Sentences with phrase «spoken about religious»

Only 40 percent of respondents stated that clergy had spoken about religious liberty.

I hardly think the U.S. can speak about religious intolerance.

I am speaking about religious faith of course.

It began in front of the White House, in the third paragraph he delivered on our shores, speaking about religious freedom: «That freedom remains one of America's most precious possessions.

According to the Shi`as, they have had virtues and attributes which have been superior to those of anyone in their time; they were endowed with greatness and the ability to perform miracles; they were infallible and innocent; each one was introduced by the previous Imam as his immediate successor; the Prophet referred to them by name and designated them by number; they gave the best and clearest statements concerning the origin of man and the Day of Resurrection; and after the Prophet they were the best authority to speak about religious affairs and conduct in the affairs of this world.

Not exact matches

There has been a «resurgence,» so to speak, of media caring about religious subplots and overtones.

I shall not speak about biblical terminologies and do not need to be reminded about manuscripted religious flaws.

You are free to speak out about you religious beliefs or lack thereof, but this is why I don't talk about mine.

So you're too stupid to give some examples on a belief blog that focuses on religion and people who are religious and that they speak about god to give me alternatives to different terms?

They talk about an attack on religious teachings while speaking at an NRA event about how abortion is murdering unborn children while at the same time wanting to go to war and bomb thousands of innocent men, women, children, as well as innocent pregnant women with unborn babies.

Both her surgeon and her oncologist were deeply religious Christians and compassionate human beings who spoke openly and honestly about Carol's condition and prognosis....

It seems then, that the only place in the Bible which speaks about the «Holy Writings,» Paul is writing somewhat about the Jewish religious view of the Law, a view in which he was taught and trained (as was Timothy), but which is proved to be untrue in light of the revelation in Jesus Christ.

But there is a reason to remain vigilant about religious liberty, including something as simple as speaking out about the denial of such a right.

She speaks and writes about a wide range of topics — from the pro-life movement, to women in the church, to movies and pop culture, to religious philosophy and faith.

Since his release, he has spoken out about conditions in prisons, and the torture religious prisoners endured.

From the pulpit of a church, speaking to a live audience about religious diversity, Obama sarcastically belittled America's Judeo - Christian heritage and degraded its adherents with trite remarks typical of any atheistic antagonist, saying things like: «Whatever we were, we are no longer a Christian nation,» «The Sermon on the Mount is a passage that is so radical that our own defense department wouldn't survive its application» and «To base our policy making upon such commitments as moral absolutes would be a dangerous thing.»

oh, so like pretty much all religious people you have the audacity and hubris to speak disparagingly about what other people * think * their religion is supposed to be about, implying that, apparently, you and only you have all the real answers.

Christians who wish to speak «the language of the people» — and thus talk a lot about what makes up «the Christian lifestyle» — often assume that they can return to their own familiar «religious» language of grace and faith, sin and redemption, justice and mercy, even act and consequence, whenever they want.

I had a chance to speak with Schwartz about the political and religious implications of his book.

I believe Jesus is real and that He spoke very harshly to the religious fanatics and people who thought they know all about God and how He judges a man.

And about the thief who comes to steal, kill and destroy... we do realize that is speaking of the false religious leaders of the day and not satan, right?

In Europe, a sharp dividing line has been drawn between religious belief and religious practice, so that Christians are frequently reminded that they can believe whatever they like and do what they like inside their churches — they simply can not speak about or act on those beliefs in public.

Most religious people I have talked to, speak about being «saved by the grace of God» (or some sort of similar terminology).

It is indeed legitimate to speak of the person of God within the religious relation and in its language; but in so doing we are making no essential statement about the Absolute which reduces it to the personal.

Indeed, some of them are sensitive to the changes taking place in religious thinking, to the uncertainty about many traditional beliefs, and to the difficulty of speaking of God so as to be understood.

