Sentences with phrase «spending out of investments»

Put another way, in order for the holder of any security of spend out of that investment, the security has to be sold to another investor who locks in the identical amount of funds (Iron Law of Equilibrium).

Not exact matches

Hiring an accountant or CFO is one of the best investments to ensure that your business doesn't run out of money because of improper spending.

A down round of funding after poor spending choices made with initial investment rounds will not turn out well for the entrepreneur.

Part of that investment is spent, as always, in the form of a broker commission, but the rest goes to the lessee as free rent and tenant - improvement, or build - out, allowance.

Meanwhile, there are a few activities out there that are the temporal equivalent of that awesome 100X investment, activities that if you spend mere minutes on them early in the day, will pay you back with vastly more energy and productivity later on.

Combined with a decrease in personal income tax, a sales tax would lead to increased investment and economic diversification while capturing spending from out - of - province visitors, argued Dylan Jones, president of the Canada West Foundation, a Calgary - based think - tank.

The company has spent most of the past year working toward this blockbuster quarter, while making heavy investments in its manufacturing processes in preparation of the launch of the Model 3 electric vehicle, which is expected to roll out by the end of next year.

If Cali pays out tons into federal coffers and Alabama receives that, then Cali loses real earnings regardless of what investment levels are unless it's infrastructure spending, in which case it's not a zero - sum game where everyone can benefit.

So I took the money out of my retirement investments and spent it» recalls Jackie Beck, the blogger behind The Debt Myth.

He's made a career out of defying the odds, and his «Trumponomics» recipe of cutting taxes and hiking spending is meant to spur so much additional business investment that productivity can hit record levels.

Envy Ratio - envy ratio is a calculation used after a buy out of a company... This entails finding out how much the management company spent, versus the investment company, and then examining how much equity each party received... The envy ratio is very similar to the concept of leverage.

«Since 2010, spending on mental health has risen to a record # 11.6 billion this year, with a further investment of # 1 billion every year by 2020/21 and we expect CCGs to increase their spending as set out in NHS England's Five Year Forward View.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

its not simply the case of we want this guy so he will come, there is the issue of intrest on the players behalf, we may want the player be he may not want to leave and then the one key factor money... See we have money to go out and spend but unlike the dumbasses that consider spending near enough # 60 million on Fabian Delph and Raheem sterling as a good investment..

AFC do not need the funds from Alexis if they would spend some of the savings they have generated over the many years, they can not dip into funds like that every year but this year we dropped out of UCL and needed an injection of investment...

It is rather unfortunate that us fans suffer from not winning any major trophy over the years.What Leicester did was just one off, it will not happen for the next few decades.Football is all about investment, to win u have to invest well with some luck.Everton did look at where they are now.We are not at the level of Real, Barca Manu u name them.The big clubs invest heavily and still get some return on their investment.Arsenal will not spend like city or chelsea or PSG.We will go down like Leeds.Let us be honest with ourselves, if u were the owner of this club u will never sack Wenger.He brings u lot of money year in year out.

In some circumstances, by spending just a little bit of time and creativity you can get a great return on investment, as one artist and illustrator found out.

You will never run out of diapers, have to take out diaper trash, or spend money on diapers after your initial investment.

To term the «creation» of jobs out of thin air by spending tax revenues on wages (often paid to economic migrants creating new load on pubic services) an «investment» is an economic deceit.

That is why we will introduce an emergency budget in 2015 to reject Tory spending plans for 2015/16 and beyond and set out how we will pursue a policy of investment for jobs and growth.»

In that time, New York has raised taxes, created a culture of out of control state spending, increased regulatory burdens, and stood by as thousands of New York businesses have closed, moved out of state or endured economic hardships that have forced them to reduce their investment in our economy and eliminate private - sector jobs.

Lawmakers are also skeptical of Cuomo's promise to balance the budget — without big spending increases — while still funding many of the pricey proposals he laid out in his state of the state, which include upgrades to airports, big investments in economic development and increases in spending on education and workforce development.

Out of office Heseltine called for money, including the receipts from council house sales, to be spent on infrastructure investment instead of tax cuts.

The sheer magnitude of continued «unspecified» spending cuts forced by the two percent spending cap — $ 1.7 billion in fiscal year 2017, $ 3.3 billion in 2018, and $ 4.8 billion in 2019 — will inevitably starve our schools and public universities and prevent our state from making the investments needed to expand opportunities for those struggling to lift themselves out of poverty.

