Treated as gospel by governments around the world, it is the reason billions are being
spent on carbon dioxide emissions reduction.
Not exact matches
«My perspective is that it is not settled science,» he told the Senate
spending panel, arguing that the jury is still out
on whether
carbon dioxide emissions from human activities are driving global warming.
Mr. Gore, the 2000 Democratic presidential nominee and co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for his work
on climate change, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the new
spending Mr. Obama is proposing will begin to quickly reduce
emissions of
carbon dioxide and other pollutants blamed for global warming.
Essentially, China and India, the emerging giants in the global greenhouse, are saying that any extra costs for them to divert from established trajectories for
carbon dioxide emissions as they pursue prosperity must be covered by the established industrial powers, which still have many times greater
emissions on a per - capita basis and
spent a century freely adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere in building their wealth.
Eric Pooley, the deputy editor of Bloomberg Businessweek,
spent long stretches of the last three years immersed with a variety of combatants in the intensifying battle over legislation aimed at putting a price
on carbon dioxide emissions.
The allocated resources are
spent on subsidizing costly technologies — for example, deep underground sequestration of
carbon dioxide produced in power stations — that reduce
emissions of
carbon dioxide, or placing a tax
on activities that produce
carbon emissions.
Choice 1: How much money do we want to
spend today
on reducing
carbon dioxide emission without having a reasonable idea of: a) how much climate will change under business as usual, b) what the impacts of those changes will be, c) the cost of those impacts, d) how much it will cost to significantly change the future, e) whether that cost will exceed the benefits of reducing climate change, f) whether we can trust the scientists charged with developing answers to these questions, who have abandoned the ethic of telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but, with all the doubts, caveats, ifs, ands and buts; and who instead seek lots of publicity by telling scary stories, making simplified dramatic statements and making little mention of their doubts, g) whether other countries will negate our efforts, h) the meaning of the word hubris, when we think we are wise enough to predict what society will need a half - century or more in the future?
Trillions of dollars are being proposed to be
spent on boondoggle schemes which will not significantly lower
carbon dioxide emissions.
The report's tab for government
spending on fossil fuels includes $ 2.3 billion to promote research and development of technology to capture and store the
carbon dioxide emissions that are released when coal is burned.