Sentences with phrase «spoken to anyone as»

The Swedish star insists he has not spoken to anyone as he enters the final few months of his PSG contract

Not exact matches

Last year there was a string of serial rapes and we are speaking with some of the local advocacy groups and developing a plan to keep the space open and staffed Friday and Saturday nights until an hour after the bars close so that if there is anyone feeling uncomfortable or threatened by a situation can come and use the space as a safe haven and have the option of being walked home at the end of the evening.

While I'm sympathetic to anyone who dislikes the current tax rates, and I think it is unfortunate that dividends are taxed at all since they are already taxed 35 % or so at the corporate level, but realistically speaking, the current 15 % tax structure (for most of us) is about as good as we can ask for.

I have fortunately gotten offers to work at a startup and in several different contexts similar to my previous position — and these are things I would potentially enjoy, yes, but to waste the potential equity that «personal brand», dirty as it may sound, creates for me (or anyone else) to leverage into client work that pays well and speaking gigs that open up other opportunities — would be a true «lighting on fire» of that which I had done to build that before quitting.

There is no more evidence that any «LORD» spoke to them and «anointed» anyone as king than that he spoke to the Duke of Windsor to abdicate so that eventually Queen Elizabeth would be «anointed» as the British monarch.

He is not trying to offend anyone, he merely speaks to the religious in the same tone they speak to us, as in informed person trying to show the less informed why they should listen.

Today, with much of the discourse on drug addiction controlled by medical bureaucrats, it is common to speak of addiction as an «equal - opportunity disease» that can «strike anyone.»

Liberals indulge in periodic public rhetorical displays of «So - to - Speak» support for the Constitution, and they like well - told history or biography about the Founders as well as anyone, but they aren't as interested in treating them as a guide.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

Christianity itself has become a principality and holds thousands captive, Before anyone comments on me calling todays Christianity a principality, (a demonic stronghold) let me just make a request that those who do answer are those who live as the followers of the way did in biblical times, that is, meeting every day, considering nothing they owned as their own, laying their lives down for the gospel (and not getting paid to do so) and having signs and wonders accompany them when they speak of the Lord.

In contrast Jesus took away the power and riches motivation as he spoke against hierarchical leadership withing the community he is building, against giving titles to anyone, and against using the place were people gather together for monetary gain.

The words from Psalm 118 «Suscipe me, Domine» (receive me, Lord) are sung by those making profession as a monk or nun, and the teaching offered here on the nature of vows speaks to anyone who sees their human journey in terms of vocation.

I am an avid reader of the sciences and philosophy as well so I believe that with my educational and life's background I can speak intelligently on these subjects but certainly not exhaustively and stand ready to discuss evidence (s) for and against with anyone willing to dialog without rancor or name calling or nastiness.

He does not need me or anyone else to defend him or speak on his behalf, as you can see from the Scripture below.

There is also a practical benefit to Reno's ecumenism, in that anyone speaking of «Christian society» in this day and age invites being tarred with words like «theocracy» and «inquisition,» as if Christian society necessitated those forms.

He rang the changes on sin more eloquently than anyone of our time, but that dissection, set forth with particularly telling power in the first volume of his Gifford Lectures, was followed by a second volume in which his acknowledgment of the power of the gospel as grace made it possible for him to speak of «the agape of the Kingdom of God [as] a resource for the infinite development towards a more perfect brotherhood in history» (The Nature and Destiny of Man, II [Scribner's, 1943], p. 85)

Bultmann himself is alive to this consequence, for he says at one point: «Anyone who asserts that to speak of an act of God at all is to use mythological language is bound to regard the idea of an act of God in Christ as a myth.

I was speaking to myself as much as anyone.

Again, as I stated before, whether one prays intensely or does not pray intensely, God does not speak to or lead or guide or direct anyone or put thoughts in anyone's mind or show them signs or speak to their heart or mind or tells them what to do or calls people or chooses people or has a plan for people's lives.

We never handled snakes, in fact we denounced the practice as «tempting God» and even went so far as to say that those who participated were unsaved (but then we said that about Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans, anyone who didn't speak in tongues, etc).

But whatever anyone dares to boast of - I am speaking as a fool - I also dare to boast of that.

As for this article and anyone who speaks Christian, Jesus said of those who speak and act in such a way to be seen of men (and impress them) «they have their reward.»

«We speak on this subject very cautiously and diffidently,» he writes, «rather by way of discussion than coming to definite conclusions... We suppose that the goodness of God will restore the whole creation to unity in the end... If anyone thinks that matter will be utterly destroyed, it passes my comprehension how all these substances can live and exist without material bodies, since to live without material substance is the privilege of God alone... Another perhaps may say that in the consummation all matter will be so purified that it may be thought of as a kind of ethereal substance... But only God knows.»

