Sentences with phrase «spend the money on games»

In contrast, 60 % of middle - aged gamers state that they never spend any money on game content.

Even the mere thought of spending money on this game, makes my pockets genuinely sad.

Hello I be doing a review on a game called Dead Rising 4 it was relisted 06/12/16 on Xbox one it top selling game people are worth to spend money on the game because it best - selling game also Dead Rising 4 is an open world survival horror beat»em up video game developed by Capcom Vancouver and published by Microsoft Studios for Microsoft Windows and Xbox One.

DO NOT spend money on this game because EA will not help you and it completely broke my game.

Avoid at all cost if you're a fan of the X franchise.Or if you even thought for a second to spend money on this game.

That's the great part about it, you don't have to spend money on every game, but they still make a ton of money off the 10 % of players who do buy IAP.

Spend your money on a game that isn't going to be released until 2015.....

You could spend all your money on games and them... Must be a young man's dream... to have awesome games, awesome babes, and the time and money to spend on both.

And this why I think indie games have a saying on PlayStation since they get good money worth for there games get put on ps + also players do nt have to worry about spending money on the game because they get it for having ps + not just indie games they get chance to play tripple A games aswell like metal gear solid 5 ground zeros was phenomenally good but seriously I wouldn't want to pay 20 dollars for it thanks to ps + I got to play it

As a gamer, I can't imagine why anyone would want to drive out the people who actually spend money on the games we enjoy.

I mean how on earth could they spend money on those games right?

It has stopped them securing 3rd party exclusives and timed exclusives like MS. I for one am not complaining as it means they have focused on producing their own games rather then spending money on game that will be on a rival system and PC in 6 months time.

Personally I don't care for shovelware and would rather spend my money on games that don't suck.

I wouldn't spend money on this game, especially since I didn't even play the first one.

Who would want to spend money on a game where the only thing to do is burn things in a virtual fireplace?

But as the industry exists, we're going to have to continue putting up with developers tripping over themselves to justify «tacked - on» multiplayer modes, add - on purchases, and other incentives to spend money on games past the original retail price.

I find myself more willing to pay developers what they deserve but just can't bring myself to spend money on games I honestly won't end up playing, whatever the cost of that game is.

Such gameplay is not for everyone so be sure to know what you buy before spending money on this game!

Anyone who spent money on the game before it transitions to free will release a credit on their account between thirty to sixty days from October 5th.

Luke Smith makes me not want to ever spend money on this game and Bungie should consider teaching him how to interact like a normal human being before letting him interview again.

Another December, another Steam sale to entice you to spend money on games you don't have time to play just to have them for a rainy day!

This isn't a free to play game, you are spending money on a game that you expect to be worth the price tag and I believe this title doesn't offer bang for your buck.

But why would I spend money on a game if I don't own the console to play it on?

Imagine if video game reviews weren't something you had to read through in order to work out if you wanted to spend your money on a game?

You don't have to spend any money on a game if you don't want to but if you feel like spending $ 20 on a free game you've spent 100 hours playing then why not?

Quite simply, this is taking advantage of people with poor impulse control and can't help but spend money on the game.

If I had a console, or a computer that ran Windows, and I spent money on games outside bundles (actually the Dark Souls price looks more reasonable than I expected), and if I actually had the time to spend on this stuff, I would be all over Dark Souls.

We would much rather spend money on the games (as well as hulu +, netflix, amazon prime, and movie rentals).

I understand that used games consumers spend money on the game, but developers and publishers really have zero reason to go out of their way to encourage people to continue to buy games used when it won't benefit them in the short or long run.

Gamer dads will find themselves spending money on a game they might normally pass up just to experience their childhood activities with their family.

Spending money on this game that we don't really want only proves to Eidos that we'll spend money on games that we don't really want.

Unsurprisingly, most iPhone users are spending their money on games.

While that may seem tempting, there's really no need to spend any money on that game upgrade.

Thankfully we don't have to spend money on game over screens, right?

Not exact matches

The firm also plans to ban users under 12 years from logging in after 9PM in China and will impose further restrictions on how much money younger users spend on the game, it added.

In his paper «Mega-Events: The effect of the world's biggest sporting events on local, regional, and national economies,» he writes: «A local resident who goes to an All - Star Game when it is in town is spending money at the game that likely would have been spent locally elsewhere in the absence of the gGame when it is in town is spending money at the game that likely would have been spent locally elsewhere in the absence of the ggame that likely would have been spent locally elsewhere in the absence of the gamegame.

«This is money that businesses are [already] spending out at a noisy hockey game, when they could be discussing the details of a deal on the green.»

Consumers are spending more time playing games; they're also becoming more willing to make in - game purchases — spending real money to buy, say, new weapons for their fictional characters — enabling some companies to replace a dependency on new hits with a steady, recurring revenue stream.

While the final sum of spending for the Games was reported to have been $ 51 billion, Baade estimates the figure at much closer to $ 70 billion — an amount that «eclipsed the sum total of all money spent on all previous winter Olympic games.»

This year's Olympic games is shaping up to be one big cupping club, with swimmer Pavel Sankovich and U.S. gymnast Alexander Naddour — who told USA Today the therapy is «better than any money I've spent on anything else» — also competing with visible, bruise - colored disks.

Men are three times as likely than women to spend money on video games.

Up to 90 percent of money spent on mobile goes to games, he said.

He noted that — since spending on hockey generally comes out of people's disposable income — money not spent hockey games would be likely spent on other forms of entertainment.

Here was a new game that would incorporate long - tired property Spyro the Dragon with a business model that requires people to continually spend money on plastic figurines, on top of buying the initial software and proprietary hardware.

The Ohio Valley will spend about $ 75,000 of its own money to produce five league games that ESPN will broadcast live on Fridays at midnight and on Saturdays at 11:30 p.m. (EST).

I'm going to repeat what I said earlier... this team actively pursued a policy to undermine the relationship between the fans and the best player on this team... for all intent and purposes this is a traitorous act... so instead of spending money, which all pundits and fans agreed was necessary in order to compete at the highest levels, this club was wasting time and money trying to turn fans against Sanchez long before the end of the season (the real concerted effort started around the time that Wenger benched him for the start of the Liverpool game)... for a team that pertains to be different, like a FAMILY, and constantly questions the tactics of it's opponents, to engage in such a treasonous act is deplorable

Boycotting the games could be the best thing but unfortunately some people like to moan like little children and they can not make the sacrifice themselves, too many idiots spending money on AFC.

To say it isn't effective is talking BS, it is prob the most effective thing we supporters could do but it wont happen because of people like you who want people to spend money and go to games, spend a bit more on banners and go pay AFC # 60 to hold a #SilentStanOut sign or whatever.

Ok then Muff let's hope Coqhelin has the next 2 games and after the City one which will still be in the window of new players make your judgement then His last 2half games shows he is now better and deserves his place even before Arteta or Flamini both are passed it so let's give Coqhelen a fair go, he has really not put a foot wrong I would rather money be spent on a left sided player Left back and Center back for The BFG CB

If spending money on a new i - Phone X is ahead of $ 85.00 for a day tailgating and your alma mater's fb game fine.