There's an ever - growing list of companies taking
a stance against hate - speech and now the fight is being brought to the digital music industry as well.
Did the protestors, by effectively making the area surrounding the planned talk so unsafe that it had to be cancelled, infringe on the speaker's first amendment rights or simply take a militant
stance against hate speech?
Not exact matches
I am not a rabid carbon -
hating enviromaniac, but I nonetheless do have some serious reservations about the American conservative
stance against climate change theory and Mr. Lomborg's objectivity of thought.