Sentences with phrase «spending money on players»

Is the plan that they really fear spending the money on players, so they low - ball other teams in the hopes they'll say no, and the club can tell the fans: «Hey, we tried for Jagielka and Cahill, but it didn't work out.

Name me another manager in the world who bargain buys in January when he SHOULD be spending money on players that will help us finish in the top 4, do well in the UCL, and win a trophy this season.

«But that doesn't mean spending for the sake of it, we take a talent - led not money - led approach to signings, spending money on players who don't contribute is incredibly damaging».?

Or how Usmanov offered to loan us the debt at a interest free rate and over a longer period so we can keep spending money on players to compete...

Teams don't like spending money on players, only to discover that they're getting worse.

I get all the crap about the board not spending money on players and Wenger need to go, which are both true but as a fan I definitely want to watch my team playing in the CL.

And anyway saying that we have only really spent # 21million is pointless, arsenal have money to spend anyway, there's no point spending money on players we don't need just because we havent spent all this so called budget that everyone seems to think they know exactly what amount we have to spend.

That's totally irrelevant to this story plus facilities are being upgraded and we are spending money on players and wages.

we are spending OUR hard earned money not OIL money.we are spending money on players we need unlike them buying players such as Lukaku, van ginkel, De bryne and loaning them out when clearly they did nt even need them in the first place so selling them would obviously make money back if you are looking at net spent.

The whole lot of them are to blame Wenger, Gazidis, Kroenke, Dick Law etc because it's clear they all agree on this senseless transfer policy that Arsenal are using, Arsenal are a very rich club but they refuse to spend money on the players we need, our spine of CF and CB is not strong and if Coquelin gets injured no one else can play the DM role like him!

I would much like us to spend money on a player that will actually feature for most of the season not someone who'll link up with Diaby in the medic room, Hummels is a great player but his recent injury record is definitely not what we need.

First, he assumes that Arsenal can just spend money on players like Man City and Chelsea.

Wenger has no tactics, plays his favourite players over better players, gives long term contracts to average and injury prone players, hates strong physical players, plays players out of position, always looking for excuse like refrees and saying other teams played more in pre season, does nt spend money on players required like if we need strikers he will buy CAM, waits for other teams to buy top players and signs average on deadline day, calls accident when we lose, talks cohesion and mental strength when we beat terrible teams and win mickey mouse trophy like Asia cup and community shield.

They have repeatedly demonstrated that for one they are not willing to do what needs to be done to challenge for the title be it spend money on players or organise the players to defend better.

There are three position players left in the Padres» lineup from last year, and they've added a one - year contract (Upton) and spent money on players whose value is almost certainly weighted toward the present (Kemp, Shields).

Juve hardly spent any money on players when u look at their squad.

All that being said, I wouldn't be surprised if the UCL was being used by Wenger to force the board into spending the money on the player he thinks he needs.

And would it really have killed Wenger to spend some money on a player that might have helped us to achieve the goal we all want to achieve?

Spend money on players that sell jerseys (a DM sells no jerseys but I blame Wenger for not finding a proper wall / DM to shield the Defense in at least 10 years).

I wish Arsenal was willing to spend money on player transfers like they are on Wenger contracts.

The new owner unlike City and Chelsea does not spend money on players.

It's not like Maureen, Citeh, Madrid, Barca, PSG, etc and any other team who has needs doesn't spend money on players.

wenger said we would get defensive signings in quality and quantity and he also said we would spend the money on players that is better than what we got welbeck is no better than sanogo so no upgrade there really and am really surprised that united would deal with us at all

Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing is going to be around 220 million or less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal worth around 130 million (wether or not it was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation

Whenever Aguero or Kompany are out they struggle badly even though they spend money on players for backup.

«At the moment, we are in a position where they force you to spend money on a player who sometimes you have identified.

Yeah they've spent money on players they don't need.

Instead of plating it safe and re-upping the contract of a player like Walcott that says: overrated spend that money on a player that says worth it cause with that much a week you could open talks with any marquee player bare a few

I do not see him at everton after this summer, so please Arsene, Silent Stan... forget xhaka, or mkhitaryan and spend the money on the player we need most.

