Zaha is replacing Walcott but honestly # 35m is a lot of money for Wenger to
spend on a replacement player, so I doubt this transfer is more than just a rumour.
It's okay though, I'm sure the BCS has plenty of money to
spend on a replacement, after all, it wasn't the Crystal Football that broke (like Alabama did last year).
Amazing what can happen when given a good run in the first - team: S A lot is dependant on what system and manager we play... how much they're willing to
spend on a replacement / upgrade and if we're replacing both Sanchez (certain) and ozil and oxlade (50/50 imo).
Whatever we get for Alexis will prob need to be
spent on his replacement, but I don't think it will be.
For example, if teachers are hired without having been fully prepared, the much higher turnover rates that result are costly in terms of both dollars
spent on the replacement process and decreases in student achievement in high - turnover schools.
are costly in terms of both dollars
spent on the replacement process and decreases in student achievement.
Early naysayers claimed that every dime saved in fuel would be
spent on replacement batteries.
And, more than likely you do not have that kind of money sitting in your bank account to
spend on the replacement of these items.
Not exact matches
The term «newcomers» is code for a couple of demographic subsets, one being women, the other aging boomers — people with time
on their hands,
replacement hips and money to
spend.
This means you'll
spend more
on replacements.
Penney customers were bolting, with no sign of
replacements, despite millions
spent on new marketing that depicted white - picket - fence Americana with great prices and gorgeous products.
Sometimes it's just plain smart to
spend more money
on a quality product that will last and not accrue quick
replacement costs.
Not only are you losing that average $ 6.30
spent on groceries for homemade fare, but you're incurring another $ 11.14 to purchase a
replacement takeout meal.
One solar - powered Little Sun light lasts for two to three years before needing a battery
replacement, and can save households up to 90 % over three years compared to what they would have
spent on kerosene.
But as I write this 2 days before the transfer window closes the Gunners have so far
spent approx 10 million
on Debuchy (a direct
replacement for Sagna), 4 million
on Ospina (who takes Fabianski's place) while the Vermaelen money was used to bring in Chambers.
We can Consider him sold then and I very much doubt that this fee will be
spent on a decent
replacement.
haven't seen one of those in awhile apart from fabragas, cant see wenger splashing a big amount
on replacement no a position he likes to
spend much
on, unless he gets a cheap
replacement stopgap again.
At least they had managers who were able to buck the trendno, they
spend what they bring in, i» e they sell a player but buy
replacements, Wenger
on the otherhand doesn't replace our top players when they leave
I find it hard to believe Arsenal would
spent around # 50 million
on a player, and agree to not use the player, or say anything until Monaco have a
replacement.
It looks like PSG are going to win the race to sign Cabaye and could pay around # 20 million for midfielder, meaning Newcastle have plenty of money to
spend on the Frenchman's
replacement.
What we can hope for is that the club
spends at least 70 % of Sanchez's transfer money
on a semi-proper
replacement.
He is more important to us than Pogba to Man U. Do the math of
replacement cost for Sanchez and compare to the cost of wage increase and you realize it is a no brainer to pay him 300 per week rather than to
spend 100 million
on buy a
replacement player who probably either doesn't exist or doesn't want to play for Arsene.
Klopp's situation makes me respect Wenger even more BVB have only really sold 2 superstars well maybe 3 but they got Kagawa back (not that he was a superstar at Man U) but they've got a really strong squad and they've
spend a lot of money
on replacements for the likes of lewandowski.
Getting 1 guy in this draft that can come in and be the insurance /
replacement for Foster is more than enough to
spend on a position that is only the # 5 or 6 most important in the defensive scheme that the 49ers run.
I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable
replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple
replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't
spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable
replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players,
on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew
But as much as all this is good for Bellerin and well earned, it has also reminded his boyhood club Barcelona, where he
spent eight years in the youth system, of his ability and with the departure of their Brazilian defender Dani Alves
on the cards, Bellerin's name has started to be mentioned as a possible
replacement.
