Sentences with phrase «spend only points»

So that's another advantage — we don't have to spend only points.

Not exact matches

As the price of fuel has dropped, it's been taking up a smaller and smaller share of these expenses, to the point that now, he estimates, fuel only makes up about 15 percent of airlines» spending (assuming their other costs have remained roughly equal).

While the consumer spending report is only one small data point among a dozen factors, it could be a sign that we will see pay stabilization, and even show us a slight increase over the next few months.

The biggest one to date for a biosimilar product in the U.S. — the treatments have only been around for a handful of years in America despite widespread and long - standing availability in Europe and other regions — Renflexis may ultimately not do much to curb health care and patient spending, as the Wall Street Journal «s Charley Grant points out in an astute note.

When you get to the point where you're only spending a few hours a year managing your investments you can move on to the next thing.

However, Business Insider points out that this is only a total of $ 500 million more than the companies are spending on R&D right now.

If a company boss can't play with a government official, there's little point in him spending his money,» said the owner of a golf equipment store in Shanghai who only gave his surname as Huang.

Aeroplan has now reversed that decision, angering only those who didn't quite have enough points for their dream vacation and spent all their points on Alouettes tickets the day before the announcement, expecting their miles to begin expiring on Jan. 1, 2014.

Ads in apps aren't blocked: The brokerage firm points out that iOS ad - blocking apps only block advertising that comes via Apple's mobile Safari browser, but the vast majority of mobile users spend most of their time inside apps, which also generate the bulk of advertising revenue.

One of my colleagues makes it a point to only meet one person at any given event and spends his time really getting to know that one person.

Collins pointed out that a big part of UK (and indeed US) election law relates to «declaration of spent», before making the conjoined point that if someone is «hiding that spend» — i.e. by placing dark ads that only the recipient sees, and which can be taken offline immediately after the campaign — it smells like a major risk to the democratic process.

Existing AirBnB users will only earn 1 Elevate point per $ 1 spent.

Not only does this card offer a huge signup bonus, but you earn three points per dollar spent on travel and dining and one point per dollar on all other purchases.

For example, Ink Cash points can not be transferred to a travel partner, receive the 25 % redemption bonus, and the bonus spending limits are only $ 25,000 (they were $ 50,000 for the Ink Preferred).

It's a time - consuming process that sometimes takes months or years, depending on your sales cycle, so salespeople should make sure that they're only spending time with prospects whose pain points align with your product's solution.

For years, he has tried to create and adhere to a specific annual spending plan, only to blow a hole through it at some point during the year.

The Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card doesn't perform quite as well in the general rewards category, only offering 1 point for every dollar spent.

I've structured the figures to allow me to say at this point, «What I'm excited about is this: the machine that meets all your minimum requirements involves an investment of only $ 10,000 — substantially less than the amount you're prepared to spend.»

Argentina and Venezuela each print their own currencies, but they have reached the point where the only way they can meet their socialist spending requirements, is to start producing as much as they are consuming.

But if you're only spending $ 200 on a hotel room and using just 10,000 points, each point would only be worth two cents ($ 200/10, 000).

But the domestic spending only represents a genuine economic boost if it would not be spent otherwise, on something else, as the consultancy Capital Economics points out in a report to be published on Thursday.

Infrastructure, we're going to start spending on infrastructure big, said Donald Trump days before he unveiled his $ 1.5 trillion infrastructure budget proposed by his administration, but as economists have pointed out, Trump's proposed budget requests only $ 200 billion in federal funds and slashes billions in transportation funding, billions more from water, energy.

None of the Bloomingdale's cards have any tiers of spending - only point accumulation, which is great news for those who don't want to spend thousands of dollars before they see savings.

This 2 % statement credit rate is only true if FlexPerks cardholders limit their spending to the categories offering double the points rates.

Case in point: according to a 2016 study by the Finra Investor Education Foundation, only 2 in 5 Americans is able to spend LESS than they earn.

Not only is the stock market not even remotely discounting the underlying economic reality, but the S&P 500 spent the last four weeks clawing back 78 % of the 249 point (12 %) drop that occurred just after New Year's despite the continued plethora of increasingly negative economic reports.

All of this is only to point out that the church has lots of money, and we should make careful, wise decisions about how we spend it.

From our point of view, this would be so only in the sense that the original state of things would represent a world - condition of maximum possibility, pregnant with future development, with a minimum of spent possibility in the form of transpired history.

Members will not receive points on any coupon or promotional offer; points will only be issued for the amount of money actually spent during the visit.

Some facts for ibrahim We are 30 Points off top 10 Points off 4th Tottenham (who don't spend as much as we do either) And only 25 points off Points off top 10 Points off 4th Tottenham (who don't spend as much as we do either) And only 25 points off Points off 4th Tottenham (who don't spend as much as we do either) And only 25 points off points off bottom

But as you have correctly pointed out though is that we only really spent the budget on 2 additional players really (even thought i believe that they would have been covered by c / l monies and other finances from building projects we make money and monies owed from debts owed to us from barca and others for players sold in years gone buy on thus not really touching the puma and emirates money at all # 70 million +).

