The court reasoned that spoliation is an evidentiary issue and not a separate cause of action, and because evidentiary issues are resolved by the trial court and not the jury, it is inappropriate to present
spoliation issues to the jury for resolution.Brookshire Bros. 2014 Tex..
The court also noted that while a trial court may hold an evidentiary hearing to assist the court in resolving
spoliation issues, such a hearing may not take place in the presence of the jury.
Rule 37 (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure proposes a three part test before considering
spoliation issues.
Ron Minkoff speaks on e-discovery
spoliation issues at the ABA National Legal Malpractice Conference in Chicago.
We are familiar with
spoliation issues, and we will work quickly to issue duty to preserve letters on your behalf.
If we're going to win your case, we can't lose it first because of
a spoliation issue.»
She mentioned a case in which a plaintiff deactivated his account and that became
a spoliation issue.
However, most of those involved believed these amendments did not adequately deal with lost or missing ESI or «
the spoliation issue.»
Not exact matches
Believe it or not, a trip through the law libraries of America illustrates that yes, discovery has even infiltrated Christmas as we examine the serious legal
issue of reindeer
spoliation.
Courts have authority to
issue sanctions for
spoliation of potential evidence, whether done intentionally or through negligence.
In some cases, the best evidence rule becomes an
issue due to
spoliation.
The practice center's main page includes federal and state court opinions related to e-discovery, federal and state rules and laws related to e-discovery, news and law reports, and BNA's E-Discovery Portfolio series, which provides an entry point to resources such as practice guides, books and treatises, and law reviews, as well as specific guidance on such
issues as understanding and preventing
spoliation.
There's this whole «
spoliation»
issue that could become problematic if you just leave things laying around.
Spoliation of video evidence is a particular
issue in premises liability claims, because the establishment that owns the camera is often the defendant in the case.
However, at least one other court has relied on its inherent authority to sanction ESI
spoliation when the conduct at
issue appeared to fall within the scope of Rule 37 (e).
Destruction Requirement Disputed The Ohio Supreme Court addressed the
issue of intentional
spoliation of evidence in its 1993 Smith v. Howard Johnson Co..
Advisory notes are only advisory, however, and in the year since, some judges have already
issued decisions expressing a willingness to still fall back on inherent authority for
spoliation sanctions, if they deem it necessary:
In late October, Master Ronna Brott of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice
issued a highly pointed decision that encapsulates Canadian courts» unwillingness to entertain
spoliation disputes before trial and, to some extent, to tolerate the increasingly common problem of lost records and things.
New material relates to: Requests for further production, Demands for particulars, Preservation of evidence,
Spoliation, Discovery Plan, Proportion and Marginal Utility, Cost Shifting, Admissibility of Internet Information, Privacy
Issues, Third Party Information and Norwich orders, and Anton Piller Orders... [more]
New material relates to: Requests for further production, Demands for particulars, Preservation of evidence,
Spoliation, Discovery Plan, Proportion and Marginal Utility, Cost Shifting, Admissibility of Internet Information, Privacy
Issues, Third Party Information and Norwich orders, and Anton Piller Orders.
Legal holds remain a common source of
issues for litigants, particularly with regard to
spoliation and the question of reasonable efforts to preserve, and rapidly evolving sources and custodian behaviors are creating new challenges.
Beyond the dramatic, recent example provided by the Volkswagen case, legal holds remain a common source of
issues for litigants, particularly with regard to the
spoliation that can follow an ineffective or nonexistent legal hold and the question of whether reasonable efforts to preserve were taken.