Sentences with phrase «spontaneous creation»
The phrase "spontaneous creation" refers to something that occurs suddenly and naturally, without any pre-planning or external intervention. It means that something is created or happens on its own without any deliberate effort or control. Full definition
This outfit was a really spontaneous creation of mine, but out of experience I can say that these are often the best looks I make.
texturecharmscolour.de
Then we do not exist, if spontaneous creation is what bought us her.
But to counter that the concept of spontaneous creation from nothing is a hard concept for the human brain to accept either.
The possibility of spontaneous creation does not address the problem of supernatural force or design for that matter.
Can you imagine believing that the universe exists because of spontaneous creation nothing, and that life on earth just spontaneously generated from non living matter?
You need to dig a little deeper into the term spontaneous creation.
But, in simple terms, his theory of spontaneous creation implies an overall more grand design — in that the life instructions could not have been created by life itself, but came from somewhere.
= > evidence for supernatural causation is falsifiable (existence of dark energy, expanding universe, and dimensions beyond the 4 natural) whereas spontaneous creation is not.
Well, if I'm reading the article correctly, he seems to be suggesting that there exists a mathematical model that demonstrates a 100 % probability of spontaneous creation assuming the existence of gravity.
His models and hypotheses may predict spontaneous creation, but I'm not certain he has enough evidence to make that a conclusive statement.
how sad... I pity this man so much... spontaneous creation???????... how about this: God in all his glorious, majestic power created EVERYTHING!!!
And If spontaneous creation needs anything, it is evidence to support the theory,
*** Spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist,» ***
Spontaneous creation probably refers to the idea that neither space nor time existed before the Big Bang.
You, not I, claim spontaneous creation.
It also caused Hawking to adopt spontaneous creation (not me) as an alternative to God (or god) and or use multiverse as a fallback position.
Spontaneous creation does not answer the question of why humans and the universe exists.
You said, «evidence for supernatural causation is falsifiable (existence of dark energy, expanding universe, and dimensions beyond the 4 natural) whereas spontaneous creation is not.
If Spontaneous creation is how we arrived here.
Spontaneous Creation.
The source of this particular flaw lies in your inability to conceive of spontaneous creation, set in motion by nothing more than the same rules that govern why everything is the way it is today, to say nothing of attempting to actually put mathematical proof to that concept!
So it's because of the existence of «gravity» that spontaneous creation can occur — how brilliant!
He ca n`t get a degree in bio-engineering and build a new body for himself by spontaneous creation and transfer his mind into the new body, because he is not that smart?
= > all pre big bang cosmology remains speculative as do all «spontaneous creation» or «something out of nothing» mussing.
Spontaneous creation he says.
@ME II — From Hawking and his grand design... «Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist».
«Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing,»... «Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.
Hawking said: «Spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.»
if that's the case then who or what made the «Spontaneous creation» happen?
«Spontaneous creation»?
«Spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist,» he wrote in the introduction of the book, which was published in September.
Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.»
«everything came from spontaneous creation» nice try stephen, scientists can't even explain how a human being, being a lump of protein got its extremities moving without getting jacked to an electric plug.
Even if Hawking is right that gravity is necessary for spontaneous creation, that doesn't prove it is sufficient for spontaneous creation, for there is no gravity where there is no matter.
It has been shown (Miller - Urey experiment) that non-living matter, under the right conditions, can result in a spontaneous creation of life.
Yet, as was pointed out, Hawking and Mlodinow already concede that, for their ideas to work, a law such as gravity has to exist, and thus their «spontaneous creation» is not as «spontaneous» as they claim.
In the book, they try to argue for a spontaneous creation of the universe that requires no explanation or origin.
Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.
How can you possibly say you lean towards a theory that has no evidence (spontaneous creation) over one with current evidence?
In the hard sciences Hawkings M theory or multiverse theory can not answer the question of the origin of life (this includes his reference to spontaneous creation).
This one was another spontaneous creation.