Comparing different stance widths, both McCaw and Melrose (1999) and Paoli et al. (2009) found that muscle activity was greater during squats with a wide
stance width compared to those with a narrower stance width.
The DPN group also displayed a significantly wider
stance width compared to the other groups during stair descent only: mean for DPN 17 cm versus 15 cm for both diabetes patients without DPN and control groups.
Not exact matches
Comparing the effect of squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) reported no differences in hip moment arm lengths between the narrow, medium, and wide
stance width squats at any point in the lowering and lifting phases, except at 45 degrees of knee flexion in the lifting phase, when the medium and wide
stance width squats displayed greater hip moment arm lengths than narrow
stance width squats.
Assessing the phase of movement, Escamilla et al. (2001)
compared the back squat performed with either a narrow or wide (1 vs. 2 times hip
width)
stance with loads equal to the 12RM.
Comparing the effects of squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) did not report actual peak ankle plantar flexion angles, but they did report more heavily - angled shanks in narrow
stance squats
compared to wide
stance squats.
Comparing the effects of squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) reported that peak ankle plantar flexor moments did not differ between narrow and medium
stance squats but were much larger in magnitude during wide
stance squats.
Comparing squats with different
stance widths, both McCaw and Melrose (1999) and Paoli et al. (2009) found that
stance width had no effect on the muscle activity of the adductors (using the same absolute load).
Comparing squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001b) found that muscle activity was greater in narrow
stance width squats
compared to wide
stance width squats.
Comparing the effects of squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a)
compared narrow, medium and wide
stance back squats and found that peak knee angles did not differ between variations.
Assessing
stance width, Escamilla et al. (2001)
compared the back squat with
stance widths equal to 1 and 2.0 times hip
width with loads equal to the 12RM and found that the narrow
stance produced superior gastrocnemius muscle activity
compared to the wide
stance during the back squat.
Comparing the effects of squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a)
compared narrow, medium and wide
stance back squats and found that peak trunk angles did not differ between variations.
Comparing the effect of squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) reported differences in ankle moment arm lengths between narrow, medium, and wide
stance width squats at most points in the lowering and lifting phases.
Comparing squats with different
stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001b) found no differences in ground reaction forces between squats with wide and narrow
stances (with the same absolute loads).
Few studies have been performed
comparing hamstrings EMG amplitude during the deadlift and its variations while varying load, speed, depth,
stance width or variation.
The black wheel arch moldings» emphasize an increase of 40 millimeters track
width compared to the BMW i3 providing a stable
stance and visually a broader presence.
The overall effect is a car with a more aggressive
stance, that appears lower, wider and more planted on the road, despite no increase in
width compared with the previous Evora.
With the
width of 1,800 mm and low
stance of 1,570 mm (+20 mm
compared with the regular Kona), the All - New Kona Electric has a bold appearance on the road, further enhanced by the dedicated 17» alloy wheels.