GHG amounts are fixed after 2100 and ice melt is zero, but after two centuries of
stable climate forcing the AMOC has not recovered to its earlier state.
Not exact matches
Canada certainly has attracted large amounts of FDI recently thanks to its relatively
stable economic
climate, abundant resources, proximity to the United States and skilled work
force.
What sort of gargantuan
forcing does he believe caused those changes in such a
stable climate system?
This was a relatively
stable climate (for several thousand years, 20,000 years ago), and a period where we have reasonable estimates of the radiative
forcing (albedo changes from ice sheets and vegetation changes, greenhouse gas concentrations (derived from ice cores) and an increase in the atmospheric dust load) and temperature changes.
radiative
forcing = RF «=» V0 feedback (including planck response) «=» voltage across resistor = i * R «=» F * T (negative for
stable climate) radiative disequilibrium «=» v0 + i * R = voltage across inductor = L * di / dt «=» heating rate = C * dT / dt okay...
How can we be comfortable saying that
climate is
stable when we can't even really model such a huge
force?
As a surrogate for the real world in the absence of
forcings,
climate models do tend to a
stable quasi-equilibria (with some intrinsic variability of course, but with a
stable climate).
RCP4.5 aims to achieve
stable radiative
forcing in 2100; however, this does not imply that greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gas concentrations, or the
climate system are
stable.
Warmer temperatures from
climate change are
forcing polar bears to swim longer distances to find
stable sea ice.
How
stable is the atmosphere at present under a total anthropogenic GHG
forcing — since 1750AD — of 1.6 Watt / m2 (Figure SPM - 2 in the IPCC «
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis»)?
Climate can be rather stable if nothing is causing it to change, but when the climate is «pushed» or forced to change, it often jumps suddenly to very different conditions, rather than changing gra
Climate can be rather
stable if nothing is causing it to change, but when the
climate is «pushed» or forced to change, it often jumps suddenly to very different conditions, rather than changing gra
climate is «pushed» or
forced to change, it often jumps suddenly to very different conditions, rather than changing gradually.
Climate can be rather stable if nothing is causing it to change, but when the climate is «pushed» or forced to cha
Climate can be rather
stable if nothing is causing it to change, but when the
climate is «pushed» or forced to cha
climate is «pushed» or
forced to change, it
Biologists are warning that warmer temperatures from
climate change are
forcing polar bears to swim longer distances to find
stable sea ice.
Surely, given the remarkably
stable nature of our
climate, the larger the
forcing, the larger the probability of a significant feedback event occurring.
According to
forcing from these various orbital cycles and oscillations the
climate should be
stable with a very slight cooling and the next ice age would have been in 30 - 50K years.
This new study suggests that
stable effective governance, sustained economic growth and reduced population growth are essential if conflict and
forced displacement of people are to be reduced in Africa, which will be severally affected by
climate change.
Given the timeframe in which the earth has remained relatively
stable wrt
climate, have we really been observing the
climate long enough to know all of the feedbacks and
forcings?
This assumption is where the hotheads went wrong, way back when — they didn't think of
climate as fundamentally wobbly (variable from internal generated
forcings), but as
stable until
forced.
However, when the AMOC is
forced to collapse in more complicated
climate models, it often recovers gradually after the
forcing is removed, suggesting the off - state may not be
stable.
Our sun is without doubt the single greatest
force impacting the global
climate, but it is a remarkably
stable star — which is why we're all here to have this conversation.
If the Earth's greenhouse is caused by the
forcing model used by
climate scientists, then the GHE should be very
stable over the course of the year because overall there is little change to the atmospheric concentration of the greenhouse gases that cause the GHE in the
forcing model that they use.
Shifting
climates under external
forcing, if they follow the general behaviors of other complex systems with Chaos, don't generally form
stable states during the perturbation, and especially if the perturbation itself is irregular.