As far as I know, the «left» has
no specific immigration policy.
Not exact matches
Specific policies include opting out of the Canada Employment Insurance Program and replacing it with an Alberta Employment Insurance Program; withdrawing from the Canada Pension Plan and creating an Alberta Pension Plan; assuming provincial control over national parks in Alberta; and asserting provincial (as opposed to federal) control over
immigration.
There are other think tanks, for example, that could assess
specific policy commitments — from scrapping tuition fees or reducing the level of
immigration — that may take a different position to the IFS.
To do this, we need only to return to the
immigration policies of the later part of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century to see many examples of such discrimination, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 that banned a
specific ethnic group or the Asian Exclusion Act of 1924 that effectively banned East Asians and South Asians through national
immigration quotas.
Like many Western countries, South Africa has adopted an urban asylum
policy, which is based on the temporary protection of refugees.1 To that end, refugees and asylum - seekers are treated as «temporary residents,» a legal position that implicitly subjects them to restrictive
immigration principles, namely exclusivity and self - sufficiency.2 Such treatment is inimical to the purpose and principles of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the
Specific Aspects of Refugees in Africa.
Underserved Populations: Many children require
specific instructional supports to reach their full potential, such as children living in poverty, those with disabilities, or who are English Language Learners, and / or are living in the United States under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
immigration policy.
As is the case with the election as a whole, both party platforms offer
specific proposals related to
immigration policy but provide few details on what their party believes to be the best strategy for supporting the large and growing number of ELLs who are in U.S. schools.
Advocate General (AG) Bot, who gave the Opinion in this case, also submits that the principle of solidarity between Member States in the area of EU
immigration policy has a
specific content and a binding nature (para. 23 of the Opinion).