Although it was an independent contractor agreement, rather than an employment contract, it had a similar arbitration clause, and that provision similarly was lacking in
specific statutory claims that were covered by the clause.
Not exact matches
That is, the
claim here is that Federalist # 65 is open to a broader sort of impeachable offense than
specific statutory crimes or violations of the Constitution.
This is obviously a different standard and each case should be looked at under its
specific facts to determine whether it falls under a
statutory punitive damages
claim or a common - law punitive damages
claim.
For instance, within the context of a motor vehicle collision, any such contractual term establishing a subrogation
claim would be contradicted and overruled by the
specific provisions set out in the
Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule and the Insurance Act, which purport that the accident benefits provider and at - fault driver receive a deduction for LTD benefits paid, not the other way around.
Generally speaking, aside from very
specific types of cases involving contracts, or
specific types of
statutory relief, a Plaintiff typically includes counts for things like NIED (negligent infliction of emotional distress), pain and suffering, loss of consortium, loss of future earning capacity — these are a few of the types of counts whereby there is no
specific value a defendant could ever point to being «fully satisfied» — the reason being, a jury needs to determine the legitimate value of these
claims unless the Plaintiff accepts a settlement award whereby he / she / it feels as if it's fully satisfied.
She explained the Supreme Court's decision, where the Court unanimously concluded that implied certification is a basis for FCA liability provided that (1) the
claim does not merely request payment but also makes
specific representations about the goods or services provided and (2) the submitter's failure to disclose noncompliance with material
statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements makes those representations misleading half - truths.
As of December 1, 2014, service providers who submit OCF - 21 forms through Health
Claims for Auto Insurance (HCAI) must be licensed with the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) to invoice and receive direct payment from automobile insurers for
specific «listed expenses» in connection with
statutory accident benefits.
As of December 1, 2014, service providers who submit OCF - 21 forms through Health
Claims for Auto Insurance (HCAI)[New Window] must be licensed with the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) to invoice and receive direct payment from automobile insurers for
specific «listed expenses» in connection with
statutory accident benefits.