Sentences with phrase «spending per student in»

Spending per student in 16 - 18 education would remain about 10 % lower than it would be for secondary schools.

Notably, his study found that spending per student in a given state increased significantly along with the size of the private school sector, and it is this increased spending that leads to lower student / teacher ratios.

TIMSS does not include data on spending, so current national public spending per student in secondary education in international dollars was calculated on the basis of UNESCO and World Bank data.

«We are number one in spending per student in the country,» he said.

Some were told how much money is actually spent per student in their school, others were not.

The repair costs could make it look like an absurd amount is being spent per student in that old schoolhouse.

In any case, the higher costs put a major kink in the business side of the Madison Prep proposal and also made it less palatable to the district, which wants to limit the amount of money per student it puts into Madison Prep beyond what it spends per student in the rest of the district.

Potential ESAs would be equivalent to the state Quality Basic Education funds that would have been spent per student in public school, projected to be worth an estimated $ 4,500.

That's far less than the $ 13,000 Milwaukee public schools spent per student in 2012.

Not exact matches

There are long waiting lists for apprenticeships and trade programs belied by some of the highest per - capita spending in the state for city public school students.

During Raymond's academic years, Camden's schools spent about one - half as much per student as did schools in Princeton, New Jersey.

When she is invited to speak at places like Princeton and people try to argue that it makes little difference that Camden spends $ 4,000 and Princeton $ 8,000 per student, she retorts, «If you don't believe that money makes a difference, let your children go to school in Camden.

The Productivity Commission is correct that dollars spent per student increased by 14 % in real terms over the last decade.

My concern is that in this era of draconian state education budget cuts (here in Texas, we rank second to last in per - student spending), state agencies, under pressure from cash - strapped districts, might be far too liberal in allowing these exempt — but often quite lucrative — fundraisers.

New York for the fifth year in a row spent more money per student than any other state, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

The governor says while New York spends more per student than any state in the nation, high school graduation rates ranks at number 38 in the country.

The higher cost of fringe benefits is another reason why New York State tops the nation in education spending — $ 19,552 per student — nearly double the $ 10,608 national average.

New York spends more money per student than any other state in the country, and yet its schools yield mediocre education outcomes, such as test scores and graduation rates.

New York spends more on education per student than any other state in the nation, roughly twice the national average.

«The governor is fighting to reform a system that spends more money per student than any other state in the nation while condemning hundreds of thousands of children to failing schools over the last decade,» said Cuomo spokesman Rich Azzopardi.

New York spent $ 21,206 per pupil compared to a national average of $ 11,392 in school year 2014 - 2015.38 Better targeting spending to the highest needs districts would contain costs while ensuring that all students have access to a sound basic education.39 The State wastes $ 1.2 billion annually on property tax rebates and allocates $ 4 billion annually on economic development spending with a sparse record of results.40 Curtailing spending in these areas would reduce pressure to increase taxes and lessen the tax differential with other states.

In an email, a spokeswoman for Cuomo said, «The Governor is committed to enacting an aggressive reform agenda to fix New York's broken education system that spends more per pupil that any other state in the nation while condemning over 250,000 students to failing schools over the last decade.&raquIn an email, a spokeswoman for Cuomo said, «The Governor is committed to enacting an aggressive reform agenda to fix New York's broken education system that spends more per pupil that any other state in the nation while condemning over 250,000 students to failing schools over the last decade.&raquin the nation while condemning over 250,000 students to failing schools over the last decade.»

Education spending had peaked at an average of $ 11,621 per student in 2008 — 09 before the deep global recession caused states to slash their spending amid plummeting tax revenues.

The state spent about $ 218 per non-public student in Cuomo's first budget.

It did, however, note that by its calculations, New York spends more per student than any other state in the country, even as performance on standardized testing continues to lag.

The fact is that New York spends more on education per student than any other state in the union — an average $ 18,126 each, according to the latest federal data.

Enrollment numbers have decreased in both smaller districts in recent years and yet they continue to spend more on administrative costs per student than others.

YES — cut spending — NY pays double per capita to educate students than the average... one of the highest in the nation.

