springs, Permanent Locking Hubs,Quasi - Dual Stainless Steel Exhaust, Strut Front Suspension w / Coil Springs, Transmission: 6 - Speed Automatic - inc: Sequential SportShift paddle shifters and grade logic control, ABS And Driveline Traction Control, Airbag Occupancy Sensor, and Rear Collision,Back - Up Camera, Blind Spot Sensor, Curtain 1st And 2nd Row Airbags, Dual Stage Driver And Passenger Front Airbags, Dual Stage Driver And Passenger Seat - Mounted Side Airbags, Electronic Stability Control (ESC), Outboard Front Lap And Shoulder Safety Belts - inc: Rear Center 3 Point, Height Adjusters and Pretensioners, Rear Child Safety Locks, Side Impact Beams, Tire Specific Low Tire Pressure Warning,4 - Wheel Disc Brakes,6 - Speed A / T, A / C, A / T, ABS, Adjustable Steering Wheel, All Wheel Drive, Aluminum Wheels, AM / FM Stereo,Auto - Dimming Rearview Mirror, Automatic Headlights, Auxiliary Audio Input,Back - Up Camera, Blind Spot Monitor, Bluetooth Connection, Brake Assist, Bucket Seats, CD Player, Child Safety Locks, Climate Control,Cross - Traffic Alert, Cruise Control, Daytime Running Lights, Driver Adjustable Lumbar, Driver Air Bag, Driver Illuminated Vanity Mirror, Driver Vanity Mirror, Engine Immobilizer, Floor Mats, Front Head Air Bag, Front Side Air Bag, Gasoline Fuel, Generic Sun / Moonroof, HD Radio, Heated Front Seat (s), Heated Mirrors, Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors, Intermittent Wipers, Keyless Entry, Keyless Start, Leather Seats, Leather Steering Wheel, Mirror Memory, MP3 Player,Multi - Zone A / C, Navigation System,Pass - Through Rear Seat, Passenger Air Bag, Passenger Air Bag Sensor, Passenger Illuminated Visor Mirror, Passenger Vanity Mirror, Power Door Locks, Power Driver Seat, Power Liftgate, Power Mirror (s), Power Passenger Seat, Power Steering, Power Windows, Premium Sound System, Privacy Glass, Rear Bench Seat, Rear Defrost, Rear Head Air Bag, Rear Spoiler, Remote Trunk Release, Satellite Radio, Seat Memory, Security System, Stability Control, Steering Wheel Audio Controls, Sun / Moonroof, Telematics, Temporary Spare Tire, Tire Pressure Monitor, Tires - Front Performance, Tires - Rear Performance, Traction Control, Transmission w / Dual Shift Mode, Trip Computer, Universal Garage Door Opener, V6 Cylinder Engine, Variable Speed Intermittent Wipers With top features including the push button start, blind spot sensors, a navigation system, braking assist, dual climate control, hill start assist, stability control, traction control, premium speakers, and anti-lock brakes, this 2017 Acura RDX AWD TECH is a great decision.
Posted Wednesday, January 17th, 2018 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
(1) «Joint custody» means both parents have equal rights and responsibilities for major decisions concerning the child, including the child's education, medical and dental care, extracurricular activities, and religious training; however, a judge may designate one parent to have sole authority to make specific, identified decisions while both parents retain equal rights and responsibilities for all other decisions.
Posted Wednesday, June 20th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Tags: Child Support, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Child Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Tuesday, October 18th, 2016 by Gregory Forman Filed under Department of Social Services / Child Abuse and Neglect, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 9 Comments»
This issue came before Black LJ and it was made clear that the decision was fact specific and it was of particular importance that the children's guardian had requested the report.
Posted Friday, July 27th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Child Custody, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Appellate Decisions
Posted Tuesday, May 5th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Tuesday, April 21st, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Alimony / Spousal Support, Child Support, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
In Canada, courts generally recognize that the well - being of a child is fundamentally interrelated with the well - being of the custodial parent; indeed, a 1996 Supreme Court of Canada ruling in a case called Gordon v. Goertz established conclusively that judges must apply the «best interests of the child» test in making decisions about whether a parent should be allowed to relocate with a child, which in turn requires an individual, fact - specific assessment.
Tags: Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 3 Comments»
Posted Wednesday, May 30th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 6 Comments»
A medical authorization is specific to your child's healthcare needs, it does not authorize your child to travel or anything else outside of making medical decisions.
Posted Monday, June 15th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Wednesday, July 29th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Child Support, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Wednesday, July 29th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Child Support, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Tuesday, November 1st, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Thursday, May 5th, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Appellate Decisions 8 Comments»
Tags: Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 2 Comments»
Posted Wednesday, June 6th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific, Visitation No Comments»
Posted Wednesday, June 6th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific, Visitation
Posted Wednesday, November 14th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Child Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Tags: Child Custody, Sibling Visitation, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Child Custody, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions No Comments»
Posted Tuesday, November 1st, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Thursday, November 3rd, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions No Comments»
Posted Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Tags: Attorney's Fees, Child Support, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Thursday, March 15th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 1 Comment»
Posted Thursday, August 5th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Tags: Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Imputation of Income, Judge Leslie K. Riddle, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 3 Comments»
Posted Tuesday, May 5th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Wednesday, July 22nd, 2015 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Friday, October 2nd, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Department of Social Services / Child Abuse and Neglect, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Additional Resources American Bar Association Commission on Immigration American Immigration Lawyers Association Amnesty International Country Reports Asylum Pro Se Guide — English (Create by students at Stanford Law) Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, University of California, Hastings College of the Law (includes resources for gender law and asylum) Department of Justice Country Conditions Research Detention Watch Network EOIR Virtual Law Library (with BIA precedent decisions) Human Rights Watch, Country Specific Reports Human Rights Watch, Children's Rights Division Immigrant Legal Resource Center Immigration Equality (includes extensive resources for LGBT asylum claims) Immigration and Nationality Act Immigration Regulations (C.F.R. Title 8) National Immigrant Justice Center's Resources for Attorneys Representing Asylum Seekers (includes numerous free training webinars) UNHCR Guidance Report on LGBT Asylum Claims United Nations High Commission on Refugees USCIS Guidance on Adjudicating LGBT Asylum Claims University of Minnesota Human Rights Library / Refugee and Asylum Resources U.S. State Department Country Reports Women on the Run, UNHCR Report (resources for female asylum - seekers) Women's Human Rights Net Yale Law School's Refugee & Asylum Resources (includes several resources for gender - based asylum claims)
Posted Monday, July 13th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Posted Monday, August 3rd, 2015 by Gregory Forman Filed under Department of Social Services / Child Abuse and Neglect, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Tags: Child Support, Jurisprudence, South Carolina Court of Appeals, Unpublished Opinions Posted in Child Support, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z