In Tatton, Justice Moldaver held that the «importance» of the mental element comprised the «complexity of the thought and reasoning processes that make up the mental element of a particular offence» (para 34) and that «
specific intent offences contain a heightened mental element» (para 39).
As a murder is
a specific intent offence and after the case of DPP v Beard (1920) it is unlikely that the defendant will be convicted of murder?
This means that sexual exploitation is
a specific intent offence.
Not exact matches
One aggravating factor that is
specific to Child Pornography
offences is whether the accused committed the
offence with
intent to make a profit.
Mr. Justice Moldaver relied upon the court's perception of the «science»... in reiterating a long held position that intoxication is not a defence to a general
intent offence without referencing any recent empirical studies... By proceeding on this basis, the Court missed the opportunity to provide some rational basis for the general /
specific distinction.
The broader question on which the Court tried to provide guidance was how to distinguish
offences for which intoxication can be invoked as an excuse, and those for which it can not, somewhat confusingly known, respectively, «
specific intent» and «general
intent»
offences.
The judgment, which sets aside Tatton's acquittal and orders a new trial, provides a two - step process that must be taken into account when determining whether property damage is a result of a
specific - or general -
intent offence.
Moldaver allows that self - induced intoxication may, although not necessarily, provide a defence against
specific -
intent offences.