He is right though, to allow the incompetent old dinosaur to spend money on players is a waste.

«I found a sad club,» Mourinho said, adding that United had got rid of players he would never have sold and also spent money on players that he would never have bought.

Not exact matches

«If he's so concerned about the financial health of his players,» wrote Merrill, «maybe he should spend more of the millions he has made / makes from League of Legends on paying them instead of investing in other e-sports where he is losing money.»

You can also try to contact leading media players and recommend your book or actually send them a copy, you can spend some small amounts of money in advertising your book on a limited number of websites, you can do direct mail advertising by contacting thousands of US bookstores and so on.

Zaha is replacing Walcott but honestly # 35m is a lot of money for Wenger to spend on a replacement player, so I doubt this transfer is more than just a rumour.

I think it's fantastic that we spend big money on Özil and Alexis, two world class players, yet Aaron Has emerged as, in my opinion, our main man.

Seen through the eyes of Wenger he just spends a boat load of money on Xhaka and with playing 3 at the back we will be playing with 5 defenders if you include the wingbacks, add Xhaka (or Coq or Elneney) and you have 6 defensive minded players, leaving 4 attackers.

No style or anything really, average players we spend big money on like XAKhA... That» is not a football anymore club but a business...

No mention of the massive cash reserves that the club has built up there I see or the fact that we would be a lot happier paying the high prices if we could see the money being spent on players rather than put in a big pile to earn interest.

we have put up with excuses now for many years, the best excuse of them all was the new stadium and the fact that we had no money to spend on players.

Theres no need of spending such shitload of money on a player we don't need and he isn't quality..

The laca signing was one to appease the fans, looks like they've spent money but they've just spent enough to not go over there stinging budget — not saying he's a bad player but there was better on offer / looks like a younger Defoe type player to me..

Palace can not afford to spend such large sums of money on players every week, whom in reality are probably more like reserve quality than starting eleven, especially at Arsenal.

So even though Man City, Liverpool and Man United are all doing just as badly as Arsenal and a lot worse if you consider how much more money they have spent, it seems to be Wenger who is always in the press, on the verge of being sacked and with players and staff supposedly disagreeing with every decision the Prof makes.

I'm going to repeat what I said earlier... this team actively pursued a policy to undermine the relationship between the fans and the best player on this team... for all intent and purposes this is a traitorous act... so instead of spending money, which all pundits and fans agreed was necessary in order to compete at the highest levels, this club was wasting time and money trying to turn fans against Sanchez long before the end of the season (the real concerted effort started around the time that Wenger benched him for the start of the Liverpool game)... for a team that pertains to be different, like a FAMILY, and constantly questions the tactics of it's opponents, to engage in such a treasonous act is deplorable

Honestly i do nt really care if walcott leaves or not,, i really care if Mr. oldskool Grandpa will spend money on quality players e.g Quality Striker A must..

This will fester on and on till we get rid of the real problem WENGER hes the cause of our demise why does the board still support him he must have big friends on the board any other manager would have been sacked years ago but not Wenger does he run the club or what????? And Ozil the useless German hes the worst player on the field no commitment, and along with a few others he should be sold we have the money, months ago it was said we had in excess of 160 million to spend where did that go we only spent 50 m.

In Wengers first 8 trophy winning years we never spent more than 13mil on a player, so to suggest we've needed vast sums of money to compete is just ignoring everything we are as a football club.

and english players are the if we analyze the salary to performance... a garbage rooney has been earning 300k for... basically NOTHING, it is annoying but its because of you people that some managers do nt like to spend a lot of money... if lacazette came for 60 mio pounds and on 150k and if he flopped you would bash and reiterate that ON EVERY SECOND ARTICLEon 150k and if he flopped you would bash and reiterate that ON EVERY SECOND ARTICLEON EVERY SECOND ARTICLE!!

Why we spent 35 M on Xhaka I will never understand - we needed mid field backups and not a first team player this season worth that much money.

West ham have sold their stadium and have the money available to spend on players plus extra income from ticket sales due to leasing the olympic stadiun for a peppercorn rent.