He spoke of the prestige of science in our culture and the corresponding lack of respect for religion («If it's a science programme it's a documentary, if the subject's politics there's a debate, but a religious programme, unless it's hymns for granny, will have people talking about their feelings»).

Religion or religious people are unfairly picked out as the cause of bullying when I believe people who are truely faithful to their religion speak only about their belief which so often is thought of as bullying.

When Jesus spoke about praying quietly, He was referencing the hypocrisy of the religious leaders, and those who did not practice what the preached.

And the worst kind of pride: religious pride (one of Screwtape's letters speaks quite eloquently about this).

In spite of speaking openly about his Christian faith and conversion experience, his religious beliefs were often distorted for political purposes.

He has spoken and written often about protecting liberty, religious and otherwise.

Like the general congregations, the synod sessions are always closed to the public and the media for practical reasons: Bishops speak openly about political and religious persecution in parts of the world, for example.

Certainly, the «lusts of the flesh» of which you speak do include a form of religious superiority and haughtiness that do no favor to those looked down upon (believe it or not, it is not all about sex).

However, because there is no clergy in Islam everyone with religious authority can speak about the Faith.

While the religious groups seem to be speaking more stridently in their own languages, there is a realization that the grant of authority to the churches to speak definitively about the «things of God» has largely been wit · hdrawn.

The lesser kinds of reverence have been noted only in order that we may be quite clear that even in Catholic circles the term worship is applied normally to God and none other, although it is important that we understand that by association with God and His presence and work, creatures are seen in the Christian tradition as worthy of something even more remarkable than the respect for personality of which democracy has spoken — they are worthy of reverence which is religious in quality, reverence about which there is a mystery, just as in human personality itself there is a deep mystery by reason of its being grounded in the mystery of God.

People being free to speak about, express, and practice their religious beliefs?

At first glance, one might tend to classify the religious - affections scholars into Lindbeck's second category, in which he places the existentialists who speak about a universal «depth - dimension» uncovered in certain experiences of «authenticity.»

So if there is something unsurpassable about him for believers, it is ultimately derived from the mystery that he sacramentally mediates - Whenever a religion speaks of the «unsurpassability» of its central revelatory event, personality, or doctrine, religious wisdom exhorts us to acknowledge that only the unfathomable mystery to which these realities point is indeed unsurpassable.

But instead of imposing an alternative religious system of heroics on these poor, he spoke to them about a reign of God wherein one is not required to conform to any cultural or religious heroics as a condition of belonging to the divine fellowship.

Sporting large yellow stickers that read «Background Checks Save Lives,» a number of religious leaders spoke about the need for stricter gun laws.

My # 1 criticism with religious people, is thus: Those of us who reject religion in favor of science tend to speak about our beliefs in the way the universe works with an assumed sense of «we think.»

Only such a religious vision makes possible Whitehead's language about God, and quite naturally Whitehead's fullest speech about God is dipolar, in that it simultaneously speaks about God and the World or the World and God.

How about those of us who have not been brainwashed with religious lies, fairy tales and codswallop since childhood speaking out against Evangelicals!

In religious talk we rightly speak about our moving toward «the image of God» who is such Love - in - act.

«Spoke [with] Iraq PM @HaiderAlAbadi about our Admin's commitment to PROTECT persecuted Christians & religious minorities in Iraq & the Middle East.

Jeff: This is what causes division as we go about doing even good things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the peoples became great, so to is it now with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..

They didn't draw on the Gospels, thinking about how stories like the Good Samaritan might speak to religious diversity.

Christians living in better circumstances, however, need to take up the cause of their suffering brethren: they need to educate themselves about what is happening, spread the news, ask their own religious leaders to speak out, support reputable organizations that are working for religious freedom, and appeal to their political leaders to do far more in their contacts with key diplomats and oppressive governments.

The religious are relentless in their pursuit to force everyone to conform to their way of thinking that I personally think it's about time Atheists at least got organized to the point of offering a place to share ideas... but that doesn't translate into having conventions or holding Atheist sermons so to speak.