Sentences with phrase «spoken to anyone so»

Not exact matches

Everything that could have been said has already been spoken in hundreds or even thousands of different iterations, so why should anyone listen to you?

Last year there was a string of serial rapes and we are speaking with some of the local advocacy groups and developing a plan to keep the space open and staffed Friday and Saturday nights until an hour after the bars close so that if there is anyone feeling uncomfortable or threatened by a situation can come and use the space as a safe haven and have the option of being walked home at the end of the evening.

Or, it could be that anyone with half a brain would realize you're going to be more successful if you speak idiomatic English, so they must just be clueless if they haven't gotten rid of their strong accent.

Every Ring device features a wide - angle lens and a built - in microphone and speaker, so you can see, hear and speak to anyone on your property from anywhere.

While I'm sympathetic to anyone who dislikes the current tax rates, and I think it is unfortunate that dividends are taxed at all since they are already taxed 35 % or so at the corporate level, but realistically speaking, the current 15 % tax structure (for most of us) is about as good as we can ask for.

There is no more evidence that any «LORD» spoke to them and «anointed» anyone as king than that he spoke to the Duke of Windsor to abdicate so that eventually Queen Elizabeth would be «anointed» as the British monarch.

A big magic fairy man spoke a spell and then there was earth and light before stars and then a snake talked to a woman and then the big magic fairy man had to sacrifice himself to himself to appease himself by exploiting a loophole in a plan he made himself because of an invisible disease (sin) in an invisble body part (soul) so that he doesn't have to torture us forever in the big fire pit he made even though he doesn't want anyone to ever go there but he just can't help himself.

Generally, they are asked by the patient or family member to visit, so that they may discuss personal issues that may be to painful to speak to with anyone else.

Liberals indulge in periodic public rhetorical displays of «So - to - Speak» support for the Constitution, and they like well - told history or biography about the Founders as well as anyone, but they aren't as interested in treating them as a guide.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

Christianity itself has become a principality and holds thousands captive, Before anyone comments on me calling todays Christianity a principality, (a demonic stronghold) let me just make a request that those who do answer are those who live as the followers of the way did in biblical times, that is, meeting every day, considering nothing they owned as their own, laying their lives down for the gospel (and not getting paid to do so) and having signs and wonders accompany them when they speak of the Lord.

Generally speaking, the answers are obvious, so to anyone with a modicum of discernment and common sense, the questions are rhetorical.

I would have my own students pay special attention to the Cappadocians — Basil the Great, Gregory Nazianzen, and Gregory of Nyssa — because, more than anyone else, they engaged their polytheistic rivals on their own terrain by appropriating Neoplatonism (the «Summa» of the Ancients, so to speak) and Christianizing it.

[51] The Eucharist is referred to, almost euphemistically, in this way, precisely because the first Christians believed it was so holy, that it was barely to be spoken of to anyone other than believers.

I am an avid reader of the sciences and philosophy as well so I believe that with my educational and life's background I can speak intelligently on these subjects but certainly not exhaustively and stand ready to discuss evidence (s) for and against with anyone willing to dialog without rancor or name calling or nastiness.

It is not a way that leaves room for the Holy Spirit to speak into our lives through anyone He so chooses.

We never handled snakes, in fact we denounced the practice as «tempting God» and even went so far as to say that those who participated were unsaved (but then we said that about Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans, anyone who didn't speak in tongues, etc).

I so don't want anyone to speak Christian or any other religion to me.

When a woman tries to call her family to meals and they are so bent on their own pursuits that they do not come, or tries to correct a child who pays no attention, or talks into the telephone to discover suddenly that she has been cut off or that the other party has hung up the receiver, she is not really speaking to anyone.

«We speak on this subject very cautiously and diffidently,» he writes, «rather by way of discussion than coming to definite conclusions... We suppose that the goodness of God will restore the whole creation to unity in the end... If anyone thinks that matter will be utterly destroyed, it passes my comprehension how all these substances can live and exist without material bodies, since to live without material substance is the privilege of God alone... Another perhaps may say that in the consummation all matter will be so purified that it may be thought of as a kind of ethereal substance... But only God knows.»

Anyone might appreciate the «satanic» quality of this and other NP threads — the back & forth, challenge and response, accusation and adversarialism — gleening in the vineyard of the Lord, so to speak, in manners of speaking.

