Not exact matches
As states across the U.S. move to adopt standardized tests as a means to determine grade
promotion and school graduation, new research presented in the Harvard Educational Review shows that sole reliance on high -
stakes tests as a graduation requirement may increase inequities among
students by both race and gender.
High
stakes testing policies requiring
students to pass standardized tests for
promotion and graduation deepen educational inequity between whites and minorities and widen the educational gap between affluent and impoverished
students, according to two studies of education reform in Texas.
Last week, Gates Foundation education chief Vicki Phillips wrote a «letter to our partners» urging that states give
students and teachers time to adjust to the new Common Core standards before using those standards as factors «in high -
stakes decisions on teacher evaluation or
student promotion for the next two years, during this transition.»
Conduct research on the consequences, both intended and unintended, on high -
stakes testing and its impact on the
promotion, retention, and evaluation of
students, teachers, principals, schools, and school districts.
The authors demonstrate that the effects of high -
stakes testing pro- grams on outcomes, such as retention and graduation, are different from the results of using grades alone, and that some groups of
students who are already faring poorly, such as African Americans and Latinos / Latinas, will do even worse if high -
stakes testing programs are used as criteria for
promotion and graduation.
Also, the state's social
promotion policy raises the
stakes for
students in grades 4 and 8.
The
stakes attached to them now commonly include school funding and evaluation and closure, teacher pay and evaluation and firings, and of course
student promotion and self - perception.
We have been especially aggressive fighting against the misuse and overuse of high -
stakes standardized tests and CPS's harmful, ineffective, wasteful elementary
student promotion policy.
A rethinking of
promotion and enrollment policies so that high -
stakes decisions for
students are made using multiple measures and not a single test score.
As you noted, high
stakes testing — using tests for
student promotion, teacher evolution, and even school closure — has certainly increased the controversy surrounding the Common Core.
Accuracy requires that
students have multiple opportunities to pass any test when the test results are used to make high -
stakes decision, such as
promotion to the next grade or graduation from high school.
Now, if we could just get schools and districts to stop using standardized tests — which have ALL THE SAME PROBLEMS — for such high -
stakes purposes as
student promotion and retention, graduation, and teacher evaluation, we'd really be getting somewhere.
High -
stakes tests are used to make important decisions such as
student promotion or graduation, granting teacher tenure, or sanctioning schools for poor performance.
So we join the Gates Foundation in calling on state policymakers to consider that assessment results should not be taken into account in high -
stakes decisions on teacher evaluation or
student promotion for the next two years, during this transition here in Tennessee.
Often these tests are referred to as «high
stakes,» although some states have a mechanism for graduation or
promotion that avoids retention consequences when the
student has otherwise earned graduation or
promotion.
No single measure should be used to make high -
stakes decisions, including
promotion or graduation, involving any
student.
Standardized testing has come under increasing scrutiny across the nation, particularly in its use for high -
stakes decisions such as
student promotion, in teacher evaluations, and for other school personnel decisions.