Sentences with phrase «spend on the single player»

The following year and the max we spend on a single player is again, around # 10 million.

The Gunners did break the record for spending on a single player though, bringing in Alexandre Lacazette from Lyon, and if the Arsenal transfer rumours had it right then Wenger was ready to spend even more to sign his France international teammate Thomas Lemar from Monaco.

Not exact matches

We will NEVER spend that much on a single player and I don't think pogba is even worth that much.

Oh right, so you are basing how much a club has spent, on literally the cost of one single player?

It's the reason why the 76ers gutted their roster of veterans and spent two lottery picks on players (Joel Embiid and Dario Saric) who aren't expected to log a single minute this season.

Arsene Wenger needs a striker and whilst he supposedly has a big transfer warchest the idea of spending vast sums of cash on a single player is still alien to the Gunners boss.

Spend big money on very few single players, like Pogba in for Rosicky, Arteta and Flamini going out.

i do nt think we will reach the level whereby we spend > 50 on a single player but we are able to bring in top top quality players.

And we have seen the boss spend over # 30 million on a single player three times in recent years, so perhaps we should not assume that he will not do so again.

Are we rich enough to drop 220m like PSG did for a single player or spend over 200m on two players the same season like barca.

We need a new striker... Cazorla who actually plays alongside Giroud (not like some obsessed guys here who've never played football expect in play - station) emphasized these... OOOhhh, have you heard city, madrid, bayern, etc players asking for strikers???... i bet no... so for only that reason in particular (God i have so many) i think we should spend on a top quality forward... 11-16-14 — Van pussy scored that in a single season just that we had a crappy team in general that time... we would have won the league if we had the team we have now

Now I think there is still reasons to be cheerful, I agree Man C & Chelski have spent & bought some good players, we all understand that 5 of those teams might be in the CL proper which is a huge distraction for those 4 - 5 teams.Chelsea will not be able to field the same 13 - 14 players all season, as for Man C they were very frail at the back last season, add to that 2 flying wing backs and I'm not sure they will be any better this coming season.LFC will most probably have CL as well if they qualify and haven't exactly bought great players apart from Salah who could be a good aquasistion for them.Spuds have sold a good player & strengthened a rival & still not bought a single player yet, Man U have bought 2 good players & in Lukaku have a proven goal scorer in the PL but if they play the same dour way they did last season & with the added games the CL brings will they perform week in week out in the league??? As for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the race.

Why so much effort and so much money spent to enter the top 4 in every single year?Just to be embarrased everytime by anyone?I mean, is not worth it if you don't take advantage of that and go for the glory.Everything is on vain, just the pleasure of showing up?This team doesn't have a future, it is just a mediocre one, get use it.Glory times are past, class players are gone... what is left?Just a name chasing the shadows of the past.And all this sorrow atmosphere has only one man responsible - Arsene Wenger.He must go for the good of the club, he is just a stone dragging the team backward or keeping it still.Just go Arsena, don't embarras yourself and the beautiful times you lived here.

Watching the game last night was really frustrating when they took giroud off and we were crossing the ball in to no one walking did nt even look like he was bothered or even on the pitch u can't cross a ball to a player like walcott or even play him as a single striker he just ai nt good enough i really liked walcott but i honestly cant see him as a striker for arsenal, he's better on the wing, my opinion we should get dm and spend whatever money is left on a bloody striker and not a shit 1, someone when a opposing team looks on the team sheet and thinks ah he's gonna give us some shit today

Not spending a lot on a single player?

If he has to stay through the last year on his contract, let him at least spend some money and get quality players for next season, to be able to at least give it one last try, of course we fans have to push him to spend money, and we really need to prevent the disaster of last season when he failed to sign one single player (minus gk, Cech of course)

Will Wenger be willing to sanction spending upwards of 20/25 million on a single player?

Bearing in mind Conte never spent over # 15 million on a single player during his time in charge of Juventus, we've decided to unearth the gems the imminent Chelsea boss could pick off from Serie A this summer to fit into his new team.

As mentioned earlier, Conte never spent more than # 15m on a single player in Turin and while that may be largely due to the fact he did not have the wealth he will have at Chelsea, the coach may be keen to stick to his guns and look for solid deals.

It would appear as though Randy Lerner has spent all he's willing to spend on the Villains, with manager Martin O'Neill having not shelled out a single penny on a new player thus far.

The existing squad has drastically improved, Spalletti's tactics have made a discernible difference, and — even though Inter would spend no more than $ 24m on a single player this summer — there's no doubt that «big» signings have been made.

Deeply agree with you guys, where is Arsenal team we used to watch???? Where in the world is it???? Really really desapointed.I think this is the worse Arsenal team Ive ever seen.i know these guys are talented but may be AW worship them so much as stars so that they spend their time with Chicks and do nt have the force to fight on the pitch anymore.No encouragement from the coach, nor the assistant.Arsenal only thinks about making money, forcing the fans to support these young players, focusing on the idea of producing stars and sell them afterward but not buying stars to win games.I was really pssd off when I watch the Liverpool game agst hull city, Both teams were so alive and all strong during the game, fast play, pass accuracy, dynamism, combativity, never give up minded on evry single minute they fought for the ball.ManU had a draw today but You could see that they were fighting till the end.I do nt know WHAT DID WE DO TO WIN AGST MANU AND CHELSKI?????.

