It's prudent for courts and congress to exercise caution before restructuring liability theories for the purpose of addressing
specific market abuses, despite their apparent present magnitude.
Not exact matches
The recommendations relating to competition have not been enacted (yet)- they included reinstating
specific anti-price discrimination provisions, inhibiting firms achieving
market power through takeovers or
abusing market power (because they didn't think ss 46 and / or 50 were effective in achieving this) and expressly defining «
market power» «so that it is less than
market dominance and does not require a firm to have unfettered power to set prices» (apparently they were unfamiliar with the 2007 amendments to s 46).
Impermissible Uses.You understand that you may not: • modify, adapt or hack the Service or modify another website so as to falsely claim or imply that it is associated with the Service, AuthorMarketingClub.com, AMC, Author
Marketing Club or any other AMC service; • reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, resell or exploit any portion (including, without limitation, the contents of the AMC email or similar notification, the look and feel of the AMC website, and the contents of the web pages of the Service, use the Service or access the Service without the express written permission of Author
Marketing Club; • verbally, physically, or otherwise
abuse (including threats of
abuse or retribution) any AMC member or AMC employee, agent or officer; • upload, post, host, or transmit unsolicited email, SMSs, or spam messages; • transmit worms or viruses or any code of a destructive nature; • as a Reader Member, utilize the information provided in a Query other than to provide a relevant response to a
Specific Query posted by a Author Member; • violate any applicable federal, state or local laws or regulations; or, • plagiarize, violate or otherwise infringe upon the trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, or any other rights of any person, firm or entity, expressly including but not limited to libel, slander or invasion of rights of privacy, publicity or «moral rights».
These include a general
abuse of dominance provision, and several
specific provisions, the most important of which deal with exclusive dealing, tied selling,
market restriction, and refusal to deal.
However, with respect to breaches of certain
specific limited securities law provisions (which do not include, inter alia,
market abuse and other major securities law offences) investigated by Consob, there are two available options.
Only with respect to breaches of certain
specific limited securities law provisions (which do not include, inter alia,
market abuse and other major securities law offences), Consob officers must evaluate whether those breaches caused damage to the investors» protection, to the
market for corporate control, to the financial
markets or to the exercise of its supervision activities, and, if this is not the case, they can not proceed with charges.
Expert local insight in jurisdictions worldwide, covering: applicable legislation, sector -
specific controls, scope of application and public entities,
market definition and thresholds, collective dominance and dominant purchasers, exploitative and exclusionary practices, links between dominance and
abuse, defences,
specific forms of
abuse, enforcement authorities, sanctions and remedies, private enforcement and damages.
More importantly, the industry will have to think hard about how to align these developments which are
specific to the insurance sector to other broader regulatory changes, such as the new general data protection regulation, the
market abuse regime and the changes to the anti-money laundering framework, as well as keeping abreast with parallel guidance, technical standards, and similar pronouncements being issued by the local and European regulators.