Sentences with phrase «spoken to anyone about»

In reading the reason why you had gotten one I thought «I hadn't spoken to anyone about hating the doorbell and not wanting answering it», and for the exact reasons you listed.

In the past 3 years, I have not spoken to anyone about this student loan.

I hadn't spoken to anyone about what was happening.

I haven't really spoke to anyone about becoming vegan and so invited my mother and grandmother over for dinner and they could not believe that this dish was meatless.

Spokesman Brian Smith, said Davis would not speak to anyone about it until tomorrow.

Peter Taubkin and a SUNY Poly spokesperson did not respond to a request to speak to anyone about the table.

I didn't speak to anyone about it, just a conversation with my innerself.

We have many satisfied Vanillabelle Ragdoll Kitten owners who would be happy to speak to anyone about the cleanliness of our cattery, the quality of our breeding program, and the extremely loving temperaments and robust health of our stunning Ragdoll cats & kittens.

When speaking to anyone about the accident, such as police, paramedics, the at - fault driver, never say anything that could be used against you.

You should not speak to anyone about the accident or the circumstances that led to it before you have spoken to a lawyer.

If you have been arrested or charged with murder, it is imperative that you seek experienced legal representation before speaking to anyone about the incident or event that triggered your arrest.

In England and Wales, jurors are forbidden to speak to anyone about the trial or their deliberations, even after the trial is finished.

I'm also willing to speak to anyone about my experience with HomeVestors (phone number in signature).

Not exact matches

Watch House of Cards (speaking of creeps...) or any old episode of Behind the Music, and the story about power you'll see is simple: a nice, ambitious person, once they can do whatever they want, is quickly transformed into a monster of appetite, running over anyone necessary to satisfy their newly created desires.

«Most execs insist they can only speak about their own businesses — they don't want to step on anyone else's toes.»

A responsible United States Congress would investigate these matters, and it speaks volumes about how invested the current Republican majority is in turning a blind eye to such a broad range of Trumpian misconduct that it doesn't even occur to anyone to wonder whether investigations will happen.

While I'm sympathetic to anyone who dislikes the current tax rates, and I think it is unfortunate that dividends are taxed at all since they are already taxed 35 % or so at the corporate level, but realistically speaking, the current 15 % tax structure (for most of us) is about as good as we can ask for.

He says, «Nobody learned anything by hearing themselves talk, or speak,» and he goes on to say, «The ability to lock in and listen is a skill that has served me well in life,» says Branson, «Although, it seems to be a dying art, I believe that listening is one of the most important skills for any teacher, parent, leader, entrepreneur, or just about anyone who has a pulse.»

This is a tricky one, because social media has taught us all to speak our minds at all times, about all things, to anyone who happens to be in earshot.

What a nasty, ugly, insulting way to speak to ANYONE or about aANYONE or about anyoneanyone.

It is my firm belief that anyone who truly lives what they believe will have no need to tell others about their faith, because their faith will speak for them.

Liberals indulge in periodic public rhetorical displays of «So - to - Speak» support for the Constitution, and they like well - told history or biography about the Founders as well as anyone, but they aren't as interested in treating them as a guide.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

I said nothing about any other faiths... that is something your pea brain made up because you can't see past your fucking nose far enough to let anyone else speak for themselves.

Anyone who has spoken up in a board room knows it can be intimidating to put your ideas out there and expose them to criticism, especially when you're really excited about them.

Jesus also says that anyone who speaks against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but this view about Israel's rejection of Jesus seems to say the opposite, that Jewish people who rejected Jesus by speaking against Him would not be forgiven.

I just watched the movie «September Dawn» where on 9 - 11 many Americans lost their lives to this cult and I spoke with my Son about this movie where they believe by killing gentiles (anyone not a mormon) that they are saving us, and we can go to the planet kolob and be a god.

It certainly is good to have finally found out that Christianity is nothing more than just tradition, ritual and culture and that all the things which the Bible says about God and prayer are not true — God does not speak to or lead or guide or direct anyone or put thoughts in anyone's mind or show them signs or speak to their heart or mind or tells them what to do or calls people or chooses people or has a plan for people's lives whether they are in an altered state of consciousness / transcendent state or whether they are in an unaltered cognitive state.

