Sentences with phrase «speech does»

But Queen Elizabeth's immortal Annus Horribilis speech does ring in my ears.

Giving a speech doesn't often kill a person, President William Henry Harrison being a noted exception...

Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you can do whatever you want on someone else's property,» starting an online argument about Twitter's policies on account suspension.

Besides they also have to make sure that one persons right to speech doesn't bother another persons right to privacy.

A commitment to free speech doesn't reconcile easily with human rights codes that may compel respect and courtesy toward specific groups — including their right to be addressed as they choose.

Further, she appears to believe that freedom of speech does not condone the expression of opinions about topics by people not formally trained in those topics.

For example, the right to freedom of speech does not mean you have to use that free speech at all.

Oh, and by the way, the first amendment right to free speech does not give you a right to anonymous free speech.

A right is not an obligation: having the right to free speech does not mean that you have to speak freely for example.

The IOC can not use DMCA takedown notices to silence the speech it does not like.

The IRS denial, in short, hinges on the applicant's activities looking too much like a for - profit trade or business and also the following not qualifying as «charitable» --(1) preserving the fundamental human rights set forth in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (b / c it is a declaration, not a treaty or law) and (2) safeguarding free speech in foreign countries (as the US Constitution's guarantee of free speech does not apply to residents or citizens of foreign countries).

TrueSceptic@23, if you follow the hyperlink I put in, you'll see that a panel of state Supreme Court judges in the US thought that yes, free speech does include the right to tell lies.

Exhibit # 1 comes from a Greenpeace website that, for years, has dismissed any notion that climate skeptics might have a point: «Freedom of speech does not apply to misinformation and propaganda» it proclaims.

As I say, free speech doesn't require «defending».

He says that because (he thinks) she's lying free speech doesn't apply to her.

«Free speech does not extend to misleading the public by making factually inaccurate statements», complained Bob Ward, the charmless leader of this new inquisition.

Nowhere in his speech does Bush support mandatory limits on emissions.

Freedom of speech does not involve the IPCC chairman making inaccurate, incorrect statements which can affect government decisions without being held accountable!

Text - to - speech doesn't work with PDF files.

Learning how to write an informative speech does not need to be an overwhelming challenge.

And at no point in the solo speech does it get personal — Hamlet never uses the words «I» or «me» or «my.»

A father's language skills may have a greater impact on a child's language development than the mother's speech does, a study suggests.

The text - to - speech does all the rest.

The other factor is that Smaug talks, I know Tolkien envisioned this but watching this dragons jaws move to speech doesn't really work.

Sew Good Reviews - We have some great sewing tips and the best sewing machine reviews Remember: an excellent speech does not require a brilliant orator - you can do it.

Whether I speak fluently or stutter on every word, my speech doesn't indicate anything about my IQ.

With us the mask continually slips, betraying feelings that our more easily controllable speech does not.

Evidence of Neandertal ability to produce speech does not help trace the beginnings of language, he and collaborators wrote in PLOS Biology.

Since political speech deserves the highest First Amendment protection, money spent on political speech does, too.

December 2012: Christmas comes, but the speech doesn't.

An impromptu speech doesn't seem to cut it.

Note that four of nine justices said that free speech does not apply to corporations.

Clegg's speech does nothing to address this.

The advance briefing on Corbyn's speech does not bode well for those who want concrete ideas expressed in clear language.

Incitement to violence is therefore a useful phrase, because it encapsulates how free speech does not extend to encouraging others to take away the freedom of others — in this case to live life without fear of attack.

«I believe in free speech but free speech doesn't mean you have the right to incite murder, to incite child abuse.

Dugdale's speech does not break very new ground.

The Warwick speech doesn't just announce a policy which has the potential to blow the election open.

Just because your child may have a delay in speech does not mean he will be diagnosed with autism.

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from disagreement or criticism.

But free speech does not mean protection from backlash and people standing up for what's right.

Calling your midwife at the end of a pregnancy because you are just realizing an expectation that she has expressed throughout to your wife is fairly inappropriate and demonstrates you haven't safely committed or planned for a safe home birth (waiting to pay her until the very last minute or until she has to give the «or else» speech does the same).

Freedom of speech does not apply at the emirates with the stewards confiscating posters and banners, just made me more determined for my next visit!

Freedom of expression, religion, speech does not give people the right to insult other religions!

Hitlers Munich speech does not reflect badly on Christianity because he did not practice what Jesus and his disciples practiced.

Free speech doesn't mean people can break the law and obstruct public areas.

Free speech does have certain limits.

Free speech does not equal hate speech in my book.

So, all of these people believe that people shouldn't be allowed to say insulting things, because free speech doesn't protect it?

But in his eyes human speech does not exclude the possibility of extending its philosophical use beyond its initially limited range of employment and of becoming capable of describing actualities it was not originally cut out for «Every science must devise its own instruments.