And a push for more oversight of per - school spending is seen as an effort to highlight school funding issues in New York City, silencing critics of the governor that he is not doing enough to help high - needs schools and students.

The mayor repeatedly declined to say how much the city currently spends per year on tuition for students who are approved for reimbursement for private school education, but according to the city's Independent Budget Office, the city is estimated to have paid out more than $ 200 million in reimbursements this year.

Nationwide, states spent an average of $ 6,903 per student on teacher salaries that year, compared to $ 14,769 in New York.

«The governor is fighting to reform a system that spends more money per student than any other state in the nation while condemning hundreds of thousands of children to failing schools over the last decade,» Azzopardi said.

The city's busing costs have spiked from $ 71 million in 1979 to $ 1.1 billion today, according to the Department of Education, which maintains the approximately $ 6,900 per student could be better spent in the classroom.

Over the last 15 years, spending on education in New York has more than doubled, from $ 28 billion to $ 58 billion, and we spend more per pupil than any other state in the nation, yet our students remain in the bottom half when it comes to results.

At the University of La Rochelle, where in the 1st year of the program students were recruited without having an assignment to start with, students spent an average of 2 days per week just trying to find a consulting opportunity, Canet says: «They found it difficult to manage their time between their thesis work and the search of company assignments.»

In comparison, per - capita spending has declined over the decade in nine of the 10 states with the largest number of students enrolled in public research universitieIn comparison, per - capita spending has declined over the decade in nine of the 10 states with the largest number of students enrolled in public research universitiein nine of the 10 states with the largest number of students enrolled in public research universitiein public research universities.

What's more, in the 1995 - 96 school year, the tiny, 260 - student Sausalito district that includes the school spent $ 12,100 per student, compared with $ 4,977 per pupil statewide.

Putting all of this together, the authors find that a 10 percent increase in institutional spending per student leads to a 3 percent increase in enrollment and even larger percentage increases in degree completion one to three years later.

They also do not differ significantly in their initial per - pupil spending, average class size, percentage of students receiving subsidized school lunches, percentage of students with limited English proficiency or disabilities, and the mobility of their student populations.

After controlling for average class size, per - pupil spending in 1998 - 99, the percentage of students with disabilities, the percentage of students receiving a free or reduced - price school lunch, the percentage of students with limited English proficiency, and student mobility rates, high - scoring F schools achieved gains that were 2.5 points greater than their below - average D counterparts in reading (see Figure 2).

Coleman found that variation in school resources (as measured by per - pupil spending and student - to - teacher ratios) was unrelated to variation in student achievement on standardized tests.

Utah ranks last in the nation in per - pupil spending, and Innovations gets the same relative pittance as Salt Lake City's conventional high schools: $ 3,100 per student for operating costs and $ 3,200 for facilities - related costs.

Importantly, as our results show, predicted increases in per - pupil spending induced by SFRs are correlated not only with actual spending increases, but with improved outcomes for students as well.

Because the local property tax base is typically higher in areas with higher home values, and there are persistently high levels of residential segregation by socioeconomic status, heavy reliance on local financing contributed to affluent districts» ability to spend more per student.

While there may be other mechanisms through which increased school spending improves student outcomes, these results suggest that the positive effects are driven, at least in part, by some combination of reductions in class size, having more adults per student in schools, increases in instructional time, and increases in teacher salaries that may help to attract and retain a more highly qualified teaching workforce.

Specifically, increasing per - pupil spending by 10 percent in all 12 school - age years increases the probability of high school graduation by 7 percentage points for all students, by roughly 10 percentage points for low - income children, and by 2.5 percentage points for nonpoor children.

An Education Week Research Center analysis of federal data shows spending levels per student in most U.S. school districts for fiscal year 2013.

For example, the fact that K12 schools spend $ 715 per student less on support services than public schools in the same states is interpreted as a «cost advantage» for the virtual schools.

Increased per - pupil spending also has a positive effect on exposed students» family income in adulthood.

Because the local property tax base is typically higher in areas with higher home values, and there are persistently high levels of residential segregation by socioeconomic status, heavy reliance on local financing enabled affluent districts to spend more per student.