Downshifting: Teaching (for Understanding) in a Lower Gear An expanding curriculum and high -
stakes testing drives many teachers to just «cover the curriculum.»
Voice of Experience: Downshifting: Teaching (for Understanding) in a Lower Gear An expanding curriculum and high -
stakes testing drives many teachers to just «cover the curriculum.»
Not exact matches
They shouldn't be
driven by high -
stakes testing or be box - fillers for college applications.
A good start would be to get rid of high -
stakes multiple - choice barrier
tests which
drive instruction toward low level teaching to the
test.
New Book from The Civil Rights Project Highlights the Limits of
Test -
Driven Reforms A new book from The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University finds that the current overreliance on high -
stakes testing threatens to deepen America's educational inequities.
Educators then need to adopt processes — such as discovery -
driven innovation — for
testing, iterating, and refining their blended - learning models in low - cost, low -
stakes ways before taking them to scale across a school or district.
Collective human judgment informed by reliable evidence is a much better way to assess teaching and learning in schools than data -
driven judgment based on high -
stakes standardized
tests.
Where instead of high -
stakes tests, students benefit from continuous and seamless assessments that transparently
drive moment - by - moment adaptations.
Other parents view opting out as a form of outsider protest; they support public education, but believe that high -
stakes standardized
tests have become the tail that wags the dog,
driving far too much of what occurs in their children's classrooms.
Data -
driven decision - making within a professional learning community: Assessing the predictive qualities of curriculum - based measurements to a high -
stakes, state
test of reading achievement at the elementary level.
Aspiring and new teachers often have a desire to engage students in issues of social justice but find themselves overwhelmed when presented with scripted curriculum, high
stakes test prep, and mentors without the
drive or experience of doing it themselves.
Even in an education system
driven by the Common Core State Standards and high -
stakes testing, teachers must adapt their methods to the styles of the modern learner.
Data has become a loaded term in our high -
stakes and
test -
driven world, but don't let the buzzwords skew the value of good information.
These are high -
stakes tests, and while they are necessary, they do not
drive my teaching.
After more than a decade of
test -
driven, high -
stakes accountability in the No Child Left Behind era, many educators and policymakers in the United States are looking to move toward a more thoughtful approach.
According to organizers, the rally is being called «Win Back Wednesday» because public education must be «won back» from the profit -
driven entities behind high -
stakes testing and school privatization schemes and returned to actual stakeholders: parents, students, and educators.
High
Stakes Testing, NCLB, Race to the Top, Common Core etc. have never been about educational processes they are political processes
driven by business interests.
In today's climate of high
stakes testing, business leaders and politicians continue to demand better results with data
driven assessments and
test scores.
Many feel that the high -
stakes nature of
testing at the state level
drives a large quantity of
tests at other levels, and leads to a disproportionately large amount of instructional time being devoted to
test prep.
He seems to think that lowering expectations will be more «relevant» to our students, and he uses popular mythology in attempting to make his case, such as «high
stakes accountability
drives dropouts» and «teaching to the
test is taking away from learning», neither of which has any foundation.
The theory relies on parental and public demand for better «outcomes» as
driven by high -
stakes standardized
testing.
Unfortunately, any attempt to
drive education improvement with high -
stakes testing and accountability may have a fundamental flaw.
• An expansion of high -
stakes testing that turns schools into
testing factories and
drives families and top teachers away from public education.
In light of the uneven track record of previous
test -
driven reforms, wary educators might reasonably ask, Will better high -
stakes assessments really change anything?
One need to go no farther than a short
drive down the turnpike to civil rights expert, Dr. Yohuru Williams of Fairfield University, who has demonstrated with thunderous authority, through the actual words and sayings of Dr. Martin Luther King, that the leader of the U.S. civil rights movement would have never stood beside those who seek to privatize and monetize public education, nor would he have supported the high
stakes testing obsession that has crippled the promise of public education, dehumanized children, and
driven countless educators out of the profession.
WHEREAS, it is widely recognized that high -
stakes standardized
testing is an inadequate and often unreliable measure of both student learning and educator effectiveness, and the over-reliance on standardized
testing has caused considerable collateral damage in many schools, including narrowing the curriculum, teaching to the
test, reducing student's love of learning, pushing students out of school,
driving teachers out of the profession, and undermining school climate; and
Author, speaker & outspoken advocate against the current Standards movement, particularly as
driven by high -
stakes, fill - in - the - blank
tests.
And as Kevin Welner and William Mathis of University of Colorado at Boulder remind us in this policy memo, what we need is «sustained, fair, adequate and equitable investment in all our children sufficient to provide them their educational birthright...» That will not happen while high
stakes testing is
driving our education system.
Over a decade of research shows that an over emphasis on high -
stakes standardized
tests narrows curriculum, creates social and emotional stress for students and families,
drives committed teachers out of the profession, and turns schools into
test - prep factories with principals forced to comply as overseers — especially in low - scoring schools.
Collective human judgment informed by reliable evidence is a much better way to assess teaching and learning in schools than data -
driven judgment based on high
stakes standardized
tests.
Proponents of high -
stakes testing have argued further that it is students who have done least well in schools who will most benefit from
test -
driven change.
The culture of high -
stakes testing that currently
drives educational policy would make implementing CRP nation - wide challenging.
Ever wondered how tough a
driving test would be if your phone was at
stake along with your life?
With Michigan going all - in on autonomous car
testing, GM will be doing a lot more with the Bolt, including trials for self -
driving tech and loans to Lyft, which the automaker bought a
stake in last year.