The nuclear
spent fuel produced during 14 years of operation at Rancho Seco was kept cool in a water pool on site and is now in protective dry storage.
The spent fuel produced by nuclear power plants will emit harmful radiation for hundreds of thousands — even millions — of years.
Not exact matches
But, while those are cultivated specifically to
produce fuel,
spent coffee grounds are waste,» Chuck added.
Our office has
spent the last eight years hosting the Climate Justice Project, a research and public engagement network that has
produced a large volume of work about how to transition off fossil
fuels in a just and equitable manner — an alliance that brings together a wide range of NGOs and academics.
The fact that it takes only 8.8 pounds of plutonium to
produce an atomic bomb in the one - kiloton range makes
spent fuel rods an alluring target for sophisticated revolutionary groups.
Straus and a local mechanic
spent eight years developing an environmentally - friendly alternative to diesel -
fueled trucks: The feed truck's motor is charged from electrical power generated from methane gas
produced by the cows» own manure.
Heath said nuclear power
produces spent fuel rods which are radioactive and require constant maintenance.
Ironically Cuomo's attempt to hype and spin a record of fiscal restraint into much more — as reflected in his boast of
producing a non-existent $ 2 billion «surplus» — is actually
fueling calls for higher
spending than he wants to tolerate.
But in the post-Rio world, the environmental risk of
spent nuclear
fuel must be weighed against the potential environmental harm of the CO2
produced by burning fossil
fuels.
The authors see this as a stopgap step while an extensive research program investigates the potential for recycling
spent fuel to
produce new supplies.
An Outdated Strategy Early nuclear engineers expected that the plutonium in the
spent fuel of thermal reactors would be removed and then used in fast - neutron reactors, called fast breeders because they were designed to
produce more plutonium than they consume.
While several have
fuel cell prototype vehicles on the road — Toyota and Honda are even leasing them to the public in Japan and California — they are
spending upwards of $ 1 million to
produce each one due to the advanced technology involved and low production runs.
It also
produces large volumes of
spent nuclear
fuel that must be disposed of in a safe fashion.
Its five reactors, which used to
produce plutonium for bombs, have now been closed down, but Mayak still reprocesses
spent fuel from civilian reactors.
Iran agreed to ship
spent nuclear
fuel out of the country and promised not to
produce weapons - grade plutonium.
The Annual
Fuel UtilizationEfficiency rating tells you how much heat a furnace
produces compared to the energy it uses to
produce it.If an older furnace operates at 50 % AFUE, 50 cents of every dollar
spent is, well, going up in smoke.
I
spent some serious effort calculating just how many of the new NRC reactors we'd need to
produce to effectively move away from fossil
fuels.
After a thousand years or so, those have mostly decayed away and the
spent fuel is less biologically hazardous than the uranium ore used to
produce it.
Our nation's world - class refineries are also committed to the environment and
spent more than $ 160 billion between 1990 and 2015 on
producing cleaner - burning
fuels.
After all, the critics say, lower - income households
spend a higher percentage of their budgets on energy than rich ones do, and the price of energy
produced from carbon - intensive
fuels is likely to rise.
Choose to
spend your money with businesses and industries that are
fuel efficient and investing in renewable energy and LEED certified buildings,
producing products sustainably and reducing use of packaging.
They promote
spending $ 22 billion just in federal money during FY - 2014 on climate change studies; costly solar projects of every description; wind turbines that blight scenic vistas and slaughter millions of birds and bats annually, while wind energy developers are exempted from endangered species and other environmental laws that apply to all other industries; and ethanol programs that require millions of acres of farmland and vast quantities of water, fertilizer, pesticides and fossil
fuel energy to
produce a gasoline additive that reduces mileage, harms engines, drives up food prices... and increases CO2 emissions.
Taking action to
produce cleaner operations and cleaner products takes money — and industry is
spending it to invent substitute and less carbon - intensive
fuels, by supporting technologies such as wind, solar, biofuels, geothermal and others, and by improving efficiency and pursuing technologies such as carbon capture and storage and advanced technology vehicles.
In the United States, some 60,000 tons of nuclear waste have already been
produced, and existing reactors add some 2,000 metric tons of
spent fuel annually.
An amendment to a major military
spending bill before the House would rescind a 2007 federal law barring the Defense Department from using alternative
fuels, like synthetic oil made from coal, that
produce more climate - altering pollution than conventional
fuels.
It is telling that while there are thousands of articles, studies, books and movies about the relatively miniscule quantities of well - managed
spent fuel that comes out of nuclear plants, there is to date only one estimate of how much solar waste the world is on track to
produce, and it was calculated for the first time by an 18 - year - old nuclear engineering student from UC Berkeley and (proudly) published yesterday by Environmental Progress.
Once the relatively clean - running nuclear plant is online, it
produces radioactive waste in the form of
spent fuel rods.
In 1991, the Western
Fuels Association
spent $ 250,000 to
produce a propaganda video which was shown extensively in the George Bush White House as well as in the capitals of OPEC.
Canada Post (CP) has a very large fleet of vehicles, most of which
spend most weekdays on the road, stopping and starting, idling... This is expensive in
fuel costs, and it
produces a lot of
It's going to cost the UK roughly the same amount of money to
produce a «low carbon economy» over the next eight years as the entire world
spends in a year on «subsidising fossil
fuels» in a year.