The unintended consequences of high -
stakes accountability policies are well documented.
It should be noted, though, that we as a nation have been relying upon similar high - stakes educational policies since the late 1970s (i.e., for now over 35 years); however, we have literally no research evidence that these high -
stakes accountability policies have yielded any of their intended effects, as still perpetually conceptualized (see, for example, Nevada's recent legislative ruling here) and as still advanced via large - and small - scale educational policies (e.g., we are still A Nation At Risk in terms of our global competitiveness).
Not exact matches
Why should our leaders be exempt from real - time
accountability when so much more is at
stake - big decisions about public
policy, the use of your money, the course of our future?
In 2013, Deming was named a William T. Grant Scholar for his project, The Long - Run Influence of School
Accountability: Impacts, Mechanisms and Policy Implications, which explores the impact of test - based school accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement colleg
Accountability: Impacts, Mechanisms and
Policy Implications, which explores the impact of test - based school
accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high - stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement colleg
accountability on post-secondary attainment and earnings, how high -
stakes accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based accountability in high school can complement colleg
accountability impacts outcomes, and how test - based
accountability in high school can complement colleg
accountability in high school can complement college preparation.
To evaluate the claim that No Child Left Behind and other test - based
accountability policies are making teaching less attractive to academically talented individuals, the researchers compare the SAT scores of new teachers entering classrooms that typically face
accountability - based test achievement pressures (grade 4 — 8 reading and math) and classrooms in those grades that do not involve high -
stakes testing.
As we continue to study choice - based
policies in K — 12 education, one challenge we must confront is the push - pull created by high -
stakes accountability measures designed to assess schools, students, and educators, based solely on test scores — an area where choice proponents and opponents often find common ground.
By giving students a greater and more immediate
stake in their schoolwork and their learning, such student -
accountability policies could bridge the gap between effort and reward.
Brian Gill studies K — 12 education
policy, including charter schools, educator effectiveness, and the implementation and impacts of high -
stakes testing and other
accountability regimes.
Past federal
policies, including No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top, pushed corporate - styled, top - down reforms such as high -
stakes testing and draconian
accountability schemes.
The main topics covered were: 1) the respondent «s perceptions of the major state - level
policy initiatives of importance over the last few years (allowing the respondent to determine the starting year /
policy); 2) specific
policy initiatives in two arenas:
accountability and promoting school leadership; 3) a discussion of the
policy initiators and actors, and their
stakes and stands on major
policy initiatives; and 4) their comments about the way in which groups and individuals work together or separately to exercise influence over educational
policy.
In addition, abundant research has been conducted to examine the impact that movements toward standardization,
accountability, and high -
stakes assessment systems have had on teachers» practices, beliefs, attitudes, and overall effectiveness (e.g., Hamilton & Stecher, 2004; National Board on Educational Testing and Public
Policy, 2003; Parke, Lane, & Stone, 2006).
With TCSA's Model
Policies you can protect and simplify your open - enrollment charter school operations in this time of high -
stakes accountability.
Rather, Sanders and his associates at SAS Institute Inc. greatly influenced our nation in terms of the last decade of our nation's educational
policies, as largely bent on high -
stakes teacher
accountability for educational reform.
Obama's «Race to the Top»
policy — the brainchild of Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, the former «CEO» of Chicago Public Schools — further codifies high -
stakes testing by allocating scarce federal resources to those states most aggressively implementing these so - called
accountability measures.
Test - based
accountability policies have also led educators to focus on students who have a reasonable chance, with additional support, of passing high -
stakes tests, to the detriment of those students at the greatest risk of dropping out (Booher - Jennings 2005).
Since little has been done concurrent with high
stakes accountability to actually support and improve schools with resources and innovative services, the result has been a
policy environment where the tests have consumed more and more of the curriculum.
If we let current
policies answer this question for us, we're back to test scores; after all, nothing else matters in an era of high -
stakes accountability.
Dr. Brian Gill Dr. Brian Gill studies K — 12 education
policy, including charter schools, measurements of teacher, principal, and school effectiveness, and the implementation and impacts of high -
stakes testing and other
accountability regimes.
Raise questions or complications to the exercise of standards, high
stakes accountability testing, and their utility as
policy levers and the entire exercise gets a lot less laudatory.
Perhaps most offensive of all, we equate the need for high
stakes testing, and command - and - control
policies, with the obligation to ensure the protection of the civil rights for our most at - risk children without any conversation about the funding, or even more necessary,
accountability for those holding others accountable.
For example, the law eliminated an
accountability system that punished schools which failed to increase the percentages of students proficient in math and reading each year — a
policy largely blamed for creating the high -
stakes culture of over-testing.
Shepard (1991) pointed out that teachers have little control over the
policies proscribing
accountability through «high -
stakes» tests.
This is a must read for all of you following the current
policy trends not only surrounding teacher - level
accountability, but also high -
stakes testing in general.