Sentences with phrase «spoken language is used»

Mr. Caron was also granted an interpreter based on section 14 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 (Charter), which states that a person has a right to an interpreter in proceedings in which they do not understand or speak the language being used.

Not exact matches

Using an enthusiastic tone, uncrossing your arms, maintaining eye contact, and leaning towards the person who's speaking are all forms of positive body language that high - EQ people use to draw others in.

He was very careful in the language he used when he spoke.

Everyone who's used VR thus far is speaking a similar language.

I don't mean this literally: The «from» line might still be your company's name, but the content should feel as if it comes from a human being, speaking in the first person (using «I» or «we» and addressing the recipient as «you»), with natural - sounding language.

Even if you don't speak the language fluently, it's important to pick up key words that you'll use over and over again.

they come into this country and the one thing they could do is at least learn how to use a language that is spoken in the country they move to that gives them freedom to do whatever THEY want to do!!

She was eventually released, when an intern realized she was using an archaic dialect of the language his parents, or grandparents spoke.

For the over-all result of the great reaction has been a sophistication of the true simplicity of the gospel, the use of a jargon which the common man (and the intelligent one, too, often enough) can not understand, and a tendency to assume that the biblical and creedal language as it stands need only be spoken, and enough then has been done to state and communicate the point of the Christian proclamation.

The variety of voices is heightened by the different dialogue styles Paton uses: the lyric, almost biblical way he renders the Zulu dialect; the cliché - ridden language of the commercially oriented, English - speaking community; the chanting rhythms and repetition of the native «chorus»; the clear, logical, terse style of the educated black priest who helps Kumalo find Absalom; the cynical, humorous tone of chapter 23, a satire on justice.

He now speaks either through using a computer with a mechanised voice, or in language that Emma is able to understand.

Nor does it mean that, in preaching the gospel in conscious recognition of the metaphorical nature of the language we use, we are speaking in what might be styled a «Pickwickian» manner.

we are direct descendants of the Egyptians living at the times of the pharaohs and the greeks that have come afterwards... we still use the ancient demotic language (spoken ancient Egyptian) in our liturgies and prayers.

It should be noted that throughout this book we have assiduously pursued the use of gender - free language in speaking of God.

One possibility is that we are simply using this current language to speak of the importance of the church's developing its doctrine of nature more fully and in ways appropriate to our new understanding of the relation between human beings and the natural world.

It is Christ himself who provides warrant for the use of Greek philosophical language to speak about who God is.

The Christian is being challenged to show that when he uses religious language, and in particular, when he uses the word «God», he is speaking in a meaningful way, and is not simply repeating an archaic form of words which belonged to the old world, and which is no more relevant to the new world than goblins and fairies.

To speak, then, of the «God - hypothesis» may be to use a misleading kind of language, to put up the wrong frames of reference and to suggest that we look for God - answers to questions where such answers would be out of place.

The answer is, God uses a 4 dimensional language to speak to 4 dimensional creatures.

The tasks of infancy are first to learn the differentiation of objects; second to master spoken language; and third, to be able to use that language for a classified and enlarged enjoyment of objects (see, AE 31).

Jesus is «speaking their language» so to speak, not using a contemporary swear word or call them idiots, evil or otherwise.

If not, we're speaking different languages when we use those words.

Many since Kant have doubted whether God, who gave us language, actually uses language to communicate with uswhether, that is, God's «speaking» to people is a cognitive event for them as my speaking to you would be, or whether this «speaking» is a metaphor for some non-cognitive way in which we are made aware of his presence.

Those who use language to express themselves — rather than to communicate something of value to others — are not concerned with either the situation in which they speak or the persons to whom they speak.

Bultmann himself is alive to this consequence, for he says at one point: «Anyone who asserts that to speak of an act of God at all is to use mythological language is bound to regard the idea of an act of God in Christ as a myth.

The project has two subjects, Koko and Michael, who have learned to use American Sign Language (Ameslan), to understand spoken English, and to read printed words.10 Koko's instruction, begun in 1973, is the longest ongoing language study of an ape, and the only one with continuous instruction by the same teacher.

Or, rather, would it be by using the pronunciation and spelling that are common in our language, while speaking well of its Owner and conducting ourselves as his worshipers in a manner that honors him?

Is it possible that the exclusionary language Jesus uses, the rejection He speaks of, is about something other than eternal damnatioIs it possible that the exclusionary language Jesus uses, the rejection He speaks of, is about something other than eternal damnatiois about something other than eternal damnation?

