Sentences with phrase «spent around the players»

But the most striking thing I took away from about the hour or two we spent around the players was the way, to a man, they spoke about the season ahead.

Not exact matches

Players have spent around $ 4.5 million on the game.

The following year and the max we spend on a single player is again, around # 10 million.

I'm going to repeat what I said earlier... this team actively pursued a policy to undermine the relationship between the fans and the best player on this team... for all intent and purposes this is a traitorous act... so instead of spending money, which all pundits and fans agreed was necessary in order to compete at the highest levels, this club was wasting time and money trying to turn fans against Sanchez long before the end of the season (the real concerted effort started around the time that Wenger benched him for the start of the Liverpool game)... for a team that pertains to be different, like a FAMILY, and constantly questions the tactics of it's opponents, to engage in such a treasonous act is deplorable

Had he left 2 seasons back, i wud hav been in support of dis, but since we have actually started spending (d board is finallly giving funds), around # 100 million in 2 seasons, also we haven't sold any of our top players in dat time, i m in favour of Wenger staying.

I would like to point out two things, the first is we need two players not one, AW is basically saying no DM And secondly he will spend around 10 mil and it will be a third choice CB WENGER OUT Too many muppets on here happy with 4th

«They needed a holding central midfielder and they've paid around # 30m for him, which is the type of money the Arsenal fans want to see being spent on the best players.

Spend a couple of days around Frost's coaches and players, and you'll be hard - pressed to find a speck of doubt that this place is about to become a college football giant again.

With fools like you around prepared to consider players like Iwobi virtual Gods already, no wonder our cancerous regime spend no real money on star players.

I find it hard to believe Arsenal would spent around # 50 million on a player, and agree to not use the player, or say anything until Monaco have a replacement.

SI's Pete Thamel said Hammann was the one who suggested to Brian Kelly that he spend more time around the players.

There is more money than ever floating around football, which means those clubs who spend big will attract and retain the top players.

Lacazette + Schneiderlin for 55 - 60 mil, Cech for free, young defender for 8 - 10 mil, minus various fees for the players leaving would leave us spending around 60 mil.

10/11 season spend was around # 20 million, # 11.25 was highest fee for player paid.

Moving on from it all for this season i fear for worst to come next season (just had a deja vu i say the same thing every season around this time) City already are talking spending 600 Million in the next two to three years on new players and you can bet Man - U will follow to try and close the gap, Liverpool can sell one player and buy an entire squad, Chelsea owner Abromovich has started to make noise's about next season so they will be spending, spuds will try to keep their existing players with one or two additions to strengthen and some salary rises to keep the elite, and Arsenal will go head to head with the likes of Burnley Everton Leicester for average players signature, and the board will make sure even if they replace AW they will replace him with AW No2 who will do what the board decides on who and how much to spend

This past summer, Manchester City spent around # 120 million on three players: Raheem Sterling, Nicolas Otamendi and Kevin De Bruyne.

Despite the fact Manchester United have spent around # 215m on new players in the past 18 months, Louis van Gaal is going to be given a further budget to take the spending before the start of next season to a whopping # 350m, reports the Times, Manchester Eveing News and the Guardian.

Gwin its simple his bosses are not pleased with him this season and if he fails next season his sacked, other clubs are not like arsenal you don't get time on top and yes they will spend probably around 300M, City needs to change more players then Arsenal in the near future and as we all know new players need to settle and some fail, that's why they are trying to steal EPL players who already conditioned, if they fail to attract the likes of Sanchez and some spud players he could have problems next season,

Mourinho has been handed around # 75m to spend so far, and further funds could come in the way of player sales, with a number of first - teamers» futures in doubt at the moment.

The times Liverpool, Tottenham, Manchester United and Co. have gone on spending sprees, brought in players that make us green with jealousy as they're players who are Football Manager superstars, have Youtube compilations worthy of shock and awe and possess great stats in the less competitive leagues around Europe, only to fade into the long list of players who never made it in the Premier league.

Realistically we are not going to spend this sort of money and we do not want to sell any of our top players so I think we have to be looking at a striker to complement giroud around the # 30 m mark with a wage or around # 100k pw.

I have always had a healthy respect for what Wenger has done for us over the years but this run of results is too much by a long chalk and its time that his competancy and the boards ambition was called into question by any of the fan groups strong enough to make a difference, theres around 200 million comming into the club next season with the new BT sports deal and I am almost certain that this wont be spent on the players we really need nor will it be used to lower season ticket prices, so where will this money go?

If you read the reports then the common thing about them was that AFC had around # 100 million to spend and up to from player sales, some media said # 200 million while others said around # 250 million.

Manchester United could look to bring in two superb attacking midfield players for around # 122m as Louis van Gaal seeks to keep on spending big at Old Trafford.

Writing in his column for the Daily Mail, the former Reds defender feels the club have done well to get back into contention for a top four spot, despite spending around # 150m on a host of new players in the summer.

