«Thank God for Jeff Klein and those who
stand for educational choice and support Charter funding that leads to economic mobility and opportunity for poor knack kids,» Mr. Loeb wrote, with «knack» apparently a typographical error for «black.»
«Thank God for Jeff Klein and those who
stand for educational choice and support Charter (sic) funding that leads to economic mobility and opportunity for poor knack kids,» the post read.
Thank God for Jeff Klein and those who
stand for educational choice and support Charter funding that leads to economic mobility and opportunity for poor knack [a typo for black] kids.
His statement, apparently referencing the Ku Klux Klan, also applauded Bronx state Sen. Jeff Klein and others who «
stand for educational choice and support Charter funding that leads to economic mobility and opportunity for poor knack (sp.) kids.»
In the same post, Loeb praised IDC Leader Jeff Klein and others who he said «
stand for educational choice and support Charter funding that leads to economic mobility and opportunity for poor knack (sp.) kids.»
Not exact matches
«Legislators in Ohio have once again
stood up
for families that lack access to high - quality
educational options, and we thank them
for putting kids first,» said Betsy DeVos, Chairman of The American Federation
for Children, a school -
choice advocacy group.
Scholarship tax credits would expand
educational opportunities
for Idaho families, building on long -
standing state policies encouraging private investments in education, as well as successful school
choice programs in other states.
Our experiences and surmises are remarkably similar: you think Dr. Bengtsson did what he did upon realizing he'd endangered his reputation and with it exposed himself to increased opposition from those who would now realize what he
stands for; that he understood better how his free
choice would impact his ability to gain the respectability of being published by respectable publishers; that he figured out the grant opportunities gained by open alliance with the tax - free «
educational charity» that has a surprising amount of money
for media campaigns and spectacle would not balance the grants he'd lose from people who consider association with a transparent tax fraud scheme a bad thing; and, ultimately that he had betrayed the trust of his valued colleagues by exposing them to such scandal.
We as members work in this industry and no one really looks out
for the members, Yes I know the public, need to be protected this is a given but what about all the dues, fees and others costs we as members pay to be professional and provide honest, integrity services to the public who will look out
for the members maybe we as members need to start up a new industry where we are not paying so much
for all the dues, fees, and other
educational or costs to be professional and that we can have
choice and know that we have someone who will
stand up
for the industry better and really look
for ways to improve it.