Earlier today the New Hampshire House approved on a 170 - 160 vote HB 133 which would require judges in criminal cases give
a specific jury instruction (discussed here).
Earlier this week the New Hampshire Senate Judiciary Committee voted 5 - 0 to reject HB 133 which would require judges in criminal cases give
a specific jury instruction (discussed here).
If the court were to allow the issue of punitive damages to go forward to the jury, the jury would receive
specific jury instructions regarding the elements necessary to award punitive damages.
Not exact matches
They ruled that the
jury instructions should have been more
specific about the «official acts» that led to the bribery conviction.
The court presents the
jury with
specific instructions and outlines the types of things that may be considered for general or
specific damages, and the
jury decides the exact amount based on the negligence of the parties.
I mentioned earlier this week about efforts to impeach New Hampshire judges who declined to issue
specific jury nullification
instructions to
juries.
In all criminal proceedings, the court shall permit the defendant to inform the
jury of its right to judge the facts and the application of the law in relation to the facts by providing a
specific nullification
instruction to the
jury.
The years - long legislative efforts to compel New Hampshire judges to issue
specific jury nullification
instructions continues now with the threat of impeachment added should the trial judges obey a recent state supreme court opinion on the subject.
However, these
instructions are organized around categories of sexual offences (sexual interference, incest, sexual assault, etc) and do not contain any
specific directions cautioning
juries about the operation of myths and stereotypes in trials of sexual offences.
The New Hampshire House yesterday approved on a 184 - 145 vote a bill to require judges give
specific jury nullification
instructions to jurors in criminal cases
The bill is just the latest in a 20 - year effort by the state's legislature to force judges to give
jury nullification
instructions and do to so with
specific verbiage.
A similar bill without specifying what words were to be used was enacted in 2012 only to have the state's supreme court rule that the law did not require a
specific jury nullification
instruction.
Furthermore, the Defendant was unable to offer any
specific evidence it would or would not have presented to the
jury if the negligence
instruction had been given.
Nearly 95 per cent of respondents from jurisdictions containing a
jury system thought that, in addition to routine
instructions, jurors should receive
specific instructions limiting their online communications and use of online social networking sites.