Sentences with phrase «specific warming levels»

Not exact matches

The analysis indicates that — once you control for all other place - specific factors like political institutions and levels of economic development — warmer than normal temperatures in the year prior to an election produce lower vote shares for parties already in power, driving quicker rates of political turnover.

Incorporate into MPA management plans specific adaptation strategies and actions to address climate - change threats (ocean acidification and warming and sea - level rise), including monitoring of their effectiveness.

[url = http://www.northoutletslocations.com/] north face denali sale [/ url] Denali is the best quality Fleece among the North Face, it can also be the worlds most classic and popular fleece.Numerous the jackets are rated in accordance to their capability of maintaining warm at a specific temperature levels.

While the specific triggers for BCC episodes may vary from one dog to another, warm or hot environmental temperature, intensity of exercise, excitement during exercise, an excitable disposition, or high stress levels may contribute.

Geoengineering proposals fall into at least three broad categories: 1) managing atmospheric greenhouse gases (e.g., ocean fertilization and atmospheric carbon capture and sequestration), 2) cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight (e.g., putting reflective particles into the atmosphere, putting mirrors in space to reflect the sun's energy, increasing surface reflectivity and altering the amount or characteristics of clouds), and 3) moderating specific impacts of global warming (e.g., efforts to limit sea level rise by increasing land storage of water, protecting ice sheets or artificially enhancing mountain glaciers).

In this regard, I would observe that at least one important AGW effect, rising sea level, does not depend on a specific regional outcome so much as on global mean T. (At least, I think this is so (because my understanding is that most of the rise comes from lower density of warmer water, not from melting ice sheets — though again, not 100 % sure on this point)-RRB-.

However, to support the assertion that global warming is responsible for a great deal of damage from such events, it is sufficient to show that such events have the «signature» of global warming — for example, that specific global warming - related factors such as abnormally high sea surface temperatures, elevated water vapor levels, and altered jet stream patterns contributed to making Hurricane Sandy what it was — even if those factors can not be precisely quantified.

Thank you for finally admitting that a Level 3 rating «does not need to have a specific claim relative to > 50 % of warming.»

Following the signing of the Paris Agreement in December 2015, a targeted focus has emerged within the scientific community to better understand how changes to the global climate system will evolve in response to specific thresholds of future global mean warming, such as 1.5 ◦ C or 2 ◦ C above «pre-industrial levels».

The so - called hotspot is not something a feature specific to greenhouse gas induced warming but of any global warming, whether its due to increased levels of greenhouse gases or increases in solar radiation.

The very specific «level tropospheric temperatures over the past 15 or 16 years» (the measurement) does not equate in any way to «Global warming stopped 15 years ago».

Can millimeters of sea level rise or increments of warming on the globe's thermometer be attributed to specific energy companies?

With upcoming release of IPCC Fifth Assessment Reports beginning late in September, there will be a sharp focus on specific issues like projected sea - level rise but also on broader issues like climate sensitivity and the decade - and - a-half-long slow - down in the rate of overall warming.

These partially offsetting effects lead to the expectation that direct human shifts in water storage on land will not have large effects on sea level in comparison to the effects of ocean warming and mountain - glacier and ice - sheet melting (Wada et al., 2012), although notable uncertainties remain in regards to future groundwater use and reservoir construction, and these effects vary considerably depending on the specific location (NRC, 2012e).

Also, I am missing a specific statement that acknowledges that the short - term warming projections of TAR (0.15 ° to 0.3 °C per decade) and AR4 (0.2 °C per decade) turned out to be wrong, i.e. there has been no warming since the end of 2000, despite unabated human GHG emissions and atmospheric concentrations reaching record levels.

Mails that would have related to the scientifically uninteresting topic of the levels of warming in the MWP and specific arcane uninteresting statistical questions about uninteresting papers: minutia.

Changes in ecosystem structure can occur when specific organisms respond to surface warming, acidification, changes in nutrient ratios resulting from changes in external sources of nutrients (atmosphere or rivers) and changes in upper trophic levels (fisheries).

Although some nations have acknowledged their ethical duties to base their INDC on ethically justifiable criteria, almost all INDC submissions have not explained how specific emissions reductions commitments link to a specific desired atmospheric ghg concentration levels and its associated carbon budget that will provide some level of confidence that a warming limit will be achieved nor why their ghg emissions reductions commitment is fair as a matter of distributive justice.

Because of the nature of the phenomena alleged, there is «no realistic possibility of tracing any particular alleged effect of global warming to any particular [action] by any specific person, entity, or group at any particular level...»» (emphasis added)

I can accept that GHG's will lead to a somewhat warmer planet, but not agree that we yet understand all the factors that determine what the actual rate of that warming will be at any specific CO2 level.

Given the detectable impacts of a warmer planet on society, the presentation will argue as to what level of global warming is dangerous for specific sectors.

In comparison, we do nt have an alternative and simple theory of climate change that can explain the pause, and be consistent with a pause, and «also» explain the 50 years of warming, and the specific characteristics of the warming, sea level rise, and numerous other data.

nj: In comparison, we do nt have an alternative and simple theory of climate change that can explain the pause, and be consistent with a pause, and «also» explain the 50 years of warming, and the specific characteristics of the warming, sea level rise, and numerous other data.

Max, given the fact that a greenhouse's specific purpose is to create an evironment significantly warmer than the ambient surroundings (with the added benefit of being able to raise the CO2 level to +1000 ppm), I think your comment is the silliest in this thread so far.