The current situation in the Premier League and in some clubs around Europe must be hurting Arsene Wenger, because whereas Arsenal used to have to deal with just a few really big spending clubs swiping the best players, including our own top talent like van Persie, Fabregas and all, the Frenchman is now seeing huge transfer fees being splashed around by every man and his dog.

Central midfield remains something of a problem position for the Red Devils following the retirement of the legendary Paul Scholes, and van Gaal is still keen to bring in another new player in that part of the pitch despite already spending around # 30m on bringing in Ander Herrera from Athletic Bilbao.

200m / 40m that's 5 players so if you go ahead and buy 3 for around 40m that's 120 you still have 80m pounds to spend!!

Chinese clubs are spending heavily on taking some of the best players and biggest names from around the world to the CSL, but whether it adds to the league's strength and builds it's quality and infrastructure sufficiently to make it the leading competition in the world remains to be seen.

Prior to this deal we had around 80 million to spend on transfers AND we're running in the black so why was this m9ney not put towards buying players that could compete for trophies?

or he is out the door or going upstairs to the boardroom either way he has to deliver something big this season, or the boooos around the emirates will be deafening all season long and he wont be able to go near any train stations at all lol espehcially if he do nt spend any decent monies on top class players even if he is getting ripped off buying higuain its something better than nothing maybe.

Honestly if Wenger can use the fact that a clear out (at least 5 players) are on the move to his advantage with wages coming off, getting 20 - 25m from transfers with the condition that he is given around 90 - 100m to spend we can do something interesting.

Look at the guys around — are they all fools to buy players; spending 100 million on a player is may be foolish but not spending anything is nuts too.

If reports in media about # 100 mil was true and extra from player sales then the math suggests we need to sell a couple / few more players before we can go for Lemar and Seri after spending an upfront fee of around # 45 mil for Lacazette.

What dumbfounds me is the amount of conspiracy theories that fly around on here regarding the fans power over Wenger and his transfers... Do people on here actually believe the financially prudent Wenger would spend 17million on a player, with the sole intention of quietening the fans??

When a club spends 42 million on a player as good as Ózil, you need to build your team around that player!

Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing is going to be around 220 million or less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal worth around 130 million (wether or not it was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation

Pretty much the whole time he has been an Arsenal player we have had to worry about Alexis suffering an injury or burnout as he spends every summer playing and every international break flying around the globe, with Chile playing him even if he is carrying some sort of knock.

The fact is you are more than happy to spend massive amounts of payroll on keeping players around who will not give you a full season of performance.

now we are putting all our eggs in the miki basket by signing auba hoping to recreate the dortmund connnection, Auba a player better than laca but so similar it makes no sense spending that amount of money especially with all the cracks in the team, but hey lets do that and get rid of giroud our only option B upfront to accomodate miki a player who is 29 and at the lowest point of his career, building a team around him shows me that sad state we our in, we take what we are given and try to make the best of the situation and that's all of us from the board to the manager to the players all the way down to the fans.

And those are three of the biggest and most successful clubs around with some serious spending power to boot, so will Arsenal be able to fend off their interest in one of our best players?

If a player spends 45 days in the NBA, he could make around $ 204,000.

While our big Premier League rivals and most other clubs around have spent more and more money on players we have not jumped on the transfer bandwagon and Wenger has often spoke about why he thinks that the ever increasing spending is wrong and perhaps even unsustainable.

There are still tumbleweeds blowing around the Emirates stadium wait in vain for Arsene Wenger to use the club's mountain of cash and bring in a player or two to help us achieve the very difficult task of competing with our big spending rivals for the Premier League title.

im lost for words, spend 50 mil on a player who looked dangerous and keep taking him off around the 65 th min,, now we need a goal

They spend spells around not - so - good players and with not - so - good coaches yet are expected to come back better than they left doesn't make sense.

Sources told Yahoo Sports this week that there are potential ways around the limit on spending for under - 25 players like Shohei Otani.

Instead of buying multiple players for around 16mil we spent more per player and got 3 1st team players, this actually felt more like Wenger signings than Welbroke.

I agree with you that AW has done some astounding things for the club, but he has also made some reall balls ups and week in week out it seems he is not able to offer up a tactical plan B or utilise key players in key positions against the relevant sides we play, (not starting with Rosicky and Walcott on Saturday was one such instance) I realise that no team wins all their games and I know that we have been under the cosh for quiet a few years now, but what annoys me more than anything else is the lack of Visible ambition, we spent three weeks messing around with Beliek and only just managed to get Paulista who was an uncertainty due to a work visa.

Smart and looking great for a realistic better tomorow for us... This must happen at thius window as we in desperate need and great price and investment; why go and spend 100M for a Lemaror whatever player we after, some swiss forward and other left back name going around for 35M each... We have enough left backs, we don't even pla Bellerin athis position and other side we have 2...