Specifically, the manifesto argues for an end to austerity: the SNP proposal is for a 0.5 % annual increase in public
spending over the course of the next parliament, rather than the reductions in spending which George Osborne laid out in his March 2015 budget.
Not exact matches
-- Member
of Parliament David Yurdiga «The federal government thinks that it is acceptable to run a $ 30 billion deficit and
spending billions on foreign aid and international climate change projects, as well as on newcomer settlement programs all the while cutting
over $ 100 million from the three northern territories
over the
course of the
next five years.
The IFS said that the Conservative plans to get rid
of «the bulk»
of the deficit
over the
course of the
next parliament will involve the biggest
spending cuts since the second world war, while Labour and Lib Dem plans will result in deeper cuts that at any time since the 1970s.
According to the analysis, while the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats are all proposing to
spend more on 16 to 18 education
over the
course of the
next parliament, only Labour's
spending plans will result in a real - terms increase (8 per cent in real terms).
The think tank says that although the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats are all proposing to
spend more on 16 to 18 education
over the
course of the
next parliament, only Labour's
spending plans will result in a real - terms increase.