It is amorphous with
no specific melting point but the temperature when it changes to a liquid state (glass transition temperature) is 105 degree celsius.
Not exact matches
Each compound, Sutterlin says, naturally
melts or solidifies at a different
specific temperature and can be used as the base material for an application, depending on the phase change
point needed.
And since water's
specific heat is 0.998 Btu per pound degree Fahrenheit then, it would take 143 times the heat energy to
melt water at its freezing
point than to raise the same quantity of water 1 degree Fahrenheit once it became a liquid.
In this regard, I would observe that at least one important AGW effect, rising sea level, does not depend on a
specific regional outcome so much as on global mean T. (At least, I think this is so (because my understanding is that most of the rise comes from lower density of warmer water, not from
melting ice sheets — though again, not 100 % sure on this
point)-RRB-.
The glacier
melt would probably have been the
specific question because it was a huge alarmist talking
point at the time.