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

glad someone has time and patience to spell this out... i have lost patience with most on this site who have been in denial on these points for so long it has become dispiriting... the number of people who spent time telling barcelona that ramsey was not for sale was as big an indication as any to me that delusion had become systemic among too many fans only disagreement is with wilshire..

«I only wanted to point out that we have a very good team and if you want to strengthen, you have to spend a huge amount of money and you still don't have any guarantee of winning the Champions League.

now we are putting all our eggs in the miki basket by signing auba hoping to recreate the dortmund connnection, Auba a player better than laca but so similar it makes no sense spending that amount of money especially with all the cracks in the team, but hey lets do that and get rid of giroud our only option B upfront to accomodate miki a player who is 29 and at the lowest point of his career, building a team around him shows me that sad state we our in, we take what we are given and try to make the best of the situation and that's all of us from the board to the manager to the players all the way down to the fans.

Cmone!!!! I think we should check how much crystal palace has spent or even liverpool.we as fans are not unhappy we just wish what is the best for our club.we've seen this movie unfold so many times and i beleive its due to the fans presure that we are even getting anyone.i know its a exciting time (only jump when confirmed) but lets not forget we hve dropped 5 points which would hve been prevented had we done our deals early.now we hve a huge task ahead of us catching up is no easy feat its easier to just keep going down the table than it is easy to rise

And anyway saying that we have only really spent # 21million is pointless, arsenal have money to spend anyway, there's no point spending money on players we don't need just because we havent spent all this so called budget that everyone seems to think they know exactly what amount we have to spend.

We actually have a net spend of about 120 - 130m since hes been back whereas Chelsea only have a net spend of about 30m so he isn't wrong and has a very big point but the differnece is we're spending our own money, rather than just some rich sugar daddy.

I really do not understand why certain fans are calling for his head because if you look at a club like City, they have spent a hell of a lot more than us and have a far better squad on paper, yet are only 3 points ahead of us so far this season.

They spent 2000 points to go only 3 spots.

Fact is we have not won the PL in 12 years Fact is we were 12 points off Chelsea last year Fact is we were 4 points off City last year Fact is both teams spent serious money and strengthened their squad Fact is we only strengthened in one position a position where we were not too weak tbh Fact is in the PL there are 4 - 5 top teams unlike other top leagues Fact is we are already 5 points off City Fact is you snooze you loose

Arsenal capital could benefit hugely from teams who focus on net spend per trophy over the more sensible metric of net spend per point... This only strengthen out net spend per point KPI.

The thing that really bothers me is the thing we've disagreed on in the past and that's imo Wengers apparent lack of Urgency and decisiveness when moving into the transfer window I know that Scheweinsteiger would be a great addition but He is somewhat over the hill in comparison to the others that are being toted about and while I know that we are not the cash Rich Man Poo or Man Sh!tty or Chelski I do know that we are at a point for the first time in ten years where we don't need to replace many players or are being frced to sell the quality ones we have, we are for the first time in a spot where we only need to add two or three players and we are there in terms of being able to compete, Id hate for the financial Exuberance to stop us taking that final stride forward into the competitive team we nearly are IMO spend the money now, get the striker, get the DM and we wont need to look at transfers in a big way again for several seasons and with that in mind Id rather have the likes of Benzema or Lacazetta or even Cavanni than a nearly over the hill Scheweinsteiger.

While it took Jenson Button until 2006 to pick up his first F1 win and 2009 to score his first and only F1 world title, the British driver spent many years in midfield machinery and was a consistent points finisher before finding success in the sport.

It boils down to this, if we only buy in one key player per season we are NEVER going to be able to compete with the elite clubs and despite there being a few good points in your argument above its worth noting that only 11 million was spent last summer when it was as clear as the noses on anyones face that we needed a better spine up the middle of the pitch, AW has offered and given Theo a new contract at twice the wages he was on and he is without doubt the highest paid flop in the team.

That did not happen and the Foxes stunned their big spending rivals with a reasonably comfortable win, but I feel that this was the next best result from an Arsenal point of view, even though the eight point gap that we now see would have only been five had Manuel Pellegrini and his players prevailed.

While Liverpool have fallen further... My point is while we have fallen, we are getting the revenue to build up paying debts and to than be able to eventually spent # 35m on a player... Our aim from doing that (only been 2 seasons) is to get to the point we continually challenge.

What's the point of spending 50 million on a player, only for the manager to play him out of position?

The Orioles are the only team that has been in sustained, serious discussion with him as far as anyone knows, and their offers, to this point, haven't been enough to convince Davis or his agent, Scott Boras, that Baltimore is where he'll spend the bulk of the rest of his career.

Spending more money will only make their net spend per point go up hahahaha suckersssss.