Not exact matches
Especially given the complexities inherent in the world today (and therefore the depth of detail,
legal obscurities, and the like represented in actual legislation), the ordinary voter in a democracy may find his or her time better
spent on other activities than
doing enough
research in order to form an opinion on each potential piece of legislation.
After
spending my first two years of law school
doing legal research, reading, and writing in the classroom, I jumped at the chance to get out of the classroom and actually work as an environmental advocate.
At the end, we
did have to
do a pitch with a PowerPoint presentation which is not my strongest suit — the PowerPoint — but it was really great because it gave me the opportunity to step out of
legal world where we
spend most of our time reading,
researching, dealing with other attorneys, it was a great way to think about things from a different perspective.
There are always exceptions that more experienced users will follow, but read any blog, book or brief on
legal research and the song is the same: Why
spend your time blindly looking for the leading case when an esteemed (and far more learned)
legal mind has already
done it for you?
That means that they have more time to
spend on other things such as advocacy issues that they may not be familiar with yet, and less time on the mundane
legal research tasks — we've
done a lot of those recently!
With all the time that technology has saved them, the future GC is able to sit down and
spend the rest of the day
doing legal research that is actually enjoyable, using software tools to find the most relevant cases and arguments.
[24] In response to Justice Watson's reference to Bob Cratchit's coal, I would point out that the disbursement claimed in these cases is for access to the
legal databases and is based upon the time
spent doing research for the particular client on the particular matter.
One doesn't normally expect a Blog quite as focused as the Huffington Post to
spend much time on the
legal publishing industry but Peter Schwartz's post on the Reinvention of Legal Research is worth a bit of atten
legal publishing industry but Peter Schwartz's post on the Reinvention of
Legal Research is worth a bit of atten
Legal Research is worth a bit of attention.
I envisioned lawyers
doing non-stop
legal research and writing, but in reality I
spend only 30 % of my time actually
doing legal work.
It worked for a while; she
spent three months in early 2012 training at high altitude in Kenya, running alongside the world's best, while also
doing legal research and writing briefs on her laptop, and e-mailing the work back to Chattanooga.
For an industry that
spends so much time looking at and studying precedent, the giants» singular focus on providing urgently needed (read: present)
legal content is a little puzzling, if only because they don't seem to be acknowledging the communal spaces for historical
research are disappearing.
While not exactly true,
legal marketers
do need to
spend time on - line (
researching clients and prospects, finding speaking events for lawyers, sponsorship and branding opportunities, etc.) and playing with crayons (creation of advertising, event invitations, newsletters, promotional material, presentation and proposal responses, etc.), there is actually a lot more they can
do for you.