Its hard to believe that manu lost 6 - 1 to man city, take nothing away from man city but every club uses manu as a measuring stick to compare themselves too, I really wish it was arsenal that gave that drubbing, I remember not long ago I was watching arsenal lose to manu by that you know what scoreline and my father (a manu fan) walk away, when it was 3 something becoz he couldn't watch a far one sided match, so I guess he is feeling what we are feeling that day, manu is always a side that neva lose by a huge margin no matter what, but tell you da truth I don't like man city becoz I do nt like a side that will spend and replace every single player and still have classy players on the bench, they can say that we won that and this but that becoz of the huge wages that we are paid, I just don't like football to be won by having money to spend there should be a mixture of everything good, middle and work in progress players.

If you have extra money to spend on courtside seats or really enjoy watching a basketball game anyways, this is one method that will put you in close contact with the single basketball players and who knows?

The single player was real solid though and I like that if you're real good at multi you don't have to spend a dime on the game.

This was the longest amount of time I've ever spent on a single - player campaign, but I did it.

so why spend time making multiplayer elements for a game that really would only feel tacked on compared to just solely focusing on making a great single player experience.

Each item only has a single use, but stocking up on these resources can save players a great deal of time that would have otherwise been spent attempting the same sections over and over.

The single player focused Rockstar we knew and loved could be turning into a company more focused on producing a multiplayer experience that facilitates expansion — such expansion allowing for long - term content support and a consistent player base open to recurrent spending.

I too spent 300 + hours on single player mode and another 300 + online.

An ex-BioWare dev says that the linear single - player AAA game at EA is «dead» for now, and someone spent $ 15,000 on Mass Effect multiplayer cards.

I don't know if I'm prepared to say that I would ever spend full price on just a single player that was like this but I would definitely pick it up in the future by itself if they ever did something like this as just a single player only title had I would even go as far as to say if they had two more stories I would probably consider purchasing full price day one.

I've had the past weekend to explore the new Halo title on the Xbox One, spending most of that time in the single player campaign.»

Me and my friend had a great time playing through the story mode together as our first bomberman game, and I found it to be worth the $ 40 I spent on it for the single player, due to the differing difficulties.

And players don't always stick to a single game: Hughes said he's spent at least $ 1,000 on «NBA 2K.»

I still plan to rent the game for the single player, bu I'm not planning on spending a lot of time with the multiplayer.

On the other hand, I haven't played a Call of Duty since the original Black Ops back in 2010 and now just play retro indie craft beer shooters like Ion Maiden and Amid Evil instead, so it's not like they were going to win me over no matter how much they spent on hiring one big - name actor for the single - player campaign anywaOn the other hand, I haven't played a Call of Duty since the original Black Ops back in 2010 and now just play retro indie craft beer shooters like Ion Maiden and Amid Evil instead, so it's not like they were going to win me over no matter how much they spent on hiring one big - name actor for the single - player campaign anywaon hiring one big - name actor for the single - player campaign anyway.

New co-op levels and single - player challenges bring you back to a game you already spent way too much time on — for free!»

They explained: «Do we keep pressing ahead on Arena multiplayer which likely will only have a small following and will take many more months than expected, or do we spend that time making the single player better.

And in fact, after spending a few hours with Akuatica: Turtle Racing, completing its single player story, participating in a tacked on additional mode that best represents the name, and showing my friends the way to go in the local multiplayer option, I still have absolutely no idea what is going on, why the game is called what it is, or what on earth was going through the mind of the team behind it throughout the development of the game.

Single player on the other hand is where the real meat of the game lays, and it's here that you'll likely be spending the majority of your time.

However, instead of XP that you get from single - player the mutliplayer mode gives you the ability to earn gold which you then can spend on upgrades which is a nice little diversion from single - player.

We have spent hours going through the Kickstarter comments and researching all of the project materials, and I feel the backers have made one thing clear — we need to focus on the original single player game and Matsuno's design that was promoted during the campaign.

Im not going to spend 60 bucks on a single player game to get bored as soon I finished the story.

Rather than having one team work on both campaigns for the game, they decided that the developers formerly known as EA LA, Danger Close, would spend their time and resources on single - player while DICE, of Battlefield fame, would take to task on the multiplayer mode, which is their coup de grace.

This game is becoming more of a single player or Korean moba game were it's all about the money you spend on game stores.

Basically you should look at Siege as an online only game, it has a few hours for single player gamers but it's not worth spending money on that.

There are a few single - player modes present, but you'll likely spend most of your time in contained competitions, which can be played out as 1 - on - 1, team or every - man - for - himself contests.

To provide a sense of scale for what can be involved, for several of the student / hobby projects that I've seen support online multiplayer, they spent a full semester building the game in single player or AI opponents or local multiplayer, then needed an entire second semester — literally doubling the project's time — to focus on getting online multiplayer ready for release.

In my time spent playing Sword Art Online: Hollow Realization, I only played a few sessions of multiplayer and focused on the single player campaign.