But they would bring down
spending over the course of a parliament.
Not exact matches
-- Member
of Parliament David Yurdiga «The federal government thinks that it is acceptable to run a $ 30 billion deficit and
spending billions on foreign aid and international climate change projects, as well as on newcomer settlement programs all the while cutting
over $ 100 million from the three northern territories
over the
course of the next five years.
Specifically, the manifesto argues for an end to austerity: the SNP proposal is for a 0.5 % annual increase in public
spending over the
course of the next
parliament, rather than the reductions in
spending which George Osborne laid out in his March 2015 budget.
[51] Documents leaked from the Treasury the following month revealed that Osborne anticipated his tighter
spending would lead to 1.3 million jobs being lost
over the
course of the
parliament.
The IFS said that the Conservative plans to get rid
of «the bulk»
of the deficit
over the
course of the next
parliament will involve the biggest
spending cuts since the second world war, while Labour and Lib Dem plans will result in deeper cuts that at any time since the 1970s.
His claim that unemployment will fall rather than rise in the
course of this
Parliament is based on the OBR assessment, rapidly rushed out to give ammunition to contest the anticipated Harman attack (incidentally providing the first suspicions about the OBR's objectivity), that whilst 600,000 public sector jobs will be lost by 2015 - 6 and a similar figure (though unspecified) in the private sector as a result
of the public
spending cuts, some 2.5 m jobs will be created
over the same period in the private sector.
The CBI and Aecom have called for Government to reaffirm
spending plans and press ahead with implementing policy decisions to ensure projects are delivered in full
over the
course of this
Parliament.
We have therefore agreed that there will need to be: - a significantly accelerated reduction in the structural deficit
over the
course of a
Parliament, with the main burden
of deficit reduction borne by reduced
spending rather than increased taxes; - arrangements that will protect those on low incomes from the effect
of public sector pay constraint and other
spending constraints; and - protection
of jobs by stopping Labour's proposed jobs tax.
We will significantly accelerate the reduction
of the structural deficit
over the
course of a
Parliament, with the main burden
of deficit reduction born by reduced
spending rather than increased taxes.
According to the analysis, while the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats are all proposing to
spend more on 16 to 18 education
over the
course of the next
parliament, only Labour's
spending plans will result in a real - terms increase (8 per cent in real terms).
Even though school
spending has been protected
over the
course of this
parliament, the school estate challenge remains huge and will continue to grow.
The IFS says that, taking those together with pressures «on other costs», it forecasts school
spending per pupil will fall by 8 per cent in real terms
over the
course of this
Parliament.
The government now says it will end up
spending more than # 24 billion
over the
course of the
parliament on school capital funding.
The think tank says that although the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats are all proposing to
spend more on 16 to 18 education
over the
course of the next
parliament, only Labour's
spending plans will result in a real - terms increase.