Sentences with phrase «spouses hires an attorney»

A couple who has not been married long and has no minor children to care for and few assets to divide may be able to complete their divorce without either spouse hiring an attorney, particularly if their state has a simplified process that fits their situation.

In other states, it is common for the couple to agree to the terms of their divorce and then have one spouse hire an attorney to prepare the paperwork.

It depends on how complex your case is, how many issues are involved, the level of contention, how motivated your attorney is to file things quickly and prepare for hearings, whether your spouse hires an attorney right away, whether you and / or your spouse stay with the attorney (s) you originally hired, the judge you get, the weather, and pretty much any other unknown.

In divorce litigation, you and your spouse each hire attorneys (or not) and go to court.

This simply means that each spouses hires an attorney solely for the purpose of helping them reach a divorce agreement.

If lack of trust is a major obstacle, then consider a collaborative divorce, where each spouse hires an attorney, but both agree to stay out of court.

You and your spouse hire attorneys who are trained in collaborative law and you work with your attorneys, as well as a team of other collaborative professionals, such as a neutral divorce financial planner, a child specialist, and a divorce coach.

Not exact matches

Would you hire your spouse's Attorney in a divorce battle, or if someone brought a law suit against you would you hire the opposing side's attorney, Attorney in a divorce battle, or if someone brought a law suit against you would you hire the opposing side's attorney, attorney, hell no!

If both spouses can hire attorneys, then the question becomes not whether they can afford collaborative practice, but whether they can afford any billable hours being spent on anything other than trying to reach an out - of - court agreement.

Share this information with your spouse and encourage him or her to also hire an attorney who is familiar with and committed to the collaborative law process.

Just because one spouse could potentially afford to hire an attorney and pay for divorce - related costs does not mean that he or she can not request an award under Section 2030.

When one of their installation legal offices has an opening the hiring authority there has the option to go into that database and pull out a military spouse attorney and hire quicker than if they went through the normal hiring process.

There are many reasons why a spouse would want to hire an attorney for the limited scope representation described above, but the main reasons are (i) to finalize a divorce sooner rather than later and (ii) to have the peace of mind of having an attorney appear at the final hearing in front of a judge.

Each spouse hires his and her own attorney, and the two attorneys and two clients sign a participation agreement formalizing the pledge not to fight one another.

Talk to your spouse about it now, before you hire attorneys.

And once one spouse has hired an attorney that doesn't believe in collaborative law — you can pretty much kiss any chance at engaging in the collaborative process good - bye.

If you or your spouse hires an untrained and inexperienced Collaborative Divorce attorney, the result will be subpar at best and, at worst, will leave you dissatisfied and disheartened.

In collaborative divorce, a relatively new form of dispute resolution, each spouse hires their own attorney, and the two attorneys and their clients negotiate directly with each other without resorting to litigation.

In divorce mediation, the parties hire an independent neutral third party who brings the spouses together (with their attorneys if any were hired) to assist them to reach a satisfactory divorce settlement.

If you and your spouse are unable to see eye - to - eye about what your future family may look like, you will want to consider hiring a divorce attorney.

Examining the Paperwork In some divorce proceedings, one person chooses to hire an attorney, while the other spouse chooses to go it alone.

Whether it's deciding custody arrangements, finances, or the division of property, chances are the spouse who has hired an attorney will come out with a far better deal.

MSJDN supports military spouses in the legal profession by advocating for licensing accommodations for military spouse attorneys; educating the public about the challenges faced by career - minded military spouses and their families; encouraging the hiring of military spouses; and providing a network connecting military spouse attorneys with each other and their supporters.

Litigation is a process where each spouse hires a separate attorney to represent his or her individual interests in a court room.

Talk to your spouse about it now, before you hire attorneys.

Each spouse hires a separate collaborative attorney who advises them throughout the process.

The new law promotes fairness in divorce cases by giving a needy spouse — who does not have the money to retain legal counsel — the same opportunity as the wealthier spouse to hire a skilled Orlando divorce attorney who is competent to handle all aspects of their case.

You might need to hire a professional to track down your spouse and serve the papers, and the likelihood of needing an attorney to help you navigate the process is higher.

These are divorces where each spouse hires a «pit bull» attorney, they both engage in a scorched earth strategy, and they try to win at all costs, even as both of them tend to lose.

And once one spouse has hired an attorney that doesn't believe in collaborative law — you can pretty much kiss any chance at engaging in the collaborative process good - bye.

If your spouse has been unable or unwilling to negotiate in a fair, open and respectful manner, try hiring an experienced divorce attorney - mediator who is trained to communicate with even the most disagreeable of persons.

Other legitimate needs, such as self - support by an unemployed homemaker spouse or hiring an attorney, could affect whether or not the non-withdrawing spouse gets reimbursed.

If you hire an attorney or private investigator, that person can make a diligent effort to find your spouse on your behalf; you don't have to do it personally.

For this reason, even though it is not absolutely required to hire an attorney during divorce Mediation, it is highly recommended that each spouse does so in order to have someone specifically in his or her corner as an advocate.

While courts tend to frown on pre-emptive strikes aimed at leaving the non-withdrawing spouse too broke to hire an attorney, it may find it permissible to «clean out» the account to catch up on past - due marital bills or prevent the repossession of marital property.

In divorce mediation, usually three attorneys are hired: one for you, one for your spouse, and a third attorney to serve as the divorce mediator.

Whether or not your spouse has hired an attorney, and no matter if you both can or can not agree on important issues, having a dedicated Austin divorce attorney on your side is in your best interest.

Each spouse hires his and her own attorney, and the two attorneys and two clients sign a participation agreement formalizing the pledge not to fight one another.

In order for you to file for a contested divorce in Massachusetts, you and your spouse should hire attorneys to represent you in front of the judge.

If you want to get divorced amicably, don't hire a shark attorney who will only escalate the conflict between you and your spouse.

Adversarial Divorce: In an adversarial divorce, you and your spouse each hire an adversarial, traditional attorney to fight for you.

Collaborative divorce is a private dispute resolution option which requires each spouse to: (i) treat one another respectfully, (ii) be open and honest in his or her financial dealings, (iii) agree to settle things privately and not to engage in courtroom battles, (iv) hire an attorney for the limited purpose of helping the parties reach an agreement which addresses both parties» concerns, (v) utilize a neutral facilitator (which is substantially the same as a mediator except anything said in front of the facilitator may be disclosed to the other spouse), and, (vi) if there are substantial assets and liabilities, engage a neutral financial professional.

If you or your spouse have written up your settlement agreement, petition, and other documents, but you want an attorney to review the settlement agreement and other documents prior to executing it, you can hire an attorney on a limited basis for that purpose.

On the other hand, if your spouse has already hired a shark attorney and you're in court fighting for your life, you need to hire an attorney who can handle that level of conflict.

People file pro se because they can't afford to hire an attorney, or they agree with their spouse about all divorce issues and can file uncontested, or they become dissatisfied with their lawyer and feel they could do a better job on their own.

Each spouse also agrees, in writing, with his or her own attorney that if the matter can not be settled, the attorney will withdraw from representation and the spouse will have to hire a new lawyer to litigate the case.

When one spouse hires a lawyer, the other spouse must do the same because no one should try lawyer pro se against an attorney.

Each spouse hires their own attorney who commits to treating both spouses with respect and dignity.

If both spouses can hire attorneys, then the question becomes not whether they can afford collaborative practice, but whether they can afford any billable hours being spent on anything other than trying to reach an out - of - court agreement.

I am in full agreement with Ron, and I strongly believe that most divorcing families would benefit if both spouses hired collaborative attorneys.