There are many fact
specific judicial rulings on how much compensation should be reduced for failing to wear a seat belt.
Not exact matches
This would mean, for instance, that participants in an economic transaction are bound to halt their activity whenever any one of them or any affected individual objects to it, or a criminal court judge is bound to halt the trial's proceedings if the accused dissents from a
specific rule of the
judicial system.
The Anglo - American idea... means that the party who does not abide by certain
specific decrees emanating from a
judicial body is a contumacious person and may, as a
rule, be held in contempt of court, fined and jailed... Now, this very concept of contempt simply does not belong to the world of ideas of a Latin lawyer.
This may seem counter intuitive, but the supreme court has made
rulings that both houses can decide how to determine a quorum in U.S. vs Ballin so the chances of this ever changing is unlikely without a
specific amendment or a fairly major change in
judicial precedent.
Two years ago, I wrote a post titled, In Litigation and Legal Research, Judge Analytics is the New Black, in which I discussed three products — Lex Machina, Ravel Law and ALM
Judicial Perspectives — that were extracting data from court dockets and applying analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might
rule on a
specific type of motion or how long they might take to issue a decision.
Moreover, it is apparent from the case - law -LSB-...] that the legislation indicated «that property not belonging to private persons shall be administered and alienated according to the
specific rules applicable to them; that, in respect of property belonging to public entities, even those pursuing industrial and commercial activities, the principle of non-seizability of that property precludes recourse to private - law enforcement remedies; that only the creditor who has obtained an enforceable favourable
judicial decision having acquired the force of res judicata and ordering a public entity to pay, even provisionally, an amount of money, may have enforced the
specific rules [applicable].
Closure Report: Complainant inquired if a violation of the
Judicial Conduct Board
Rules occurred when a Judge failed to issue a
ruling in 3 months without other any
specific information.
«By continuing to demand that the commission provide him with copies of their
rulings in
specific cases, the governor is continuing to improperly interject himself into
judicial proceedings to control the outcome,» Kathryn Williams, Monaco's attorney, said in a statement.
The court decided to review Issues 2, 3, 5 and 6 on a «deferential standard of reasonableness,» but applied correctness to Issues 1 and 4: «While I acknowledge that in the administrative law context a tribunal may develop its own procedures as to admissibility without the recognized strictures found in the
judicial rules of evidence, whereas issues # 1 and # 4 principally involve
specific questions of law and concurrent issues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correctness.
You will not have to accept
rulings from
judicial officers, who do not know you or your
specific needs;
In the first - year curriculum, this generally means an IRAC - style analysis requiring the synthesis of
rules from various
judicial opinions and other sources, followed by an application of those
rules to a
specific set of facts.40
[2] The determination of which category and, accordingly, which
specific Rules apply to an individual
judicial officer, depends upon the facts of the particular
judicial service.
In 2008, U.S. District Judge Karen Caldwell also threw out the Kentucky
Judicial Conduct Commission's rule against judicial candidates identifying themselves by party and raising money, but she upheld a ban on judicial candidates taking stands on specific
Judicial Conduct Commission's
rule against
judicial candidates identifying themselves by party and raising money, but she upheld a ban on judicial candidates taking stands on specific
judicial candidates identifying themselves by party and raising money, but she upheld a ban on
judicial candidates taking stands on specific
judicial candidates taking stands on
specific issues.
Likewise the (non) possibility for individuals to challenge regulations before the CJEU, the right of action (and
rule of law) principle can not circumvene the Treaties: the issue is that the CJEU stated that
judicial review on CFPS is a matter «within» the sphere of EU Treaties, so that MS (and EU Institutions) can not take action which may impact on them by using «outside» procedures; the rationale is the same used in other cases: if the matter is covered by EU law, absence of a
specific rule in EU law does not enable MS (or the Institutions) to act: in the Advice on the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction, the mere indirect effect of the Convention of the 44/2001 Regulation was considered sufficient to make the matter fall «wholly» within EU competence, thus depriving the MS of the power to act.
There are also
specific rules for the protection of personal data in police and
judicial cooperation in criminal matters (Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA).
While the reliability of children's out - of - court statements are subject to
specific rules of evidence regarding admissibility, these protections are lost in
judicial interviews.