The sheer magnitude of continued spending cuts forced by the two percent spending cap — $ 1.7 billion in FY2017, $ 3.3 in FY2018, and $ 4.8 in FY2019 — although particular program areas are unspecified today, will inevitably starve our schools and public universities and prevent our state from making the investments needed to expand opportunities for those struggling to lift themselves out of poverty.

And then there is the much bigger rump that could not get access to good schools (down under Labour), good apprenticeships / sponsoring companies, also down under Labour and lastly betrayed by a Labour Govt that seems to think spending vast amounts of money on snooping campaigns to catch benefit cheats is a better investment than educating and reskilling the un-employed, who on going out to do the jobs that must be done find themselves up against foreign labour sometimes willing to work the most brutal conditions (and maybe less than min wage because it is still better than home).

This extra investment gives the party an opportunity to spell out the benefits of this extra spending in terms that can be explained to voters on the doorstep.

Obama also gave a shout out to Subra Suresh, marking his first day as director of the National Science Foundation; plugged the Administration's spending on STEM education; and highlighted a private - sector initiative, called Changing the Equation, in which hundreds of companies and organizations are adding their dollars to public investments in science education.

The 10 - year cycle for the census requires steady annual investments in new approaches and technologies, followed by a huge spending ramp up in the final few years to implement everything needed for census day and the extensive follow - up of those who haven't answered out the 10 - question survey.

We need to invest in those areas,» said Toby Smith of the Association of American Universities, which laid out the concept of «investment» and «non-investment» spending earlier this year in testimony to the commission.

When I do buy something trendy I always try to make sure it is affordable and spend my money on the investment pieces that I know won't go out of style.

Schools for several years continue to pay out their previous level of energy spending, and the firms recoup their investment from the difference between that amount and the new, lower costs.

* If cost is a concern, go with the next - to - latest (instead of the latest) technology — although if you want to get four or five years out of your computer, extra dollars spent now will end up being a good investment.

Among them are deleterious effects on children of unregulated and often substandard childcare; [9] lost productivity for employers due to parents missing work to handle gaps in childcare or to care for a sick child; [10] lost wages and reduced retirement benefits for parents who have to drop out of the labor market to provide at - home care for their young children; [11] a substantial downward pressure on the wages of childcare workers with effects on the quality and stability of the childcare workforce; [12] and lost opportunities for further education, [13] college savings, and other investments that working parents could make in themselves and their children but can not afford because they are spending most or all of their disposable income on childcare.

«College is a huge investment of time, not just resources, and we need to make sure our kids are getting the most out of every second they spend in school.»

Part of me remembered when the Labour Government announced the Building Schools for the Future programme and said that billions upon billions (which it turned out we didn't have) would be spent to «reverse decades of neglect and under - investment» which I had always thought referred to the Councils of every hue who were responsible for maintaining school buildings.

«Clearly, exhibitors spend a good deal of time, money and other resources to exhibit at the SEMA Show, so they need to get the most they can out of those investments.

(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.

There are people out there, and we've met plenty of them, who spend hours every week sweating over their investments.

As he explains in his book, The Behavior Gap, selecting investments should come at the end of the planning process, not the beginning: «You would never spend time researching and debating whether to travel by plane, train, or car until you figured out where you are going.»

It makes a lot of sense to protect your investment up front and know what your are buying instead of finding out later that you have to spend a large amount of money to fix problems after the closing.

As you map out your financial future based on both short and long - term goals, there are a variety of money managing vehicles you can use to get from point A to point B. You'll be mapping out budgeting, saving, spending and investments, and the strategy used for each can get a little confusing.

If you spend, that makes your RRSP investment out - of - pocket cost $ 600, but both investments start at $ 1000.

As I have pointed out in previous letters, each investment the Fund makes has something wrong with it, and we spend a lot of time trying to figure out what is wrong and worrying about it.

It meant liquidating most of my $ 26k taxable investment account (I know, I know... it was mostly cash at the time at least), taking a chunk out of liquid savings, and being extra vigilant about spending.

So I took the money out of my retirement investments and spent it» recalls Jackie Beck, the blogger behind The Debt Myth.

As long as you spend your HSA funds on qualified medical expenses, you won't be taxed, making this investment one of the best out there.

After checking out the cost ratio of the mutual funds in the program and then realizing that by using the goal - directed investment model provided, I was probably spending even more than the 1.6 - 2 % cost ratio of the individual funds, decided it was time to take more control of my investment direction and stop being lazy.

With not a huge amount of time to spend on following my investments, I am trying to figure out the best approach.

If you were to liquidate all your investments upon reaching retirement and spend 4 % plus inflation each year, you may run out of money prematurely.