Sentences with phrase «spending on climate change mitigation»

Not exact matches

On the basis of the science, governments across the world will be spending trillions of pounds on climate change mitigatioOn the basis of the science, governments across the world will be spending trillions of pounds on climate change mitigatioon climate change mitigation.

I've spent my whole professional life working on climate change and would prefer it if we could deal with global warming by mitigation alone.

Before any further dollars are spent on climate change adaptation and / or mitigation, the world needs to upgrade their global weather / climate reporting network to the USCRN standard so that policymakers have correct temperature change mesurements to base their decisions on.

The likelihood of Australia being invaded by a foreign power this century is probably less than 30 per cent, yet we spend and will go on spending more on defence than on any conceivable climate change mitigation policy.

Countries are spending countless billions of dollars annually on faulty to fraudulent IPCC climate models and studies that purport to link every adverse event or problem to manmade climate change; subsidized renewable energy programs that displace food crops and kill wildlife; adaptation and mitigation measures against future disasters that exist only in «scenarios» generated by the IPCC's GIGO computer models; and welfare, food stamp and energy assistance programs for the newly unemployed and impoverished.

Friends of Science Society says trillions of dollars are being diverted to climate change initiatives, such as wind and solar farms, when that money would be better spent on adaptation, flood mitigation, and reserve funds set - up for post-hurricane restoration programs.

«The science says that spending precious dollars for climate change mitigation on forestry is high - risk:» I disagree, and Spending on atmospheric & Biospheric research is impspending precious dollars for climate change mitigation on forestry is high - risk:» I disagree, and Spending on atmospheric & Biospheric research is impSpending on atmospheric & Biospheric research is imperative.

«The science says that spending precious dollars for climate change mitigation on forestry is high - risk: We don't know that it would cool the planet, and we have good reason to fear it might have precisely the opposite effect.

A report from the London School of Economics» Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment says that climate change mitigation should be an essential part of stimulus money, and may need as much as $ 400 billion of extra public spending on «green» energy and development projects worldwide over the nexClimate Change and the Environment says that climate change mitigation should be an essential part of stimulus money, and may need as much as $ 400 billion of extra public spending on «green» energy and development projects worldwide over the nextChange and the Environment says that climate change mitigation should be an essential part of stimulus money, and may need as much as $ 400 billion of extra public spending on «green» energy and development projects worldwide over the nexclimate change mitigation should be an essential part of stimulus money, and may need as much as $ 400 billion of extra public spending on «green» energy and development projects worldwide over the nextchange mitigation should be an essential part of stimulus money, and may need as much as $ 400 billion of extra public spending on «green» energy and development projects worldwide over the next year.