Sentences with phrase «stance width»

"Stance width" refers to the distance between a person's feet when standing or performing a certain activity, such as sports or exercise. It can be wide, where the feet are spread apart, or narrow, where the feet are closer together. Stance width is important in maintaining stability, balance, and proper form during movements. Full definition
Everyone has different proportions, a different ideal stance width and the corresponding torso angle to keep the bar over their mid foot.
Balance (perceived and actual) and preferred stance width during pregnancy.
Performing back squats with greater stance width seems to involve greater gluteus maximus EMG amplitude (McCaw & Melrose, 1999; Paoli et al. 2009).
The DPN group also displayed a significantly wider stance width compared to the other groups during stair descent only: mean for DPN 17 cm versus 15 cm for both diabetes patients without DPN and control groups.
Assessing the effect of stance width, Escamilla et al. (2001) compared the leg press performed with a narrow stance and with a wide stance (1 vs. 2 times hip width).
If you are training for powerlifting and performing assistance work, it is beneficial to use synergistic stance widths.
Performing the leg press with a low foot placement is beneficial for gastrocnemius muscle activity, but stance width does not make any difference.
Performing the leg press with a low foot placement appears beneficial to gastrocnemius muscle activity, while stance width appears to make little difference.
This would desirable if you want do sumo deadlifts, sumo rack pulls or sumo squats inside the rack, and if your sumo stance width is actually greater than 42» (the internal width dimension of both the T - 3 and X-3).
Studies have reported that several factors affect the magnitude of the hip extension moment measured during back squats in addition to the type of subjects and the percentage of 1RM used, including stance width, technique, bar speed and squat depth.
In a nutshell, the anatomic traits that are associated with a more upright squatting posture include: greater heel elevation, greater ankle dorsiflexion mobility, shorter femur length, longer torso length, wider stance width, more abduction, a higher bar position on the back, greater quadriceps strength and increased intent to target the knee extensors.
On the other hand, anatomic traits that lead to a more forward leaning squatting posture include: no heel elevation, restricted ankle dorsiflexion mobility, longer femur length, shorter torso length, narrower stance width, less abduction, a lower bar position on the back, greater gluteal strength and increased intent to target the hip extensors.
Greater stance width in the squat and deadlift, and squeezing a medicine ball between the legs in the leg press may increase adductor longus muscle activity, but the adductor magnus does not appear to be similarly affected.
Studies have investigated the effects of stance width and weight belt usage during back squats on adductor magnus EMG amplitude (Zink et al. 2001; Paoli et al 2009).
It's not about being as upright as humanly possible, it's about using the ideal stance width and corresponding back angle for your physical proportions.
Regardless of what you personally believe is best, it's up to your hip anatomy to determine your optimal squat variation, stance width and feet position.
How much will vary depending on your hip mobility and stance width, among other factors.
Comparing the effect of squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) reported no differences in hip moment arm lengths between the narrow, medium, and wide stance width squats at any point in the lowering and lifting phases, except at 45 degrees of knee flexion in the lifting phase, when the medium and wide stance width squats displayed greater hip moment arm lengths than narrow stance width squats.
Comparing different stance widths, both McCaw and Melrose (1999) and Paoli et al. (2009) found that muscle activity was greater during squats with a wide stance width compared to those with a narrower stance width.
Assessing stance width, Escamilla et al. (2001) compared the back squat with stance widths equal to 1 and 2.0 times hip width with loads equal to the 12RM and found that the narrow stance produced superior gastrocnemius muscle activity compared to the wide stance during the back squat.
Without the gear, you must take in the stance width and adjust the torso angle accordingly.
Few studies have been performed comparing hamstrings EMG amplitude during the deadlift and its variations while varying load, speed, depth, stance width or variation.
Greater stance width and faster bar speed were found to increase adductor longus muscle activity.
In squats, hip extension moment is increased with heavier loads, a wider stance width, a low - bar, powerlifting technique, by sitting back more, by faster bar speed, and by squatting as deep as possible.
Studies have investigated the effects of stance width and bar speed during back squats as well as squeezing a medicine ball between the legs during leg presses on adductor longus EMG amplitude (McCaw & Melrose, 1999; Manabe et al. 2007; Peng et al. 2013).
Neither stance width nor weight belt usage has been found to affect adductor magnus EMG amplitude.
In squats, the hip extension moment can be increased by using heavier loads, by using a wider stance width, by using a low - bar, powerlifting technique, by sitting back more, by ensuring bar speed is as fast as possible and by squatting as deep as possible without compromising good form.
Performing deadlifts with greater stance width (using a sumo technique instead of a conventional technique) does not appear to alter EMG amplitude in the gluteus maximus (Escamilla et al. 2002; Sorensen et al. 2011).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z