I think Wenger prefers Morata as the long term Giroud
replacement and would rather not
spend 30 mill
on Lacazette who he values at 15 - 20 mill.
Debuchy pointed out again how not to
spend 10 million
on a right back and it's depressing how we need Bellerin and Coquelin to fill two positions when we have zero options there, when instead any decent top club would look at adequate
replacements.
Flopcao is drogbas
replacement, drogbas was almost the third choice striker so I excpect to see flopcao
spending most of his time at Chelsea
on the bench.most importantly we have got cech, mourinho having nightmares about this.he knows we are the strongest team to challenge them.
Spend the money
on a
replacement for Cazola and show confidence and support for Perez by giving him game time.
I would cut my losses and move him out and
spend on a better
replacement like William Carvalho, who we should have signed two years ago.
All the cash we bring in never gets
spent on decent
replacements anyway!
Arsenal RARELY
spend big
on 1 player with # 100 million war chest; our best player leaves
on free # 60 million walking out the door forget about top
replacement.
I agree, we COULD improve the DM position for cover, but Coquelin is looking VERY good at the moment and
spending 25m
on a
replacement would be silly... as would doing the same
on cover.
We need to
spend big «bucks»
on replacements for Alexis, Ozil and new CMs - sell Xhaka and Walcott too.
Wenger has achieved a huge amount for the club and although some of it was set prior to his arrival and some of it was an extension of his initial success the fact that winds up most of the anti wenger fans is that the club IS
spending money and IS trying to rebuild after a long time in the wilderness, but when it comes to the
spending on players its always the CHEAPER option in the most important area's Chips Keswick Boasted a # 100» 000 000 war chest during last summers closed season and stated that the club could buy any player they wished (Apart from the worlds top players at that point Messi) yet instead of
spending the money in area's that needed drastic improvement Wenger opted for the cheaper
replacements and
spent just over half of the money allocated.
The manager although having financial restrictions have found funds to
spend on Cazorla, Ozil and Sanchez in that order, but still have not fill positions which are essential to chasing the title, I fear Wenger does not buy proper
replacements, because it jeopardizes the development of his young guns (which are his personal projects)
Wenger was perhaps shivering in the wrong way, hadn't gone out and
spent available funds
on suitable
replacement attire, should have deployed his subs as barriers from the cold?
Apart from this one signing AW will likely
spend his time ensuring all necessary players are out
on loan and maybe the odd
replacement for players we may lose, (monreal, cazorla etc).
SEE MORE: Chelsea transfer gossip Chelsea to seal incredible record - breaking # 35m deal for INSTANT John Terry
replacement Chelsea to
SPEND # 83m
on trio as Blues splash the cash to get season back
on track
Unless AFC announces a strong manager
replacement with some $ $ to
spend, you can bet the players
on last year contracts WILL be gone, Wilshere included!
As long we
spend the money,
on good
replacements I would sell any player who doesn't want to play for Arsenal Football Club.
even iwobi if given the chance will be much better than mahrez, dribbling, speed, just need to improve his decision making and not be timid in front of goal, if we are
spending 40 million I would rather it be
on a cazorla
replacement not an area where we got loads of players and still haven't sold any.
Just because Giroud is injured he will not
spend # 40 million and # 150k a week
on a
replacement.
Liverpool could
spend big
on a blockbuster name as they hunt a
replacement for Philippe Coutinho, who joined Barcelona in January.
United's group is by no means a breeze — Shaktar lost some great players in the summer but
spent 60 mil
on replacements.
With # 102m available to
spend right away, while another # 40m will arrive in performance - based add -
ons, Liverpool will be under pressure to reinvest with an adequate
replacement.
That'll be apart from being the «biggest club in the world» as they constantly tell everyone, the hundreds of millions
spent on the very eleven who were
on the pitch last night, and the fact that they were playing a team from League 2 who couldn't even afford to let their players swap shirts at the end unless they bought their own
replacements.
Although Arteta proved to be worth more than the sum
spent on him as he was one of the key players for the club last season, still the gunner fans did expect a world class
replacement.
Now they've
spent money
on a
replacement from Hull City.