We never handled snakes, in fact we denounced the practice as «tempting God» and even went so far as to say that those who participated were unsaved (but then we said that about Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans, anyone who didn't speak in tongues, etc).

Speaking of «truth [being] made manifest in many different ways, including in creation itself» (me), and contrary to fishon's idea that a world of facts is «sterile», anyone know anything about quantum physics?

According to the Shi`as, they have had virtues and attributes which have been superior to those of anyone in their time; they were endowed with greatness and the ability to perform miracles; they were infallible and innocent; each one was introduced by the previous Imam as his immediate successor; the Prophet referred to them by name and designated them by number; they gave the best and clearest statements concerning the origin of man and the Day of Resurrection; and after the Prophet they were the best authority to speak about religious affairs and conduct in the affairs of this world.

The consequence of misinterpretation of Gods only truth is spoken about by Jesus in Matthew 18 v 6 to 7 But if anyone causes one of these little ones who trust in me to lose faith, it would be better for that person to be thrown in the sea with a large mill stone tied around his neck.

Anyone can get married, sign a contract, speak to a hospital about who they want to visit them and who gets their stuff when they die.

There we go again, shut up this hypocritical rightwingers.Only at election time do rear their ugly heads up to be seen and heard.It's time to unleash the CRACKKIN, the monster that the IRS people use on unruly religious groups, exemption is like a death sentence to these groups.Most of these religious leaders are wolves in sheeps clothing, selling their political poison to anyone in their flocks.They push the envelope on the seperation of church and state issue, seeing how far they can go.Pastors and ministers would never speak politics like this years ago, that was taaboo.Now people like Robertson, Graham, and the rest, flaunt their ideaology both religious and political at every event.They don't care about the legal consequences, they have LAWYERS, perishioners pay for that.

If that is all anyone reads to learn about Mormonism, then it speaks volumes of the state of our educational system.

I experienced this sort of rhetoric as an Episcopalian, and I can report that it's consistently used by authoritarian liberals to silence anyone who dares to speak about the truth.

For example, when I lived in Dallas, there were several famous churches in town, and though I often heard people speak about the church, I can not remember anyone ever referring to the church by its name.

I'm speaking about the people that seem to think that a certain (name your disaster here...) happened, «because» God is (fill in your opinion of what God is mad at here...) «He's mad at the gays, he's mad at the non-believers (anyone other than a «true Christian»), etc...

We spoke to Christine about Full Harvest's role in reducing food waste and how anyone at the foodservice level can do their part from the comfort of their own kitchens.

Speaking of loyalty in professional football, many people have different opinions about it but I am not here to lecture anyone on loyalty or disloyalty... I am pretty sure that many of us will agree that Arsene Wenger is one of the most loyal managers in the world as he is loyal to a fault, in fact, many believe that his loyalty has caused more harm than good to the club....

According to some legal experts I've spoken with, the idea of honest talk about sports and other topics in a barbershop is not protectable — anyone can make a series based on that idea.

«I want to compliment the program, given everything going on in the school and portrayed in the media,» he wrote, adding that he would speak highly of the Mighty Ducks and their staff to anyone who asked about scheduling the team in the future.

That speaks volumes on you, not about anyone able to engage on a wider topic.

One thing i realized is that when the truth is spoken about some arsenal players people become angry and call others negative.However it is wrong to insult others and call a person like Mourinho classless because he has more class than anyone who does that.

Manchester United manager Louis van Gaal has spoken of his joy at the prospect of the club managing to finish in third place in the Premier League this season — but is it really something anyone should be happy about?

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Anyone who listened to Varane speak about his future and his willingness to fight at a big club, knows that boy ain't going nowhere.

«Speaking about my work and connecting my work to the garbage news is to say the worst thing that anyone can do to myself.

He may well speak out about wanting to go this Summer, but will anyone take him on?

And speaking as someone who's just moved into the next phase (separated five months but only just filed yesterday), even if there's no fighting going on, even if it's the most amicable and collaborative divorce anyone you know has ever seen... if you didn't want to get one and would give anything if the other person had just been able to take those first steps to getting on the right path again and walk it together, then there's nothing about it that's going to feel «easy» no matter how you slice it.