«We have one right to expect from anyone who is «speaking» for God — to «hear» the message of «Christ Crucified» — the Lord placarded as dying for our sin and being raised for our justification — the saving truth that deals with our failure.

According to the Shi`as, they have had virtues and attributes which have been superior to those of anyone in their time; they were endowed with greatness and the ability to perform miracles; they were infallible and innocent; each one was introduced by the previous Imam as his immediate successor; the Prophet referred to them by name and designated them by number; they gave the best and clearest statements concerning the origin of man and the Day of Resurrection; and after the Prophet they were the best authority to speak about religious affairs and conduct in the affairs of this world.

One thing is indisputable and that is that Fr Peter Gumpel SJ who listened as a boy in church to the 1937 Encyclical Mit Brennender Sorge (With Burning Sorrow) is not exaggerating when he states that it was that Encyclical (Pacelli revised the first draft by the archbishop of Munich, Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber) which so infuriated Hitler that it caused him to refuse to see or speak to anyone for three days.

That can work both ways — anyone can just as easily make out that is what you were doing in the way you have spoken to me.

Buddah is dead cant speak from the grave so all this wisdom is lost and not able to do anything for anyone except as they can personally conform to these sayings

As for Rick Perry the man is not to be trusted nor anyone who says god spoke to him, better Idea would be to seek mental help from licensed professionals.

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

And lastly, as anyone who has taken Bible 1 - 01 knows, the function of a «prophet» is NOT to tell the future, but to speak «truth to power».

I would encourage anyone in this country to speak out if you feel as though your personal liberties are at risk, whether its intentional or not.

You said, «I don't wish to impose my life of being married as the bible states on anyone but don't ask for what is spoken against in the bible.»

As an outsider not privy to psychic, celestial conversations there is no way for anyone to know if it was God who spoke with those people, Moses, Joseph Smith, David Koresh etc ad nauseum or if it was mental illness.

I experienced this sort of rhetoric as an Episcopalian, and I can report that it's consistently used by authoritarian liberals to silence anyone who dares to speak about the truth.

I don't wish to impose my life of being married as the bible states on anyone but don't ask for what is spoken against in the bible.

Just because his name has resemblance to Muslim, and Islam - did anyone assume Bush had ties to idiot savants, when he spoke and acted as he did??

I can't speak for atheists or anyone else but myself but perhaps it's because so many Christians come off as smug, holier than thou types who shake their heads condescendingly in pity for us others who actually are crazy enough to think for ourselves.

As for me, I honestly don't think I have ever eaten a chicken wing in my life (anyone who knows me in real life that might remember better than me, feel free to speak up).

Speaking of loyalty in professional football, many people have different opinions about it but I am not here to lecture anyone on loyalty or disloyalty... I am pretty sure that many of us will agree that Arsene Wenger is one of the most loyal managers in the world as he is loyal to a fault, in fact, many believe that his loyalty has caused more harm than good to the club....

I apologize if i'm speaking for you in the wrong context Jonestown, but I think he was trying to point out that these «squad» players that people seem to want so badly may not be as stoked at the competition within our team as we would be... Sure there's arguments for a quality upgrade with a few players, but a few may have to leave before anyone comes in.

We were sitting two seats below Monaco fans sitting laughing and taking the piss, and no one seemed to think that that's wrong, I've been to away grounds to watch Arsenal sat in the home team stand and respectfully stay quiets if we score, as a punch in the mouth often offends, I'm amazed at our home games, so many people who don't even speak English and seem to treat the game as a Sunday afternoon tea party, where are the old Arsenal fans born and bred Arsenal, I'm all for a multi cultural look but let's not lose anyone in the race to become global.

«I spoke to Daniel at length and he's as down as I've seen anyone.

And speaking as someone who's just moved into the next phase (separated five months but only just filed yesterday), even if there's no fighting going on, even if it's the most amicable and collaborative divorce anyone you know has ever seen... if you didn't want to get one and would give anything if the other person had just been able to take those first steps to getting on the right path again and walk it together, then there's nothing about it that's going to feel «easy» no matter how you slice it.

As your case, sometimes their options doesn't cover your problem and you can't speak to anyone.

I hope that anyone with doubts about providing their child with this supplement will speak to a medical professional and make an informed decision rather than paying attention to inflammatory comments such as this.

It comes as new plans were revealed to strip benefits from anyone who can not speak English, with separate efforts to end the printing of welfare information in foreign languages.

«Our appeal is to anyone who may know his current whereabouts or can assist us in finding him — we do need to speak to him as a matter of urgency.»

But speaking to the Times, Mandelson said anyone who tried to take Labour back to the era before Blair's election as leader in 1994 would wreck the party's chances of a swift return to power.