This is a really poor explanation for the extremely
stable temperature cycle that has dominated for ten thousand years.
Most of you are ignoring
my stable temperature cycle theory.
Not exact matches
The units proved able to deliver current at high
temperatures with a
stable voltage window of 3 volts over 120 charge - discharge
cycles and featured both the thermal stability of solid - state electrolytes and the wetting properties of liquid electrolytes, assuring good contact with the electrodes.
Therefore, as long as the overall composition of other Earth - like planets are the similar to ours, we would expect them to sport a carbon
cycle (either organic or inorganic), also providing a
stable climate for them — as long as the planets remain within the
temperature range where the carbon
cycle can work.
2) Hybrid sulfur thermochemical water - splitting: In the HyS Thermochemical
cycle, the separator needs to be
stable at
temperatures up to 150oC while being conductive to protons and a barrier for sulfur.
It remains that there are no evidence lines on a global scale that indicate the planetary
temperature is either
stable or cooling, or that it is natural
cycle.
Weathering may depend on properties like
temperature, pCO2, land ice abrasion, and sea level change but has been suggested to be
stable over glacial − interglacial
cycles (54).
Stephen writes: «In the case of the Earth's atmosphere a change in solar input is met with a change in evaporation rates and thus the speed of the whole hydrological
cycle keeping the overall
temperature stable despite a change in solar power input.»
Note the record of the last «Ice - age
cycle»: we «eyeball» that the
temperature revolves around a
stable mean (when we «imagine» the other Ice age
cycles).