Not exact matches
Furthermore, the
spending requirements placed on a
national government are far more extensive than those faced
by a state legislature.
The ECB makes
governments unable to finance their
spending by central banks of their own Introduction of the euro in 1999 explicitly prevented the ECB or any
national central bank from financing
government deficits.
In my recent
National Post column, I make reference to some back - of - envelope calculations to the effect that replacing the fiscal anchor of balanced budgets to one of a fixed debt - GDP ratio allows the federal
government to increase
spending by 1.2 percentage points of GDP, or
by about $ 25 billion.
The Liberal
government spends only five per cent of the province's GDP on agri - food (far below the
national average of 14 per cent), cut thesuccessful Buy B.C. program, and in 2009 cut theAgriculture and Lands budget
by 25.4 per cent.
The
national debt is the total amount owed
by the
government and should not be confused with the federal budget deficit, the annual amount
by which federal
spending exceeds revenue.
Government is also
by far business's biggest customer; it now
spends one out of every three or three and a half dollars of the gross
national product.
However, we rarely hear an ethical critique of the whole principle of an all - embracing welfare state controlled
by a
government that
spends nearly half of
national income on it.
As shown in Figure 3, for more than two decades Medicaid
spending in New York and nationwide rose at a pace well above the general cost indicator for state and local
governments; the near doubling of the price index between 1991 and 2011 was more than matched
by the greater than quadrupling of
national Medicaid costs and an approximately 350 percent increase in New York's Medicaid expenses.7 (The more rapid growth in other states likely reflected their expansion of eligibility, which New York had already implemented.)
With millions of pounds being
spent by large parties looking to form
national governments, a fine of # 20,000 is no longer a strong enough deterrent to ensure the rules are properly followed.»
The Senate President condemned the practice where agencies of
government spend money without statutory approval
by the
National Assembly and ruled that the issue be debated and resolution taken
by the Senate on Wednesday.
The other key area is the post hoc scrutiny of
government spending achieved
by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), acting on the reports of the independent
National Audit Office, the UK's «supreme audit institution» (or SAI).
After all, Labour have
spent the past five years criticising a whole series of cuts
by the coalition
government at both a
national and local level.
The figures released
by the Office of
National Statistics (ONS) cast doubt on the
government's claims that private sector job creation will spark into life despite the impact of the
spending review.
Rather than the top - down approach of the previous
government, with
government spending limits set
by the Treasury, Osborne told MPs the coalition would bring together all parts of society for what he called the «greatest
national challenge of our generation».
If they revise down the Treasury's growth forecasts
by 1 per cent of
national income, the gap between tax revenues and
spending increases
by around # 10bn, meaning the
government has to find more money from somewhere.
The Lisbon Agenda, a plan laid out in the Portuguese capital in 2000 to boost Europe's economy
by 2010, makes research a key driver for growth, calling on member countries to
spend 3 % of their gross
national products on research and development — half from industry and half from
government sources.
Lawyer Philip Cooney, a CEQ chief of staff and a 15 - year veteran of the American Petroleum Institute,
spent the first term of the administration editing science reports from various agencies on climate change to downplay the role of greenhouse gas emissions — emphasizing elements of uncertainty from a 2001
National Research Council report on climate change, according to an investigation
by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform.
Approved in 2007, the original COMPETES legislation committed the
government to providing healthy funding for the
National Science Foundation (NSF), the
National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Department of Energy's Office of Science, while also setting
government - wide
spending priorities to be coordinated
by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
There are other ways to try to create incentives for greater support of science
by industry,
by philanthropy; and those ought to be pursued too because I think the record shows that we simply can't depend entirely on the Federal
government — especially in view of the kind of fluctuations that result from either depressions in the
national treasury; that result from reductions and tax revenues; or the expenditures sometimes unexpected like Katrina; or unfortunate expenditures like the ones we are
spending now in Iraq.
The next day the federal
government nudged the high - energy physics community into the winners» circle
by announcing plans to
spend roughly $ 136 million over 5 years on operations and upgrades at the
national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics.
Discretionary
spending, which is the only part of the budget that Congress and the White House can control from year to year, accounted for just 29 % of the nearly $ 4 trillion the
government will
spend this year (the green slice in this pie chart, prepared
by the nonprofit
National Priorities Project).
It places a binding cap on discretionary
spending, which accounts for roughly one - third of the $ 3.5 trillion that the federal
government spends annually (the other two - thirds goes to entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security, other kinds
spending required
by law, and paying interest on the
national debt).
Washington — Compared with what they would have received if fiscal 1981 federal
spending policies had remained in effect, state and local
governments have lost $ 42 billion in federal assistance since President Reagan assumed office, according to a new analysis
by a
national public employees» union.
Maybe his time, given his varying roles, would be better
spent a. Getting his Trust to produce a detailed case - study with a breakdown of all the cost - savings made, for other schools to scrutinise and benchmark against... and b. actually making sure that the folk setting up his much trumpeted «
national deals brokered
by the
government to help schools save money on energy bills and hardware like printers and photocopiers» do a better job.
The
National Audit Office also warned in 2016 that the
government would have
spent almost # 1 billion on bursaries for new teachers
by this year, without their effectiveness being properly evaluated.
Angela Rayner, the shadow education secretary, pressed Gibb on the
government's
spending plans and Carol Monaghan, the Scottish
National Party's education spokesperson, demanded «urgent confirmation» on how ministers will stand
by their manifesto pledge to make sure no school has its budget cut.
Focuses on the performance of the economy as a whole
by analyzing such important issues as unemployment, inflation, recessions,
government spending and taxation, poverty and inequality, budget deficits and
national debts.
Although sovereign debt will always involve default risk, lending money to a
national government in the country's own currency is referred to as a risk - free investment because with limits, the debt can be repaid
by the borrowing
government by raising their taxes, reducing
spending, or simply printing more money.
If even Bjorn Lomborg sees the merits of the world
spending $ 100 billion a year to address global warming, is there anyone who can find a downside to raising a grand total of $ 35 million a year (beyond money already committed
by national governments) to protect 42 «source sites» — areas of tiger territory with populations that are sufficiently healthy to repopulate neighboring regions with suitable, but tiger-less, habitat?
-- Energy Future Coalition, Letter to Pres. Bush
by 31 former
national security advisors; report did not address PHEVs, but newly - aware speakers at press conference supported «plug power» PHEVs and a
government commitment to
spend $ 1B on lighter, fuel - efficient vehicles.
Between 1978 and 2000, the federal
government spent about $ 1.5 billion on oil and gas production research, much of it on extracting fuel from shale, according to a 2001 report
by the
National Academy of Sciences.
With the world economy in shambles, and nearly all
national governments awash in debt, there is diminishing incentive for politicians to
spend scarce public funds on the much - hyped hypothetical future «threats» posed
by global warming — especially when there are very real, tangible issues demanding immediate attention and funding.
The approval of the defense
spending bill called the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) may lead to the mainstream adoption of Blockchain technology
by government agencies in the US.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says that the measure before the U.S. House to reform and reauthorize the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) would not change the amount
spent by the
government over the next 10 years.