His descriptions and enumeration of microbes seemed to support the idea of
spontaneous generation of life (in pepper infusions no less!)
Even though Leeuwenhoek could not disprove the notion of
spontaneous generation of life, his findings showed that he was a creative genius.
Not exact matches
And the chances
of spontaneous generation from dissolved rocks (chemical
life) is 1 in 10 ^ 7800.
In 1864, Louis Pasteur proved that point in one case, showing that
spontaneous generation (that
life could originate from nonliving matter, also called abiogenesis), though accepted by some in the scientific community (such as Belgian chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont about 200 years earlier, who also believed that the basic elements
of the universe was just air and water), was untrue.
Until the student
of origins can produce repeated examples
of spontaneous generation (
living organisms created entirely from non-
living matter) followed by an evolutionary process, his speculations remain in the realm
of philosophy and outside the strict standards
of modern science.
Aristotle was the first to suggest the theory
of spontaneous generation: that
life could arise from «putrefying earth or vegetable matter,» or from the «insides
of animals.»
Perhaps we should remember the experiments
of Francesco Redi, Lazzaro Spallanzani, and Louis Pasteur — basic biological experiments that put to rest the theory
of spontaneous generation, the belief that
life had arisen spontaneously from dead matter (as, for instance, maggots from rotting meat and mice from bundles
of old clothes)-- and not make the same mistake for the origin
of the universe itself.