Here's a question: Is it possible that the exclusionary language Jesus uses, the rejection He speaks of, is about something other than eternal damnatioIs it possible that the exclusionary language Jesus uses, the rejection He speaks of, is about something other than eternal damnatiois about something other than eternal damnation?

2) I was listening to Greg Boyd teach via podcast the other day, and he was speaking on the use of gender language in the first century.

If therefore the gospel is to be made intelligible, it must use a language such as men use when they speak of events with an ultimate existential and cosmic significance.

Were the pulpit to acquiesce and promise to speak according to these rules, it would have to forfeit its evocative use of words, its use of language to create new situations, its use of the parable and the myth.

There are a number of other places where the Bible speaks using «all of» language where it is quite clear it doesn't mean that literalistically.

The person who uses self - involving language to speak of his faith in God, however, is led to the speculative language of theology and metaphysics in order to talk about his way of looking on God and the world.

The other, more common use of cliché is, I think, just speaking the language of that subculture.

They began to modify the old scholastic system in the madrasas and sought to bring the some twenty - six different dialects of Turkish closer to the language as it is spoken in Istanbul, where it is used in its most refined and articulate form.

they all say same thing pretty much... got to remember we can not fully trust 100 percent all translations... which is why one needs to study properly by using Koine Greek (for NT) dictionaries and concordances... and Hebrew dictionaries for OT... when one realizes how the versions are trnalated they will see this... also... thuis is true of ANY piece of literature... have you ever studied and spoken another r language?

An Emergent definition of relevance, modulated by resistance, might run something like this; relevance means listening before speaking; relevance means interpreting the culture to itself by noting the ways in which certain cultural productions gesture toward a transcendent grace and beauty; relevance means being ready to give an account for the hope that we have and being in places where someone might actually ask; relevance means believing that we might learn something from those who are most unlike us; relevance means not so much translating the churches language to the culture as translating the culture's language back to the church; relevance means making theological sense of the depth that people discover in the oddest places of ordinary living and then using that experience to draw them to the source of that depth (Augustine seems to imply such a move in his reflections on beauty and transience in his Confessions).

The Church Speaks The Language of Love This is the sort of language we use to talk about marriage and complete sacrifice between lovers.

«Again, the corrupt and unsound form of speaking in the plural number to a single person, you to one, instead of thou, contrary to the pure, plain, and single language of truth, thou to one, and you to more than one, which had always been used by God to men, and men to God, as well as one to another, from the oldest record of time till corrupt men, for corrupt ends, in later and corrupt times, to flatter, fawn, and work upon the corrupt nature in men, brought in that false and senseless way of speaking you to one, which has since corrupted the modern languages, and hath greatly debased the spirits and depraved the manners of men; — this evil custom I had been as forward in as others, and this I was now called out of and required to cease from.

«If I am asked to use the language of factuality, then I would say, yes, m those terms, I have to speak of an empty tomb.

«You realize that he is using a kind of language that's so infused with religious symbols that one wonders how the church can speak, when its language is so taken over by the culture,» he said.

He says «The fact proves first of all, that not one of the scores of dialects spoken by India in the first century has been found fit to be raised to the dignity of a sacred language in which the message of the Gospel could be expressed with dignity and aptitude; it proves also that the Indian Christians were satisfied for the upkeep of their spiritual life with the use of a language which their esteemed migrants had made familiar to them.»

On the strictest biblical terms there must be something in common between the words we use to speak about God's being and about our being, otherwise it is impossible to see how language about God the Father, and God the Son can be meaningful at all.

At Acts 10:46, Luke used a variation of the same expressions found in 2:11 alongside «speaking in tongues,» so that prophesying in a foreign language is most probably meant again.46 Peter's companions from Joppa in a multilingual society would presumably have recognized other languages than their own.

Rupert can be asked whether The Concept of Nature can be used to provide a philosophic background for his notion of «morphic resonance,» and I want to see whether the concept of a bare sensory awareness in a passage of nature couched in terms of durations can sufficiently produce boundaries so as to yield breath groups in spoken speech and semantic reiterations in paragraphs and language; and Chris wants to know whether Whitehead's starting point can be used, though not in Whitehead's manner, to develop a realistic conception of space and time.

I'm an Irishman living in America speaking whatever language and using the cultural values of my audience (College students) Thanks for this!

Semetic is a term that was used to describe a language group and those that spoke it.

When, in speaking of God, we use language which derives from human experience, it is not univocal.

It may be, then, that as a religious person speaks, he uses language that reflects the meaning to be found in his own life style.