Sentences with phrase «spend serious money»

Get ready to spend some serious money on attorney's fees and litigation costs.

(Not everyone wants to spend serious money on a painting for their living room that says «Inner - City Make Scream,» for instance.)

If you're a serious writer, be prepared to spend serious money on editing — perhaps the most expensive part of your entire publishing adventure.

Yes, I have some quite serious long term plans, much of which involves having to spend some serious money on new equipment, and expanding in some exciting new directions.

Louis Van Gaal is proving that he's not afraid to spend some serious money, with reports now emerging that the # 50 million rated Arjen Robben is top of his shopping list in January.

But the last two years have seen him spend serious money that we fans and the media believed he couldn't.

There is Rosicky, of course, and Santi Cazorla but they are both injured as well, so if Wenger wants to avoid the same thing happening to the German as happened to our other superstar Alexis Sanchez because there was no one to cover for him, he had better be ready to spend some serious money in the January transfer window.

I love this team too and you are right we do need to spend some serious money to compete and that seems unlikely given Gadzidis recent comments.

It's time to spend some serious money on ending hom.os.exuality.

Spending serious money on some talented players will show him that there is hope in Arsenal yet.

It is definitely not fiction and certainly not a coincidence that Arsenal stopped winning trophies the same year we moved into the Emirates and won a trophy the first year in 9 years we started spending serious money (money that was not given but earned).

Chelsea transferred their middle table club into prem winners within couple years of spending serious money and the same has to be said about Man City.

They came here to win & the deal should be win the Premier League this season, use both sign on & we will add 3 big top quality players this summer to go for it by spending serious money.

Fact is we have not won the PL in 12 years Fact is we were 12 points off Chelsea last year Fact is we were 4 points off City last year Fact is both teams spent serious money and strengthened their squad Fact is we only strengthened in one position a position where we were not too weak tbh Fact is in the PL there are 4 - 5 top teams unlike other top leagues Fact is we are already 5 points off City Fact is you snooze you loose

So there was a lot of talk about the club and manager making changes and also spending some serious money during the summer transfer window.

Former Liverpool FC managing director Christian Purslow believes the Reds must start spending serious money and on a regular basis if they are to stop falling further behind the Premier...

Marvel reportedly spent some serious money on polishing the effects prior to release, and on screen the money shows.

It's not until you get into the thousands of learners that you really need to worry about spending serious money.

Not exact matches

But if you're willing to spend money to receive counseling from highly influential people, they know that you're serious about your business.

Couple that with their new video ad products for sales and direct response and the fact that they're the greatest data company of all time for marketers and you have some serious reasons to spend some real money on Facebook video ads and video content for Facebook.

if you are serious about trading, then you should spend the most money on education and only trade very very small..

For one thing, that most theologians and most publishers had severely underestimated the number of people who were willing to spend good money on serious books about religion.

and thats it really we sold Van Persie and never really spent the money we earned on a new striker and the likes of sanchez are rare so who knows but I would bet we would sell him if City or bayern were offering serious money.

But nowadays even what used to be considered «Small clubs»» have some serious spending money, and shopping in the bargain basement for top - four won't work anymore.

If Arsenal are serious about winning the League and more then Mr Wenger's way of doing business has to stop he needs to spend MONEY.

Any serious pundit should have foreseen this but most of them were preoccupied with spending more and more money to buy the trophy.

As has been regurgitated on a thread to thread basis Arsenal are realistically two quality signings (Lacazette / Benzema, Bender \ Krychowiak) from being a serious European football power, why would Wenger in the twilight of his career not spend the money thats readily available?

The board don't give a sh!t bout winning anything they only care about keeping the share price high and their bank balances in the six figure region Wenger has only kept his job because he does what the board expects and that's keeping us competitive WITHOUT actually winning anything too serious and WITHOUT spending too much money Now here's the teal nasty bit imagine if we won the EPL the next thing the fans would expect is the CL and to win that we'd need to spend big far bigger than we ever have oh no far better to just make 4th each season and see the money roll right in to the boards pockets and f@ck what the fans think

The only way that the news of the latest strong financial position that Arsenal Football Club find themselves in, for us fans at least, is if the Arsenal board decide to get really serious about spending money in the summer transfer window.

With the new premier league TV deal mid table clubs who you'd expect to be safe in the premier league could now have some serious money to spend improving there teams and making them even harder to beat.

Perez never want to get beaten in any transfer deal and has Di Maria money to spend, if they are serious we don't stand a chance.

Wenger manage to please them by spending few money and still making the club have profit.Imagine all those clubs outside the top 4 crying for the CL place as there is so much money involved, that why Wenger is untouchable by the board.He is over achieving compare to what he spend and he does not spend in order to win but to compete.Don t come with your crap talk about Ozil and Sanchez, their buy did not solve nothing of the serious needs of the team, it was Hollywood signing just to woaw around people and supporters.

that's where our big money is spent, and i have serious doubts that the current starting lineup is our best configuration, no matter the stats.

Money was going to be spent they claimed, serious money, but we are still waiting for a se4cond summer signing who actually cost the club anything but wages, while all the Premier League clubs around us have spent way more once aMoney was going to be spent they claimed, serious money, but we are still waiting for a se4cond summer signing who actually cost the club anything but wages, while all the Premier League clubs around us have spent way more once amoney, but we are still waiting for a se4cond summer signing who actually cost the club anything but wages, while all the Premier League clubs around us have spent way more once again.

Bullshit we have as much money as Southampton lol, on a serious not we were told if wenger wants to spend they will make funds available so who's fault is it????.

We don't spend big, we don't compete, we have a manager that's not serious, and cares only at making money for the board.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Abramovich is bored of watching other clubs spend money and wants to do some serious financial damage!

never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise

I don't think the board is letting him (AW) spend big money because of the new incoming manager who will demand at least 200 million if he is any good and serious about winning EPL and CL and I think it will hapen in the summer

FGS if we only spend the money we have in the bank (360M) its enough to be a serious chalangers for the CL and win it, I think they the management don't mind the negative press as they say «any news is good news» in the advertising business, ask your selfs which other club gets more media than Arsenal and who has the most live matches on TV,

There is a serious temptation for owners to spend big money in order to retain their seat at the top table.

Our recruitment of the lower leagues hasn't been good enough and we've missed some serious talent because we think money is better spent abroad, Millwall and Sheffield United have shown this season that league One players are more than capable if they are the right ones.

But if political advertisers in general really ARE wasting more than half the money they spend on video ads, that's a very serious problem.

If he's serious about spending his own money, and puts in a lot of money early, he can push most of the field aside.

The concern is that without serious changes to how local governments and school districts are forced to spend their money, which the cap is meant to address, the measure will be overridden.

The Public Accounts committee gave its verdict today on the 2007 spending review today, arguing that if lessons in getting value for money are not learned from that process then frontline services are at «serious risk» under the new government's austerity drive.

If we are serious about science as a public good, we should give the public control over the ways in which some — and I stress «some» — of its money is spent.

SoAR is also working to insert «a serious science title in the next farm bill» that calls for doubling, to more than $ 700 million, the amount of money that USDA spends on competitively awarded research, Grumbly says.

But that is serious money and I don't think we are going to spend it on that.