At this point anyone who still
spouses other solutions is akin in my mind to climate change deniers.
Not exact matches
With this sort of agreement as the North Star toward which everyone looks throughout the process, the private interactions between the client and the attorney are more about looking for creative (sometimes out of the box)
solutions to parenting, financial, and logistical issues that need to be addressed in the divorce, rather than the generation of one - sided proposals that do not take the interests of the
other spouse into account.
The items included «Both
spouses express feelings to each
other about the financial matter in question» and «Both
spouses suggest possible
solutions and compromises to the financial issue.»
Through Marital Mediation, we can explore
solutions that would allow both
spouses to remain true to their natures while alleviating the fears of the
other.
It can serve as a temporary
solution for couples desiring a «trial» divorce, or as a permanent arrangement for couples unable to divorce because of religious convictions or financial affairs, such as the need for one
spouse to continue on the
other's health insurance.
That said, if you and your
spouse are on talking and negotiable terms and are able to reach agreements on topics such as property, debt, minor children and
other key areas, a marital settlement agreement could be a realistic
solution.
Follow that up by simply offering that one idea might be to go to marriage counseling, and be open to
other solutions suggested by your
spouse.
For example, the
solution is to have one
spouse buyout the
other spouse.
Research shows that one of the best predictors of a positive divorce process and outcome is the selection by divorcing
spouses of Collaborative Professionals who respect each
other and who have successful track records of settling cases together, working together effectively and efficiently to help you reach creative, respectful and thoughtful
solutions.
If
spouses are at war, they are likely to see each
other as the problem and the divorce as the
solution.
The real problem is how to divvy everything up in divorce, and divorcing
spouses won't arrive at the best
solution for their family until they collaborate on resolving their issues by working together, not against each
other.
Plus, trial judges are forced to choose a rather limited range of options, whereas Collaborative Divorce enables
spouses to develop creative
solutions — including those related to child custody, support, asset allocation, and
other important issues that arise in a divorce.
In Collaborative Divorce, on the
other hand, the
solutions are entirely generated by you and your
spouse according to your own values and priorities.
But if you're looking at life insurance as a sure way to leave a sizable bequest to your surviving
spouse or
other heirs or as a means of building cash value, whole may be a better
solution.