Asking enough «questions that don't have predetermined answers» will lead you far away from the ridiculously
specific claims of religion and into a more compassionate, enlightened, realistic frame of mind.
Not exact matches
two hundred - and - fifity in one archdiocese!?!?! I am not catholic, and therefore make no
claims to
specific knowledge
of the
religion nor those in positions
of authority.
I'm betting a lot
of people internally do this anyway when
claiming a
specific religion, like the one they were raised to believe.
Since Christianity does not have a
specific culture
of its own, and culture differs between different communities who
claim to hold the same
religion, every crossing
of cultural boundaries does not consist in doing mission.
Most people I speak with who are not affiliated with a
specific religion care more about humanity as a whole and the future
of the species than those who I speak with that
claim the world is going to come to an end, and soon.
In our dialogue with other traditions, the key to sustaining conversation (rather than cutting it short by
claims that others will interpret as arrogant) is to keep before ourselves the possibility that in some way or other all
religions may be relative, culturally
specific ways
of looking toward an ineffable mystery.
The question isn't what is true / scientific / rational / etc, but when / if followers
of a
specific belief should be expected to resist extremists who
claim similar beliefs B) not all extremists are motivated by religious beliefs, and not all groups which
claim a religious agenda are truly motivated by
religion