The simplicity of a single carbon price compared to country -
specific emissions caps is an important but elusive point.
Not exact matches
Most recently, California approved a measure to cut greenhouse gas
emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels within 15 years, and Washington State placed a
cap on
emissions from
specific industries.
We will
cap emissions according to
specific goals, measuring progress by reference to past carbon
emissions.
And, with the latest McKinsey report, it becomes even more clear that, if we want to substantially reduce
emissions, we will either need a carbon tax, a
cap - and - trade approach, or a whole bunch of
specific individual regulations aimed at encouraging and prompting the many individual
emission reduction opportunities.
[1] The resulting proposal was a market - based
cap and trade approach which intended to legislate power plant
emissions caps without specifying the
specific methods used to reach those
caps.
Probably the biggest grievance environmental justice advocates had with AB 398, according to Bill Magavern, policy director of the Coalition for Clean Air, is a
specific provision that prohibits California's Air Resources Board and local air districts from directly regulating carbon
emissions by sources that are also subject to the state's
cap - and - trade program.
What it likely refers to are sector
specific energy efficiency standards, not hard carbon
emission caps.
The term «comprehensive» can be seen as an indirect reference to an
emissions cap, but there was no
specific reference to it, much less a veto threat.
The
specific actions that I opposed in my essay were: (1) a
cap - and - trade system for carbon
emissions, (2) a carbon tax, and (3) $ 5 trillion of U.S. government spending between now and 2100 on technology designed to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
In May 2016, the courts found that Massachusetts law unambiguously directs the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to set sector -
specific, declining
emissions caps which lead to an aggregate 25 percent reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions by 2020.
For instance, in the run - up to the recent High - Level Meeting co-hosted with the UN in Beijing on technology transfer, there were rumours of the Chinese government accepting
emission caps or targets in
specific sectors.
Under one such arrangement, the Kyoto Protocol, which runs through 2012, signatories agree to
cap specific emissions.
The
specific pattern of changes, revealed in objects ranging from ship logs to ice
caps to tree rings, closely matched the predicted effects of greenhouse gas
emissions.
â $ ¨ â $ ¨ A
cap on carbon is important because it sets a
specific goal for reducing carbon
emissions 80 % by 2050.