One thing is indisputable and that is that Fr Peter Gumpel SJ who listened as a boy in church to the 1937 Encyclical Mit Brennender Sorge (With Burning Sorrow) is not exaggerating when he states that it was that Encyclical (Pacelli revised the first draft by the archbishop of Munich, Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber) which so infuriated Hitler that it caused him to refuse to see or speak to anyone for three days.

Why is it the atheists that are so altruistic that they will write a all out verbal assault against anyone who dares to speak against gay marriage?

3)» Why is it the atheists that are so altruistic that they will write a all out verbal assault against anyone who dares to speak against gay marriage?

Lots of expectation and very little affirmation... ------ I surely can't speak for anyone but me, but yes, tough job [but then Jesus made it clear it wasn't going to be easy, so no surprise there].

Buddah is dead cant speak from the grave so all this wisdom is lost and not able to do anything for anyone except as they can personally conform to these sayings

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

Also, how can anyone try to win anyone over to their position, so to speak.

Practically speaking, Evita has probably slightly missed its moment anyway, and Cats is still doing so terribly well everywhere that I can't imagine anyone allowing it to become a movie very quickly.

I can't speak for atheists or anyone else but myself but perhaps it's because so many Christians come off as smug, holier than thou types who shake their heads condescendingly in pity for us others who actually are crazy enough to think for ourselves.

I haven't really spoke to anyone about becoming vegan and so invited my mother and grandmother over for dinner and they could not believe that this dish was meatless.

So that's it for arsenal fans... try a lot and give it all... there's hundreds of options in the first and second divisions who fit the bill on that score!!!!... If giroud has been massive for france then it's no wonder they don't look like title winners... though having said that anyone looks massive next to gignac... figuratively speaking....

So to speak the truth we have not done anyone of the above 3.

I apologize if i'm speaking for you in the wrong context Jonestown, but I think he was trying to point out that these «squad» players that people seem to want so badly may not be as stoked at the competition within our team as we would be... Sure there's arguments for a quality upgrade with a few players, but a few may have to leave before anyone comes in.

If that happened we would still need to find a replacement and anyone with the ability would not come cheap, so this report that claims there could be a transfer swap on the cards with PSG for their German international Julian Draxler would fix that problem and kill two birds with one stone, so to speak.

We were sitting two seats below Monaco fans sitting laughing and taking the piss, and no one seemed to think that that's wrong, I've been to away grounds to watch Arsenal sat in the home team stand and respectfully stay quiets if we score, as a punch in the mouth often offends, I'm amazed at our home games, so many people who don't even speak English and seem to treat the game as a Sunday afternoon tea party, where are the old Arsenal fans born and bred Arsenal, I'm all for a multi cultural look but let's not lose anyone in the race to become global.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Ian Wright said Arsene gets angry if anyone speaks harshly to any of his players, so I doubt very much if that will ever happen.

Speaking on the United Review, he said: «It's very important for us, it's important for the team, it's important for the manager, and when it's like that, there is also competition amongst ourselves, so we always have to improve because I don't think anyone is automatically entitled to their position in that team.

I've never «hated» anyone choosing to use cheaper diapers, I just really encourage people to research the diapers and places they're being imported from before buying We've personally had to purchase some for our own baby and have been disappointed — but did so to speak from experience and learn more about these cheaper diapers....

It feels a bit uncomfortable speaking to strangers but I have never had a negative reactions from anyone when I have done so.

I needed urgent medical attention but I couldn't speak English, so I couldn't tell anyone what had happened to me.

Speaking on Radio Gold, Kofi Adams, said that, «Those who are listening to me should tell those who are not listening that NPP intends to visit terror on Ghanaians — so whenever they doubt anyone they should quickly report the person to the police.»

A Labour skew in the current electoral arrangement is, so to speak, an urban myth; the real problem is that the poor no longer vote, since they no longer have anyone to vote for.

«Don't ever disrespect anyone that is speaking out for justice because help me to understand: if I was so aggressive, why would the officers have allowed me to leave in the first place?»

I want to speak up for him and I also want to make clear that neither he nor anyone else has asked me to do so.

I've never used it and have not spoken to anyone who has, so can't comment so much on user experience.

I honestly haven't seen anyone wearing bell sleeves to work out «in the wild» so to speak yet.

These friend dates are my favorite thing, so if anyone else wants to make these plans with me speak up!!!